Biography of Christina potupchik. How Kristina Potupchik stopped being a radical guardian

The almost red commissar gained fame thanks to her scandalous political activity as part of the pro-government Nashi youth movement. Kristina Potupchik probably benefited the most from participating in the “fight” against the opposition, gaining fame in the country, then a position in Rosmolodezh. However, "earthly glory" passed quickly.

early years

Kristina Andreevna Potupchik was born on January 19, 1986 in the famous city of Murom, Vladimir Region. Mom, Irina Borisovna worked as the head of the Russian language office at the Faculty of Philology of the Vladimir State University for the Humanities. Father, Andrei Petrovich, a graduate of the Gorky Higher Military School of Logistics, after demobilization in 2003, established the private company Trading Firm Collection.

The girl grew up in Vladimir, in the mid-2000s she wrote notes in local newspapers. In 2008 she graduated from the Faculty of Philology of the Vladimir State University for the Humanities with a degree in Russian Language and Literature. However, some publications doubt this, since her revelations are given, written with errors: "I am a philologist by education."

Commissioner

Kristina Potupchik was brought into the Nashi movement by her mother, who really liked the fact that free courses in the humanities (history, politics, psychology) were organized there. Soon, an active and active girl made her way to the position of Nashi press secretary in her hometown.

In the fall of 2007, she replaced Anastasia Suslova as spokeswoman for the youth movement. In the same year, she became the press secretary of the State Committee of the Russian Federation for Youth Affairs. When Vasily Yakemenko, the former head of Nashi, was appointed head of the department. The following year, she began to do the same work already at the Federal Agency for Youth Affairs, where Yakemenko went to increase. In 2010-2011, she was constantly mentioned in various publications as the press secretary of Rosmolodezh.

Struggle in the media space

Kristina Potupchik is an active blogger, maintains pages in LiveJournal, Ekho Moskvy and Twitter. Some experts reported that she could promote her diary in LiveJournal, paying 30 rubles for each publication that referred to her entries. And that some of the publications in her diary got to the top of the LJ rating even before the first comments were given.

In the responsible post of press secretary, she constantly wrote about the "unsightly" aspects of the opposition's activities, made harsh and often scandalous statements. In 2010, many publications noted that Kristina Potupchik's blog is often one of the key organizers of the distribution of videos with scandalous materials, including sexual content, to various cultural and political figures. Including satirist and journalist of the regional deputy and politician Ilya Yashin and journalist Mikhail Fishman.

For a new democracy

In 2012, she announced on her blog that she was leaving the youth movement due to fatigue. The following year, she organized the Open New Democracy Foundation, which intended to support various projects from donation to the promotion of taxation. According to some media reports, the organization is engaged in analyzing the state of the blogosphere, writing posts and monitoring on orders from the Presidential Administration of the Russian Federation.

After Kristina Potupchik's email was hacked in December 2014, the Anonymous International hacker group published reports on opposition leaders' posts on social networks and critical materials about the actions of the authorities. In addition, the correspondence contained letters with information about the remuneration that bloggers received for their publications. The “Nashi” paid both in money and in expensive gifts.

From Radicals to Centrists

In 2014, Christina Potupchik was elected to the Public Chamber, where she took up issues of the information society and mass communications. The elections were held by means of Internet voting and were not without scandal. Her rival considered it abnormal that in addition to the 800 votes that Kristina had after two weeks of voting, another 2.5 thousand have been added over the past four days. According to the results of counting the number of collected votes, she was the second.

In recent years, Kristina Potupchik has practically disappeared from the media space. She slightly changed her political image: from a brawler she became a moderate centrist.

personal information

Little is known about Christina Potupchik's personal life. She is an active blogger and user of social networks, while gaining fame through political scandals. For example, she began to attack Ksenia Sobchak when she posted a video on the Internet, where the head of Rosmolodezh, Vasily Yakemenko, ordered oysters in an expensive restaurant. What discredited the young star of Russian politics, at that time her immediate superior.

At the same time, while working in the youth movement, she published her candid photos on the Web, where she poses in beautiful swimsuits. The pictures were quickly removed from her LiveJournal page, but photos of Christina Potupchik have already spread among Internet users. Despite the wide discussion of the beautiful commissar body of the young politician, there were no comments from her curators.

https://www.site/2016-10-26/kak_kristina_potupchik_perestala_byt_radikalnym_ohranitelem_intervyu

“I had a choice: either in Nashi, or a link to my grandmother”

How Kristina Potupchik stopped being a radical protector. Interview

Something strange happened to Kristina Potupchik. Until recently, she was a well-known blogger from the “guardian camp”: she was hated by the liberal oppositionists, she cursed with them on social networks, she was the embodiment of the concept of the “Kremlin blogosphere”. Still: the former press secretary of the infamous Nashi. However, in recent months, even recent opponents have noticed that Potupchik has changed her position: from a radical guardian she has become a moderate centrist and suddenly turned communication from a squabble into a dialogue. The correspondent of the site asked Potupchik about what happened to her, and heard a lot of unexpected words.

