Roadmap action plan education. Draft "road map" of an educational organization

View document content
"Roadmap Project"

Draft "road map" of an educational organization

MBOU "Alupka secondary school No. 1 named after Amet-Khan Sultan"

Action plan of an educational organization aimed at improving the efficiency and quality of educational services

Performed:

2018

I .Main directions:

Creation of conditions for the development of young talents and children with high motivation for learning;

Introduction of GEF;

II . Expected results:

At least 90 percent of children from 7 to 17 years old will be covered by additional education programs, including 80 percent of them - at the expense of budget funds; at least half of the children and adolescents of this age category will be covered by public projects using media technologies aimed at education and upbringing.

III . Numerical (quantitative) indicators and characteristics of school changes:

Measures to improve the efficiency and quality of education services

Implementation of activities

Introduction of GEF;

Staffing (training and retraining program);

Implementation of a quality assessment system;

Development and implementation of programs for the development of additional education;

Formation of a monitoring system.

View presentation content
"Roadmap Project"

• Performed:
• Zakasovskaya Inna Vladimirovna

• - creation of conditions for the development of young talents and children with high motivation for learning;
• - participation in the development and implementation of mechanisms for an effective contract with the heads of municipal educational organizations of additional education in terms of establishing the relationship between the indicators of the quality of municipal services provided by the organization
• and efficiency of the head of the educational organization.
• Ensuring high quality services:
• - introduction of GEF;
• - staffing (training and retraining program);
• - introduction of a quality assessment system;
• - development and implementation of programs for the development of additional education;
• - formation of a monitoring system.

• At least 90 percent of children from 7 to 17 years old will be covered by additional education programs, including 80 percent of them - at the expense of budget funds; at least half of the children and teenagers of this age category will be covered by public projects with
• using media technologies aimed at education and upbringing.
• Ensuring the education of all schoolchildren according to the new federal state educational standards;
• improving the quality of education for schoolchildren.

Name of indicator

unit of measurement

Number of contingent

2018

Number of students in general education programs

2019

Number of students per 1 teacher

Share of students studying according to the new federal state educational standards

2020

percent

• Bringing the conditions of the organization
• compliance with updated
• documents governing the requirements
• to the conditions of organization of educational
• process (as regulatory
• acts at the federal level)
• Indicators
• Number of organizations
• additional education for children,
• relevant to modern
• requirements for
• organization conditions
• educational process in them: not
• less than 80%

• Implementation of measures to identify and develop
• young talents
• Indicators
• Share of students
• under general education programs,
• participating
• in the Olympics and
• various competitions
• level, in general
• number of students
• for general education programs

• Organization and holding of seminars and master classes for teachers of organizations
• additional education for children
• Indicators
• Conducting at least 8 seminars annually
• and master classes
• for teachers
• organizations
• additional education for children
• on the organization of work with talented
• children, introduction
• new educational technologies

• Implementation of the system of final mass
• activities with
• students, incl.
• held on an interdepartmental basis (olympiads,
• competitions, contests,
• forums, festivals,
• conferences,
• regional projects)
• Indicators
• Number of events held
• per year, at least 20

Participation in the development and implementation of mechanisms for an effective contract with the heads of municipal educational organizations of additional education in terms of establishing the relationship between the indicators of the quality of municipal services provided by the organization

and efficiency of the head of the educational organization.

• Carrying out work
• According to the conclusion
• employment contracts with managers
• municipal
• organizations
• additional
• children's education in
• in accordance with the standard form of the contract
• Indicators
• leaders
• organizations
• additional education for children,
• working on
• labor
• (effective) contracts from the total
• number of managers

• Organization
• informational
• support of events for the introduction of an effective contract in organizations
• additional education for children
• Indicators
• Coverage of events for the introduction of an effective contract
• in organizations
• additional
• education of children in regional and
• local funds
• mass media

• Participation in seminars and
• videoconferencing for clarification
• labor collectives on the issue of introducing an effective contract
• Indicators
• Pedagogical
• workers
• educational
• institutions,
• additional education for children,
• participants of seminars and conferences

• Ensuring high quality services:
• - introduction of GEF;
• - staffing (training and retraining program);
• - introduction of a quality assessment system;
• - development and implementation of programs for the development of additional education;
• - formation of a monitoring system.

