Michael Moon what where when biography. Mikhail Moon, Vice-President of the Association of Koreans of the Rostov Region, an employee of the Children's State Pedagogical Hospital: “I saved my sister, but I forgave my daughter

On Wikipedia about Michael Moon (and since there is an article about you in the free encyclopedia, it means that you are a famous person) it is written amusingly: “radio host”. And only in the second place is it written that “first of all, he is known as a player“ What? Where? When?". Winner of the "Crystal Owl"

And what is not written at all in the encyclopedia is that the main work of Mikhail Moon is “the commercial director of a company that imports chemical raw materials.” But we still didn’t ask about this - but about what, where and when. Moreover, we recently watched the game of Andrey Kozlov's team, which includes our interlocutor. Then, we recall, experts won.

- Mikhail, how many years have you been in the game?
- It is clear that I did not immediately start playing in a television club. I got into the sports "ChGK" in my first year, in 1991. And in the television club - at the end of 1997.

- For you, the game "under Voroshilov" and the game with the current host, Boris Kryuk, are fundamentally different?
- Of course, the transfer is very author's. The host of ChGK is, with all due respect, not the host, for example, of the Field of Miracles, where there is a format. "What? Where? When?" primarily reflects the personality of the presenter and the personality of the connoisseurs. That's why Voroshilov said: this game is not about answering questions, this is a game about people.

Both Vladimir Yakovlevich and Boris are also participants in the game, but I would say that under Voroshilov it was more game against Voroshilov: he took on the role of an irritant, an element of pressure. Boris, it seems to me, is trying to be an intermediary between experts and some other agents of pressure - spectators, questions, the tournament situation. He only directs this force, without taking on the role of the force itself.

- At the teams different character. What is your character?
- Andrey Kozlov has a rather original approach, which he even imposes on us, the team's players.

As he says, when a question is asked, the answer to it already exists - in the leader, in the noosphere, in the collective unconscious of the team. And in a certain state of command resonance, we are able to pull this answer into the conscious. And in order to achieve this state, Andrey uses certain psychological methods- in other words, it seeks to introduce the team into a state of severe stress.

- Yes? Whoever is on edge is Captain Andrey Kozlov ...
- Stress - not in the sense nervous tension but in terms of pressure. The game is probably 20% reflection and 80% concentration. This is proved by the fact that experts, when they are not sitting at the table, but either standing nearby or watching the game at home, take questions much more often. At the table, responsibility interferes ... TV cameras - to a lesser extent, they are used to them.

A concentrated team would win with a score of 6:3 - 6:4, but usually we win with a score of 6:5 or lose 5:6. On the edge. At the TV screen, I will take 80% of super blitzes, and at the table - 10%, or even less.

How do team members play? You are from different cities...
— Well, everyone on the team with a lot of experience in the game. Another thing is that you need to get used to it.

We usually meet the day before the game, on Friday, we have a small team training, about three games. It is rather an organizational moment: to tune in to each other - someone shouts a little louder, someone does not formulate clearly enough. And we devote the day of the game to psychological adjustment, working out concentration. We have a tradition, Andrei has repeatedly voiced it: we get together, have lunch and go to watch some action movie. The dumber the better.

Before I started playing in Kozlov's team, I practiced the opposite: until the last moment I sat in a hotel room, read some boring nonsense like a ladies' novel, completely unloading the senses so that, according to my hypothesis, they would sharpen at the right moment. Andrey comes from the opposite: to load the senses, while not straining the intellect. Serious scientific research these techniques have not been carried out - which is a pity: it is interesting to find out which is more effective.

How to take a question? Here is the technique...
- The question in "ChGK" is not a riddle of the universe. The universe speaks to us in the language it pleases. A person writes a question so that it can be taken. In this case, the question-answer pair should be small work art. Who wrote "Eugene Onegin"? “Pushkin” is not a couple, because the reaction to this is: “So what then?” And if so, then the answer is probably not correct. Look for another.