- Recently, you have been quoted more and more by the opposition, although you have been known for many years as a representative of the guards' camp. What is a change of course?

What is "protection"? As I supported Putin, I support it. He said not so long ago that the Russian national idea is patriotism. I have always been a patriot, because I always wanted to live in a strong Russia that you can be proud of. In fact, this means that I want people to stop being jailed for likes and reposts in social networks, because some regional judge or cop needs to close the statistics. So that regional officials stop using the law on foreign agents to pressure local NGOs that point out their incompetence. So that the prices on government contracts are overstated not tenfold, but at least twofold. So that all kinds of activists stop solving the problems of their own libido by closing exhibitions and throwing eggs at participants in school competitions. So that officials of the Ministry of Health, who in times of crisis promote foreign manufacturers of homeopathy and clean the pockets of patients, lose their jobs for incompetence and fraud. I don't want that much, do I?

The defensive agenda has always been more focused on criticism and exposure of the West. But now everything is clear with the West much better than before. I remember that a few years ago, at the word “Russophobia,” many sneered contemptuously and said that adult uncles don’t care about Russia. And now the main character in all the debates of the American elections is Putin, unprecedented pressure is being exerted even on our Paralympic athletes, blackmail with sanctions continues. I'm not a diplomat, I don't get into international politics. But many officials involved in domestic politics constantly threaten the West with bullshit and say that an undeclared war is going on against us. Dear, how are you going to win this war? Grabbing “spiritual bonds” with one hand, and smashing museum exhibits with the other, demanding to give up condoms and seeking a ban on the rock opera “Jesus Christ Superstar”? The Ministry of Health convinces to buy sugar balls with a premium, I'm not kidding, of several thousand percent, and promotes the French concern of homeopathic charlatans - is this how they strengthen their positions in front of foreign aggression? Editor-in-chiefs of the media, are they hoping to defeat the West with informational selections of unsuccessful photos of Poroshenko?

Recently, ecologists who came to put out fires along the banks of the rivers were beaten in the Kuban. After that, articles were published: they say, excuse me, environmentalists received international grants, they probably burned the reeds themselves, the locals did not stand up in vain. And there, while sovereign autochthonism was being defended, there was no time for fires, the reeds burned down, and with it almost all coastal birds and animals. Just someone decided to save money on mowing thickets. During the crisis, the amount of money passed through the hands of officials has decreased, and many want to finally snatch a bigger piece, and attention is diverted, blaming the "damned State Department" for all the sins. They steal and leave for the West, but we will stay, I myself will stay, because I don’t want to leave. This is my country. I'm not going to sit back and watch her being crippled by stuffing her own pockets or currying favor with imaginary ideologues. If you choose who is the more dangerous enemy - an ecologist who extinguishes Russian reeds with an American grant, or an official who sets fire to these very reeds - for me there can be no doubt.

You say that this is an oppositional agenda, but when did common sense become oppositional? Do not beat children, do not blame raped girls that they are “to blame”, do not say that vaccinations cause autism, build roads that will last at least a year without patches, stop fighting baby boxes, do normal HIV prevention. This is an opposition agenda, or what? If so, then Putin is now the main oppositionist, and I am with him. Moreover, with us - created by the president of the ONF. "People's Front" is not engaged in any opposition, nor the search for agents of the State Department, its task has always been to identify sabotage among the officials themselves, constructive criticism, designed to help the authorities improve and evolve. I am doing the same.

“The guys from the movement knew that Putin was nearby”

Was your family interested in politics at all? At what age did you become interested in all this?

My parents have always been interested in politics. Grandfather hid all his life that he was a Jew, fearing pressure on the fifth point. My father sent soldiers to Chechnya, and before that, together with his mother, he spent several years in the service in Kazakhstan, until the Russians began to be pressed there. In our family, as in many other families that survived Perestroika, the nineties, the default and everything else, it has always been customary to prepare for the worst - such Russian fatalism. They subscribed to all the newspapers, read them carefully, and studied applied political science throughout the entire entrance. And our generation, on the contrary, was one of the first who already lived in a more or less calm environment. So, as a child, I did not steal newspaper editorials from my parents' closet, but books about Angelica and the king. It was my parents who brought me to Nashi.

How did you get into Nashi? Why, by the way, not in the "Young Guard"?

- Mom worked at the university in Vladimir, and when Nashi just started opening a branch in the city, they came to campaign in hostels and lecture halls. Mom liked that they promised free courses in economics, politics, sociology. At that moment, very opportunely, I once again got out of hand, and my parents put me in front of a choice: either “Ours” or a link to my grandmother. But if Nashi recruited everyone in a row, then it was not clear how to get into MGER - they still prepared the future nomenclature, and there were always their own applicants for this role.