Guest "KP" Deputy Director of the Department of Strategy, Analysis and Forecast of the Ministry of Education and Science Anna Vladimirovna Khamardyuk

The Education Roadmap will improve the school system. Photo: Anatoly ZHDANOV

Change text size: A A

She spoke about how the plans of the ministry will be synchronized with the plans of regional and municipal authorities.

Anna Vladimirovna, let's first understand the terms. We will talk about "road maps" in education. I'm used to the term "road map" in politics, I imagine what a road map is in the navigator. How long has the Ministry of Education and Science switched to "road maps"?

Vysotsky has an excellent musical about Alice in Wonderland. There is a wonderful song there: "In order not to fall into a trap, in order to get lost in the dark ... you need a very clear plan." Only the warbler, which flies to Africa from our latitudes, has a built-in GLONASS in its head. And people who are engaged in some specific practice, in this case, changes in the field of education, do not have such built-in mechanisms. Therefore, tools are needed. Tools are planning.

The usual planning schemes have often failed lately, so there are a large number of plans. In order to connect them, coordinate them and understand whether the case has fallen out of them and whether there are simply only lines tied to specific deadlines. Therefore, "road maps" are a certain label that indicates a certain structure of the plan.

Yes, "road maps" - the term is more from the sphere of politics, economics, business. The transfer of this tool to the social sphere, in this case to education, has its advantages. We have many levels of responsibility. Federal level. There is the level of the subjects of the Russian Federation, the regional level - this is everything that concerns schools, kindergartens, institutions of additional education for children, secondary vocational education. And the level of responsibility of the educational organizations themselves, in which all these changes should be implemented.

The phrase “road maps” began to be used so that at the level of recognition everyone immediately understood what was at stake, included their levels of responsibility. What have I done specifically to achieve the targets set in the decrees of the President of the Russian Federation? The indicators are formulated very serious, requiring a serious contribution.

- Are we talking about the May decrees of Vladimir Putin?

Yes. These are the expectations of society from a certain industry that must be realized so that people feel qualitative changes and this affects the quality of life in general.

- Roadmaps of the Ministry of Education refer to which structures?

All levels of education. Including changes in the field of science.

From preschool children, I understand that point “B” where you need to come is the absence of queues in kindergartens. So? What are the endpoints for other levels of education?

Not everything is so simple in kindergartens. In addition to the fact that we mechanically solve the problem with the queue for kindergarten, all children from 3 to 7 years old get equal access to education, to preparation for school. In this regard, it is important to understand that in December we are adopting a standard for preschool education, which, in principle, has not existed in nature until now. There were minimum requirements for preschool education programs, but there was no standard. These are the requirements for the conditions and programs that are implemented in kindergartens.

Yes. But the reference reporting point is December 2013. We are starting now. The regions have adopted their own plans, in accordance with which they bring conditions in kindergartens.

- Will the education of children, the approach of educators to children, to educational programs change?

Of course.

- And this is included in the roadmap for preschool education?

Yes. All teaching staff are gradually increasing wages. Including employees of organizations of preschool education. Teachers in kindergartens should receive no less than the average for the general education of the region.

I began to understand that a “road map” is when the responsibilities of different structures seem to cling to each other, link up ...

- … and work for the overall effect.

- By what date should it be so wonderful in kindergartens?

By 2016, we should not have a queue for children from 3 to 7 years old. By 2018, it is necessary to gradually introduce new standards of preschool education. There, the conditions for children are changing, as well as the program, the content of the work of teachers with children in kindergarten. Emphasis is play.

Standards for junior, middle, high school have already been adopted.

- Yes, the latest standard should come into force in 2020...

Although, in pilot mode, our schools can switch to the accepted standard and develop educational programs in accordance with it. The programs that are implemented in the school are developed by the educational organization itself. In agreement with the public authorities, but independently. This is the competence of the educational organization itself, which takes into account the contingent, the features of zoning.

- It's clear with the standards for high school. What other elements are included in the school roadmap?

The same line as in preschool education - wages. Improving the quality of life of educators themselves. On the other hand, the line that is included inside is to assess the quality of educational services. Many of us in the pedagogical environment do not like this wording. Recently, the demands on the part of parents to what happens to their children at school have increased. Schools are gradually ceasing to be a black box into which you handed over your child and received it after six lessons.

Former Minister of Education Andrey Fursenko used the term - "luggage office" ... The main thing is that there are no problems with places in schools.

Not everywhere! Here the situation differs depending on the region. Somewhere there are no problems with places in schools, children do not study in two shifts. And somewhere there is such a problem. Children in the Far North are trained in two shifts. They come to school when it is still dark, they leave when it is already dark. These features are taken into account in regional roadmaps. There is a federal roadmap that outlines all the positions that we have discussed, and there is a regional roadmap that takes into account, relatively speaking, a specific landscape.

I know many regions where there are two-shift schools. Is it a prerequisite for regional maps to have a solution to this problem?

If this problem is fixed, then it is included in the roadmap activities. This is the construction of schools, the strengthening of the fund that the regional system of general education has, the transfer of all to a one-shift regime. Although this is a resource-intensive event. A roadmap is a financial planning tool. Here are the priorities. They are distributed over time. It is possible to plan resources.

Let's move on to higher education.

This is primarily the responsibility of the ministry.

What should be here? Does this roadmap include instructions from the president to ensure that by 2020 five universities are included in the international ranking?

Of course. On the one hand, this is a very deep internal audit of the system, in which painful points are identified in terms of inefficient universities and programs for their reorganization. On the other hand, it is a program that makes it possible to provide support to those universities that already today have serious resources and a chance to lead in the global context of the provision of higher education services.

Such programs are included in the roadmap. Support for 15 universities will now be provided from the federal budget to ensure that their programs are implemented and we see our universities in the top lines of world rankings.

- The salaries of the teaching staff are also included?

Of course. Russia is a country of regions. A huge territory, the regions have their own characteristics and their own economy. The fact that our salary targets are tied to the average salary in the region is very significant. For all levels of education, the salary target for teaching staff is tied to the regional average salary. For university employees, it should almost double the figure.

- And the timing?

Funds are allocated to universities that are subordinate to the Ministry of Education and Science, and to universities whose founders are other federal authorities. The Ministry of Agriculture has its own universities, the Rechmorflot, the Ministry of Culture, the Ministry of Health. The salary rises in stages, this is monitored, summaries are given on how this increase schedule is built.

By what time should the salaries of employees of preschool educational institutions grow up to what threshold?

100 percent must be in line with wages in general education.

- This year?

- Is there any money already allocated for this?

Significant funds from the federal budget. Where the powers of the federation, there is one funding scheme. Where the powers of the regions are, this is the corresponding system of subsidies. The Ministry of Finance allocates subsidies to the regions to ensure that these indicators are met.

- 50 billion has already been allocated to solve problems with queues for kindergarten.

Roadmaps are supported not only by regulatory documents, but also by certain funding. The salary increase is aggregated. On a large scale at the federation level, it is read and recorded on large labels. Many are indignant: what is the average temperature in the hospital? At the level of the federation and at the level of such a volume of data, such figures can be regulated and operated on. Internally, it builds on much more subtle interaction tools.

Since the increase in wages is not carried out by everyone and everyone, someone will have more, someone less, depending on how the system of remuneration is formed at the level of the educational organization. There is a mandatory part of the salary - the basic one, and there is a stimulating one. And this incentive fund is distributed within the educational organization, depending on the specific contribution of each employee. The development of these indicators is the business of the educational organization itself. The same goes for educational programs. We are developing an educational program and we understand what the school must do in order for the student to achieve this.

- Small school road map.

And what will I do as a teacher of this school. And it is fixed in such indicators. There must be some agreement on these indicators. Accordingly, we will distribute the stimulus fund. For some, the salary can be significantly higher, for someone below average. Therefore, the overall level is formed depending on how a person works and how his work is evaluated by those who are called to evaluate.