- Could it happen that you would be swung in the other direction and you would become an opposition activist?

- To be honest, I don’t remember any opposition in Vladimir. Such a downtrodden child like me, besides girls, had no chance to cross paths with any National Bolsheviks, and Yabloko and other Democrats, even at that time, gave the impression of half-deadness. It’s not that there was any choice of activist opportunities then, and even now, consider that there is none. Yes, and it was important for us, the hungry, to identify ourselves with strength and success. And who in Russia embodies strength and success better than Putin?

— I remember that young people were attracted to such movements with the idea of ​​a social lift. Was it important to you?

- The pinnacle of a career that I was constantly hinted at at the university is to study better, and then maybe I can compete for the position of a university librarian. Or so, or go to trade - in the store or from the hands, "Herbalife". I never felt special business talents in myself and from the very beginning I was preparing to decay somewhere among the catalog shelves. Maybe it was not so strongly felt in Moscow, but in the regions they clung to their teeth even for a ghostly chance to break out of this wheel of rebirth of the name of a junior researcher.

- It worked?

- In Nashi, indeed, many received an impetus for growth, at least some opportunities, horizontal connections with other sensible peers. But still, the social lift is about the Young Guard. MGER was an elevator that itself came to the right place, but no one was going to just share their familiar places with Nashi. The "Young Guard" were given fish, "Ours" were shown where to catch it. But there were almost no careerists among us, almost all the commissars who have achieved something are the same as me, people from small towns who were ready even to the bottom of the ocean - if only not to the bottom of a bottle, as most of their neighbors and acquaintances. The poor got bogged down in everyday alcohol battles, the rich lost their sense of reality in the consumer race. The youth did not have examples and authorities, except for Putin. He was a simple man who achieved everything himself. And the guys from the movement always knew that Putin was nearby. He came to our forums, we came to meet him at the residence - he was our idol, the personification of a completely new concept of self-made. We grew up in this environment.

Of course, it was a strong imprinting. The feeling that Putin is with us, that he is one of us, never left, even when the movement was closed, even when they drove me to interrogations, hacked the mail. I don't know anyone who would root for Russia and its future more sincerely than Putin. But one Putin, alas, is not enough to keep track of everything that happens. And all the young people from the very beginning were, first of all, such “presidential liaisons” who, to the best of their understanding and ability, supported Putin’s course.

Due to the fact that Nashi was not a social lift in the classical sense, of course, there were many people who lived with high expectations and were not ready for the very rapid decline of the movement. There was even a case of suicide, after the dead guy there was a note that was clearly written by a person very disappointed with life. For ten years the commissars lived in field conditions, fled from city to city, abandoned their institutes, quit good jobs in order to work on the move. Most of them were fanatically devoted to the idea and waited for the idea to thank them. But this is not a charitable foundation that should babysit everyone. Someone took advantage of opportunities, someone failed and found himself dropped out of normal social life. And getting back into it is not an easy task. Can you imagine any Motorola going back to the car wash? "Either pan or gone," such people believe. All pans do not become.

Do you keep in touch with former colleagues in the movement? And with Vasily Yakimenko?

- I do not maintain contact with Vasily Yakimenko - there is nothing to contact about. He now has his own projects, very far from political life, and I, on the contrary, am engaged in politics.

— You are engaged in political SMM. How big is this market?

- There is always a demand for smart specialists of any qualification, from SMM to field workers, in politics. Of course, Russian elections are far from being a multibillion-dollar colossus, as in the United States, but I don’t know a single political strategist and, in general, a professionally involved in the political struggle of a person who would now be out of work.

- Do you maintain contacts with the presidential administration?

— Of course, like many of my colleagues. Before the elections, for example, there was a meeting of political scientists and political experts with Vyacheslav Volodin - very informative, by the way, in two hours he exchanged with us his vision of the future of politics in Russia, including the legislative branch and the State Duma. The new season of parliament will surprise many, especially skeptics. Kiriyenko has not met the new team yet, but I think we will be able to find a common language - after all, we all have common goals.

“Enemies are those who violate the rights of Russians”

Let's get back to your views. How have they evolved in recent years? There is a feeling that you have become much more moderate.

- It seems to me that the views of most people become more balanced, centrist with age. Youth is a time of radical actions, slogans and harsh statements. Plus, the younger a person is, the more attention is paid to him by the environment, and with age, his own thoughts and ideas are formed. I am no exception. I want to live in a normal country and I am ready to fight for it. Perhaps this is the moderation of views?

- In general, such an evolution took a long time? Did someone influence you?

- The main one who influenced the members of the movement while Nashi existed was, of course, Yakimenko. When “Ours” disappeared literally in an instant, much of what we believed in also disappeared with them. But I never perceived the disappearance of Nashi as a defeat. Our goal was Putin's victory, and this goal has been achieved. Of course, during our existence, individual curators used the movement in their own interests, but no one tried to deceive us, as well as to fool our heads with completely false ideas about some kind of “sixth columns”. I managed to fully realize all my possibilities in Nashi, and when the project was closed, the world around did not collapse. I had more free time, which I invested in myself, took up self-education, read books, watched how the political system was changing.

When I was offered a new job, I already had my own vision of what value system I would start from. I can talk for a long time about humanism, patriotism, renewal, and so on, but there are some basic, obvious things. Sanctions are sanctions, but it was neither Obama nor Putin who unscrewed the light bulbs in the elevator. Paternalism slows down society. Instead of myths about order under Stalin, about God-bearing people or about a conspiracy of pedophiles, it is better to learn your inalienable right to be free, happy, healthy and successful - and every inhabitant of Russia has these rights, regardless of his political views, sexual orientation and degree of spirituality . Violating these rights means harming society and the country. Accordingly, enemies are those who violate our rights.

Let's take the law on foreign agents - its authors wanted NGOs that are engaged in political activities to do this without hiding the fact that they receive foreign money, which means that they can be engaged in foreign interests. They wanted the best, but it turns out that the regional non-profit partners of the World Health Organization, involved in anti-smoking projects, are included in the register of foreign agents. But when a French homeopathic company organizes a press conference about the place of homeopathy in modern pharmaceuticals, the Ministry of Health participates in the event. Of course, multi-colored sugar pills, which do not contain a single molecule of the drug itself, cannot occupy any place in pharmaceuticals. The effectiveness of homeopathy is the same as that of placebo pacifiers. But the company is making billions in Russia selling its quack potions. The scammers want the Russians to be more willing to take their money to them, and organize the indulgence of the Ministry of Health for themselves - supposedly their funds are related to medicine. And a representative of the Ministry of Health would sit next to the deceivers, promoting pseudoscience to the masses - all so that the company would earn more money for the health of Russians. If there is an exemplary example of the activity of a foreign agent, this is it. It is good that the public, including myself, drew attention to this sabotage and criticism of the possible participation of officials became widespread. The Ministry of Health was forced to give back. Will our country benefit from this? Will win. Will citizens win? Will win. The French company will sell less of its fuflomycin and fool fewer people. This is what patriotism looks like in my understanding.

“I sympathize with all the prisoners”

How did you react to the protests of 2011-2012? I don’t think I went to rallies, but did my friends go?

- I didn’t go, but there were some acquaintances. In general, the “bog” protests are the best proof that the main enemies of the opposition are not the FSB, the “E” center or the investigating authorities, but the leaders of the non-systemic opposition itself, who did everything so that the participants in those protests went home, because “these still worse". And, by the way, they coped with the task so well that now there is no opposition at all in the media field. They periodically write to me in the comments why I stopped fighting political opponents. How do you order to deal with what is not? Now, with all the desire, it is difficult to find traces of the liberal opposition. This, by the way, is another, purely technical, reason why I have recently switched to criticizing government officials. In the absence of “non-systemists”, it became very clear which of the officials not only causes real harm to the country, but also could compete in terms of the scale of the threat with the majority of the opposition together.

Do you sympathize with the prisoners in the Bolotnaya case?

- I sympathize with all the prisoners, a Russian prison is, alas, not a place intended for a person. Therefore, I, perhaps, support any decriminalization of non-serious articles.

— Do you believe that all the protests are inspired by the world behind the scenes (I heard this opinion from your colleagues in the OP)?

- Of course not. In general, this, of course, is a very bold statement, given that, for example, the protest of the "Officers of Russia" against the exhibition of Jock Sturges was led by member of the OP Anton Tsvetkov. The NOD movement regularly holds protests, Cossacks, fans of Dmitry Enteo ... Although I am listing it now and starting to doubt: maybe there is something in the version about behind the scenes?

“Tusovka developed a primitive demarcation”

You are a member of the Public Chamber. What are you doing there?

- I am mainly engaged in the protection of animals, in addition to individual requests and events, for the last couple of years I have been trying to get the work on the law on the responsible treatment of animals to be resumed. Now in Russia this area is not regulated in any way, because of this it is very difficult to bring torturers to justice, to ensure the right of animals to normal conditions of detention - there are many such moments. I hope that State Duma deputies will begin active work on it already in the autumn session, at least such forecasts have already been made.

- The Public Chamber, unfortunately, is famous for the strange PR initiatives of many of your colleagues - from the soda ban to the strange story with the Sturges exhibition and "Officers of Russia". And how do members of the OP feel about this?