- By what date should the salary of school workers be raised to the level of the average for the economy of the region?

Already.

- This is a milestone year.

We reach and hold.

- By the teaching staff of universities?

We are gradually increasing wages in accordance with regional indicators by 2018. The roadmap is a kind of five-year plan from 2013 to 2018.

- What results should be achieved by 2018 in secondary education, higher education and vocational education?

The main dry residue is the solution to the problem with the queue in kindergartens. A significant change in practice in the kindergartens themselves, associated with the transition to standards. This is the development of the content of work in schools. Work to achieve such indicators that will allow our students to compete with students from leading countries in terms of results. And solving the problem with the conditions in the school.

In secondary vocational education, it is important to create multifunctional centers of applied qualifications at the regional level. Not just colleges, educational organizations that give a specialty once, but can give it repeatedly, and those people who have been educated for a long time, provide the opportunity to come and get a new specialty, become in demand on the labor market. This is also a resource-intensive direction, since it makes great demands on the base of such organizations.

Higher professional education - here certain claims are made by the society and the expectations associated with the fact that our higher education is competitive in the world market of educational services.

By 2018, competitive universities should remain, the rest should either be closed or they should be merged, reorganized, reformed, and brought up to a modern level.

Yes. By 2018 there are such ambitious tasks.

The Ministry of Education and Science and universities of the Project 5-100 will “synchronize their watches”.

Recall that this permanent advisory body was created to consider the development of leading Russian universities (established in 2013 in accordance with the Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation of March 16, 2013 No. 211). The Council includes foreign and Russian representatives of the scientific and academic community, government officials responsible for reforms in education, as well as recognized world experts and researchers in higher education. Since 2013, 10 meetings of the Council have been held.

At the eleventh meeting, the reports of universities participating in the Project 5-100 on the implementation of programs to improve competitiveness will be considered. In addition, the Council will prepare recommendations for the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation on the continuation of state support for Project 5-100 universities and proposals for Project 5-100 universities on updating competitiveness programs.

On the eve of the meeting, the Minister of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation, Deputy Chairman of the Council, Mikhail Kotyukov, recalled that by 2020 at least five Russian universities should be included in the top 100 leading world rankings. “Here it is important to understand that Project 5-100 is not just aimed at promoting Russian universities in the rankings, but involves increasing the competitiveness of the entire Russian higher education system, its integration into the international scientific and educational space through the formation of a group of leading universities,” the minister emphasized. At the same time, he added that the experience of the Project 5-100 universities, their best practices of transformation into the world's leading scientific and educational centers are being disseminated among all Russian universities.

According to Mikhail Kotyukov, universities should build an effective policy to increase their competitiveness, build up human resources, develop science, and implement joint educational programs with Russian and foreign partners. “We expect productive work from universities in all these areas,” Mikhail Kotyukov summed up, emphasizing that if such work is carried out with high quality, Russian education will be recognized on the world stage, and many of our universities will take their rightful places in international rankings.

At the Council in Kaliningrad, presentations will be made by representatives of university teams, in particular, IKBFU. I. Kant, Kazan Federal University, Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, National University of Science and Technology MISIS, Tomsk State University, National Research University Higher School of Economics, National Research Nuclear University MEPhI, Peoples' Friendship University of Russia, St. Petersburg Polytechnic University, Far Eastern Federal University and other leading Russian universities.

As the Governor of the Kaliningrad Region Anton Alikhanov noted, the Kaliningrad Region is one of the most intensively developing Russian regions, which is working to strengthen global competitiveness in various areas. “For many years IKBFU im. I. Kant is one of the key partners of the region. Thanks to the university, the region is known in the academic and research environment, the recognition and promotion of the brand of the Kaliningrad region as an advanced and high-tech region is ensured,” he stressed, adding that the administration is counting on continued cooperation with the university and will support the university.

Based on the results of the meeting, the members of the Council will form proposals and recommendations both for the Russian Ministry of Education and Science and for the universities themselves. The Ministry of Education and Science of Russia decides to continue providing state support to universities participating in Project 5-100 in the next financial year, subject to the availability of budget allocations for these purposes.