- Most of my colleagues in the OP do not contact me in any way - someone because of a difference in views, someone condemns and considers my behavior on social networks unethical. But in general, the Chamber provides its members with considerable freedom of action - any of its members can organize their own round table within the framework of the OP, for example. Therefore, it seems to me not entirely correct to attribute private PR initiatives or misconceptions to all members of the Chamber at once. We have freedom of speech and action there. True, unfortunately, this freedom extends to round tables in support of the same charlatan homeopathy, but my tweet about Zhanna Friske even caused a meeting of the ethics commission. Apparently, deliberately misleading people and passing off sugar pacifiers as medicines is much more ethical than jokes on social networks.

In recent years society has sharply polarized. This is fine?

“People are more tempted than ever to label everything. “If Yevtushenko is against collective farms, then I am for it.” The main political party neologism of recent years is the “handshake”, conformity with the mythical image of a conscientious liberal intellectual, which many oppositionists nurture as an ideal. On some Radio Liberty they like to lament that we do not have an institution of reputation. They imagine this institution as a caste system, where you can interact only with "their own", the opposition shakes hands only with the opposition, the guards shake hands only with the guards. A spherical liberal in a vacuum should not comment on Russia Today, go to Sergei Minaev's establishments, or, God forbid, assume that Crimea is ours. An ironic portrait of exemplary liberalism has even appeared on the Internet - the character Lev Natanovich Sharansky. The funny thing is that in the comments to his comic posts, there are still “fighters against the regime” who consider the image exaggerated to the point of a joke to be quite normal and try to enter into a serious dialogue with it.

The tusovka has developed a primitive demarcation - quilted jackets against liberals, there is no third way. I am a “protector”, therefore, according to the liberals, I should demand a ban on abortion, the extermination of gays and refer to the Dulles Plan. And many of my colleagues believe that I have no right to question the innocence of officials at any level and look for threats to the regime somewhere other than in the West.

At the same time, neither one nor the other thinks at all about where in this nomenclature, in fact, is there a place for patriotism and real politics? There is black, there is white, here are all friends, there are all enemies. Both sides of the barricades, instead of minimally constructive actions, are mainly engaged in the cultivation of hatred towards opponents. Each side believes that only their system of values ​​and views is acceptable, attempts to object cause scandals, pickets, a rain of brilliant green and a hail of eggs. Of course, this is not normal. We need a dialogue, not mutual counter-propaganda from clichés that even their creators seem to no longer believe in. I have nothing to share with those who, like me, are doing something for the benefit of a successful Russia. I am ready to support a person of oppositional views who does something cool and useful, like, for example, Mitya Aleshkovsky with his “Takie Dela” foundation, and I see no problem in criticizing those who have made a name for supporting the authorities if they do something harmful to society.

In Yekaterinburg, for example, there is such a figure - German Avdyushin, in these elections he was number four on the regional list of United Russia, is a member of various departments, a member of the public council under the regional Ministry of Defense, head of the All-Russian Parental Resistance public organization. They even have a section on their website, “The Spiritual Foundations of Russia”. And this “guardian”, together with his movement, actively promotes the ideas of anti-vaccinators and HIV dissidents in the region - local doctors complain about him to the prosecutor’s office, because HIV-deniers not only die from stopping therapy, they also take their children to the grave . And now, instead of a sharp public condemnation and cessation of any contacts, local officials cooperate with him, support him and carry out actions - of course, he is “his own”, for spirituality. Spirituality, under the cover of which people are brought to the grave, is already some kind of Satanism. Is it a healthy society in which this is possible? This is a rhetorical question.

(Note site: in fact, German Avdyushin represents another organization - the "All-Russian Parents' Meeting").

- Then here's a specific question: how do you feel about the installation of busts and monuments to Stalin in the regions of Russia?

— This is not a trend, it is a symptom of social diseases. Few people are interested in the real Stalin at all, people have long been fascinated by the Stalin-myth. This myth is constantly patched up for the needs of the day, trying to bring it into the current discourse, linking it either with victory in the war, or with nostalgia for the “new 37th”, or with delusions about the justice of the Stalinist system and attempts to justify the extermination of the people of Russia during the repressions .

How do people react to what they consider injustice? Rich means he stole. Chatty too? So, an extremist. All the rich must be dispossessed, the punishing right hand must overtake those who break out of people's concepts of justice. Stalinists sincerely believe that repression is good and useful, because they themselves will not fall under the colossus. Usatii's fans are easy to recognize on the Internet - their arguments begin with a description of methods for physically eliminating opponents.

I have already spoken about the paternalism inherent in our society. The formula of this paternalism is "Stalin will come, he will put things in order." Everything must be strictly regulated, no pluralism, discipline must be maintained by force. Of course, no democracy is needed for this. All these parliaments, disputes, media, freedom of expression, in their opinion, are the breeding ground in which disputes between LGBT, GMOs and liberalism flourish. Despite the fact that now these people have caught and are actively promoting this Stalinist-traditionalist discourse and allegedly support the course of power, they are not a support for the regime. Putin they consider too soft. They need a civil war against the "fifth column", which includes everyone, from ministers to environmentalists or volunteers - in short, everyone who will stand in the way of plunging Russia into a new Middle Ages.

What about the opposition's calls for revolution and lustrations?

- Lustrations, in the understanding of the average "anti-regime", are the same repressions. The destruction of opponents, the dictatorship of the only correct opinion is a touching point of unity with formal opponents.

- There is another important trend now: to ban everything that offends those who call themselves "believers." This, too, grew out of "spiritual bonds".

- The radical polarization of society, in fact, already now leads to the fact that people demand to plant everyone with whom they do not agree. It is not mockery of faith that offends them, but any alternative opinion, going beyond the strictly regulated canon. It seems to me that a believer is more likely to be offended not by pokemon in the temple, but by the assumption that a computer game can be a threat to faith. People often resort to the position of offended not when they are offended, but in order to gain the right to censor everything that they do not like. And not only and not so much believers resort to this manipulation. In general, there are the same number of inadequate people among believers as among atheists, tree worshipers, or any other social group. And, of course, we must not allow inadequate people to manage to impose their norms on society.

- Didn't your guardian friends make claims for contacts with the opposition? Are you afraid that one day you will be called a traitor?

- I had a VIP support group that did not differ in mass character before. Minaev and Krasovsky, I remember, supported me when Nosik wrote something very evil about my appearance, and now Nosik himself has changed his mind about arranging holivars and also sometimes intervenes if he holds a similar opinion. Max Kononenko always said only good things, Masha Baronova supports her - she is generally a much greater patriot and guardian than some of my colleagues, it’s not for nothing that Navalny can’t stand her. Timur Prokopenko has always helped and supported me, and this is much more useful than any public words.

But there are always enough haters. There are those who will criticize everything I say, even if I quote the Bible. There has never been any political or bossy will to defend me, and thank God, those speakers in respect of whom such a will appears, very quickly begin to believe that this is a property of their outstanding rhetorical talents, and fall into a parallel reality without feeling the true state of affairs. On the other hand, I believe that the truth is capable of defending itself and will always be supported, as it is now happening - no crowd of fans on the salary is needed, sensible remarks collect social capital not from the party, but from ordinary people who know how to think sensibly and they want to see more sanity and rationality in the media field.

In general, criticism and any confrontation is useful. They managed to drag me for interrogations, and they arranged searches based on denunciations of well-wishers - I endured it, but now it is documented that all these denunciations and suspicions were false, but it became much better to understand who is really a friend and who is an enemy. In general, perhaps, I have never been disappointed only in Putin, he is the only one you can definitely rely on. This explains my political position. I choose the one who will not let you down.

Where do you see yourself in ten years?

- In Russia. Of this I am quite sure.

A family As Novaya Gazeta writes, Christina's mother, Irina Borisovna, works as the head of the Russian language department at the philological faculty of the Vladimir Humanitarian University. And his father, Andrey Petrovich, graduated from the Gorky Higher Military School of Logistics and in 2003 established the Collection Trading Company LLC.

When Christina grew up, her aunt got her a job at the Murom Meridian television company.

In 2013, there was unconfirmed information that Potupchik got married.

Biography

Details of her early biography were not published in open sources. According to unconfirmed reports, in 2008 she graduated from the philological faculty of the Vladimir State University for the Humanities with a degree in Russian language and literature teacher.

According to official figures, in motion "Our" in 2005, Christina was brought by her mother. Potupchik soon became Nashi's press secretary in Vladimir.

The first mention of Potupchik as the press secretary of the Nashi federal movement appeared in September 2007 (before that, the press secretary of the movement was Anastasia Suslova). In October of the same year, it became known that Potupchik also became the press secretary of the State Committee of the Russian Federation on Youth Affairs, which was headed by the former head of Nashi Vasily Yakemenko.

In 2008, when Yakemenko was appointed head of the Federal Agency for Youth Affairs ( Rosmolodezh), Potupchik "acted as Yakemenko's press secretary."

In 2010-2011, she was mentioned in the media as the press secretary of Rosmolodezh, but in April 2011, the press secretary of the department was called Kirill Martynov. In 2012, Novaya Gazeta wrote that the Federal Agency for Youth Affairs did not even know Potupchik's patronymic.

During these years, Christina actively blogged in LiveJournal and microblogging Twitter. The media wrote that she could "cheat" the rating of her diary in LiveJournal and allegedly paid 30 rubles for each publication with a link to her entries, and also that some of the articles posted in her diary fell into the "top" LiveJournal even before the first comments.

On June 9, 2012, Yakemenko, who shortly before announced his intention to create a new political project, was relieved of his post as head of Rosmolodezh. His place was taken Sergei Belokonev. On June 27, Potupchik announced that she was leaving the post of Nashi press secretary. Potupchik did not name the reasons for leaving, and her plans for the future are "so far vague and uncertain." In her blog in LJ, she said that the reason for her departure was fatigue.

At the end of February 2013, Kristina Potupchik announced that she intended to create "Open New Democracy Foundation", which will support non-profit Internet projects, from promoting donation to explaining tax schemes in an accessible way."

In December 2013, the Vedomosti newspaper wrote that Potupchik, as the head of the Fund, from November 29 to December 1, 2013, will participate in a three-day educational seminar on working on the Internet. The seminar was held by the party "United Russia" for 200 employees of regional executive committees. The topic of her lectures was effective work with the Internet audience on Twitter and Facebook.

In May 2014, Christina announced her candidacy for the Internet elections. Public Chamber of the Russian Federation. According to the results of the voting, Potupchik got into the OP of the Russian Federation, taking second place in the top three with 32,531 votes.

In the Civic Chamber, Potupchik took up "the development of the information society, the media and mass communications."

Scandals, rumors

In 2010, the newspaper newspaper. ru reported that Potupchik in her blog told about the release of a calendar with erotic photographs of students of the Faculty of Journalism of Moscow State University as a gift V.V. Putin. Putin's press secretary D. Peskov disowned this undertaking, saying that it was the first time he heard about such a calendar, and that this was Potupchik's private initiative.

As the press secretary of Nashi and Rosmolodezh, she repeatedly made harsh and scandalous statements. In 2010, the press noted that Potupchik's blog was one of the first to publish scandalous videos with compromising evidence, including sexual evidence, against media figures and the opposition, including the former editor-in-chief of Russian Newsweek magazine. Mikhail Fishman, TV presenter and satirist Viktor Shenderovich and a member of the presidium of the movement "Solidarity" Ilya Yashin.

In August 2010, Potupchik spoke obscenely about the musician Yuri Shevchuk who performed at a concert in defense of the Khimki Forest.

In September 2010, she accused Oleg Mitvol, who then held the post of prefect of the Northern Administrative District of Moscow, in the patronage of prostitution (the list of brothels posted on her blog was entitled "Borthels under the wing of Mitvol").

Mitvol accused Potupchik of slander, in connection with which she was summoned to the police for interrogation, but there is no information about the initiation of a criminal case.

In November 2010, Christina stated that the leader of the party "Apple" Sergei Mitrokhin may have ties to a terrorist organization "Al Qaeda"- in response to the earlier suggestion of the Youth Yabloko representatives that Yakemenko could be involved in the attack on the journalist Oleg Kashin.

In 2012, the General Director of Kommersant Demyan Kudryavtsev accused Potupchik of coordinating DDoS attacks on the newspaper's website. Potupchik replied that she considers this slander and is ready to file appropriate lawsuits.

At the end of January 2012, hackers who call themselves Russian Anonymous, began publishing the contents of the hacked correspondence between the head of Rosmolodezh, Vasily Yakemenko, and the press secretary of the Nashi movement, Christina Potupchik.

The published letters contained information about bloggers who received money for their publications. Among them were Ilya Varlamov(zyalt) (400 thousand rubles for two posts) and Sergey Mukhamedov(ottenki_serogo), Oleg Makarenko(fritzmorgen) and Igor Bigdan(ibigdan).

Yakimenko and Potupchik declined to comment on reports of the hack.

During the election process in the RF OP, the competitor Potupchik Valeria Fedotova raised the issue of too fast, in his opinion, the growth of votes for her candidacy (to the 800 votes after the first two weeks of voting, 2,500 were added immediately over the next 4 days). In his opinion, such a result cannot be achieved by simple campaigning on the Internet.

In December 2014 in an anonymous blog "Humpty Dumpty", where materials from the opened correspondence of officials are periodically published, a photograph of Christina Potupchik appeared. In the photo, she is sitting in some kind of office, in her open bag you can see packs of five thousandth bills. Potupchik refrained from commenting, but joked on her Twitter blog: " And in general, why did you decide that I came to receive a salary, and not distribute it?".

Kristina Andreevna Potupchik(b. January 19, 1986, Murom, Vladimir region) - Russian public figure, blogger. Press Secretary of the Nashi youth movement from 2007 to 2012
life path Christina Potupchik before her work in the Nashi movement, little is known. "Ribbon. Ru" writes that "the details of her biography were not published in open sources." There is information about Potupchik's early career that she grew up in Vladimir, where she was published in local newspapers and in 2005 joined the Nashi movement. Novaya Gazeta wrote in 2012 that the Federal Agency for Youth Affairs did not even know the patronymic Potupchik.

The role of Christina Potupchik in the Nashi movement

Since 2007, he has been working as a press secretary for the Nashi youth movement, which speaks in support of V.V. Putin. Later, in a number of media there were publications that she also worked on a voluntary basis at the Federal Agency for Youth Affairs.
Since 2005, Kristina Potupchik has been blogging in LiveJournal, commenting on social and political events. Criticizes some opponents of the current Russian government.

In 2010, Kristina Potupchik in her blog told about the release of a calendar with erotic photographs of journalism students of Moscow State University as a gift to V.V. Putin. Putin's press secretary D.S. Peskov noted that this is a private initiative Potupchik. Participated in the distribution of videos compromising independent journalists and opposition representatives.

In 2012, Kommersant CEO Demyan Kudryavtsev accused Potupchik in that it coordinates DDoS attacks on the newspaper's website. In reply Potupchik stated that she considers this slander and is ready to file appropriate lawsuits.
On June 27, 2012, in her blog on LiveJournal, she announced that she was tired and was leaving the Nashi movement. Anastasia Fedorenchik became Nashi's new press secretary.

Post Office Potupchik
At the end of January 2012, hackers calling themselves Russian Anonymous began publishing the contents of the hacked mail of the head of Rosmolodezh, Vasily Yakemenko, and the press secretary of the Nashi movement. Christina Potupchik, who did not comment on the hack reports.
The published letters contained information about bloggers who received money for their publications. Among them were Ilya Varlamov (zyalt) (400 thousand rubles for two posts) and Sergey Mukhamedov (ottenki_serogo), Oleg Makarenko (fritzmorgen) and Igor Bigdan (ibigdan).
In addition, a discussion of Varlamov’s Reedus project was found in the correspondence, which gave bloggers reason to consider this media “Surkov’s project.”

Kristina Potupchik, a former press secretary of the Nashi youth political movement, opened the Dom Media company, which will provide consulting and information services. E that follows from the SPARK database data.

Potupchik is the sole owner of the company and at the same time its CEO. The authorized capital is 10 thousand rubles.

According to political scientist Pavel Salin, it would be logical if Potupchik continues to engage in political PR - now as a businessman.

This is not the first time pro-Kremlin youth activists have gone into PR consulting, Salin says. - The activists of the so-called "first convocation" (who were especially active 5-10 years ago) have a fairly rich experience in the field of crisis PR.

As an example, we can recall the former Nashi commissar Maria Drokova, the political scientist added. As reported, Maria now lives in the United States and advises global tech companies on PR.

I do not think that Potupchik's business will be connected only with the political sphere, Pavel Salin said. - This market is much narrower than the market for commercial humanitarian technologies (anything that associated with the impact on public consciousness). Now there are many different directions that do not fit into the framework of classical PR.

By the age of 31, Potupchik had accumulated extensive experience in the media sphere. At first she acted as a radical guardian. One of the sensational PR moves: in In October 2010, on her blog, Potupchik said that the students of the Faculty of Journalism of Moscow State University released an erotic calendar with their photos as a gift to President Vladimir Putin. Presidential press secretary Dmitry Peskov then said that this was Potupchik's private initiative.

It is known that Potupchik did not disdain any tricks. When hackers opened Potupchik's mail in 2012, it turned out that she was planning to persecute employees of the Kommersant newspaper. The task was to "psychologically and physically finish off" the journalists. The plans included buying up and destroying the daily circulation of the newspaper, a DDoS attack on the site, blocking the printing house. By the way, there really was an attack on the site, in addition, unknown young people were picketing the editorial office of the newspaper and handing out toilet paper with the Kommersant logo.

In June 2012, Potupchik left Nashi.

Now she He is president of the non-profit organization Open New Democracy Foundation. This organization was registered in 2013 by Potupchik herself (together with Timur Rakhmatullin and Yulia Gorodnicheva). As Potupchik said, the fund was created to support "really important projects, from the promotion of blood donation to the accessible explanation of taxation schemes." The media reported that the fund began to engage in "monitoring, writing posts and analyzing the mood of the blogosphere for the Presidential Administration."

In 2014, a photo of Potupchik , on which she sits next to a bag filled with five thousandth bills. Many bloggers interpreted this photo as evidence of Potupchik's financial relationship with the Kremlin administration in terms of working in social networks. On her Twitter blog, Potupchik wrote: "And anyway, why did you decide that I came to receive a salary, and not distribute it?"

In 2014, Kristina Potupchik became a member of the Public Chamber (in 2017, the composition changed). As reported on the website of the OP, Potupchik was a member of three commissions (the Commission for the Development of the Information Society, the Media and Mass Communications, the Commission for Security and Interaction with the POC, the Commission for Support of the Family, Children and Motherhood).

Lately, Potupchik has been increasingly criticizing officials (for example, the Ministry of Health, regional officials, judges). She also criticized the criminal prosecution of opposition leader Ildar Dadin, who was convicted of repeated violations during protests. At the same time, in a recent interview, Potupchik said that both she supported the president and still supports him.