Or, for example, if a word in a question seems unnatural, it probably contains the key.

There are questions in which the course of thought is immediately clear: for example, it is necessary to sort out operas or French kings. There are some questions that are overwhelming at first. In a recent game of our team, there was a childish question: “Antonina can’t swim, Nikolai works at a logging site, but where does Evgenia work?” I had a panic in the first second - I did not understand what to do. Thank God that Alena Alexandrova's brain worked in the right direction: it is necessary to turn Antonina into Tonya, Nikolai into Kolya - and then it becomes obvious: Tonya is drowning, Kolya is stabbing, and Zhenya then marries, and she works in the registry office.

What's funny - the viewer, for example, immediately guessed and chuckles: a simple question, that's fools.

Questions "ChGK" in fact - a kind of metalanguage, having mastered which, you solve the problem of taking a question by 70%.

We, the audience, also guess. But maybe the editors of the game deliberately throw up easier questions, for the sake of our self-respect?
- Vladimir Voroshilov, in his fundamental work (he also published two books on ChGK), wrote that for a successful game of What? Where? When?" enough knowledge high school. This game is not about knowledge at all.

- And they also say that sports “What? Where? When?" much more difficult than television. What is it in general - sports "ChGK"?
- It's a slightly different game. Well, as in the automotive industry: a car was built on the same chassis for a different purpose. The goal of the TV game is to show the collision. This is art, because art is primarily “about a person”. The personality is placed in extremely uncomfortable conditions, so that under this pressure everything superficial is gone and the person becomes what he is. Do not cheat live. If you focus on keeping your face, your mask (we all wear masks in everyday life), you will not be able to play, you will only broadcast the mask.

Sports "ChGK" is also interesting. Yes, any intellectual activity brings pleasure: our mind has formed in the process of evolution, and it itches all the time, and the game also provides such a service as collective scratching of the mind, which is many times more pleasant.

But sports "ChGK" is not an art, it's a sport. Trying to figure out which team is... not going to say "smarter" because good players aren't necessarily smarter bad players... Find out who is better at this particular game.

If Kozlov's team plays sports "ChGK" at the World Championships, it will be very far from the first place. Eight years ago, we would still have fought, but in last years the sports game began to go more and more into abstraction, into such a "bead game". A typical question of the current sports game: three x's are located on the y, they carry three alphas, what word is replaced in the question? At the same time, there is an unspoken agreement: nouns are called x and y male, alpha - female ...

“Oh, why such difficulties?
- Because the package of questions in the sports "ChGK" should rank, say, 60 teams. The question of the television "ChGK" should not separate the teams, because only one plays. Therefore, if in the sports "ChGK" you give the teams questions from the television, then on most either almost everyone will answer the questions, or, conversely, almost everyone will not answer - it will not be possible to qualitatively determine who won.

I periodically go to warm up in the sports "ChGK", but here I am not as effective as in "human" matters. Although this is a matter of habit. Just a different language. You once learned French, but did not practice - and you forgot, but if you live in a language environment, you will speak again. If the team strong players in the sports "ChGK" he will sit down for television questions - then Kozlov's team will beat them. Because it is our language.

How did you become a radio host? Because you love football?
- Six years ago, Radio Zenith was launched, and one of the experts, Lesha Blinov, knowing that I was an active fan, suggested: let's cooperate. There was a program with my participation, "The game of the head." I ask questions, listeners answer via SMS, and the presenters in the studio do not let you get bored.

At the same time, I came as a guest fan in the program “Football Aggravation” by Fedya Pogorelov, then he went to America to study for a year, I replaced him and took root. Fedya, when he returned, came up with another program for himself, and I continue to broadcast “Exacerbation”.

- What's interestnig clever man finds in football?
- Look, the game is an integral and, probably, a basic human need. At the same time, an important property of the game is that a person always understands that this has nothing to do with reality. We sat down at chess, and suddenly the house caught fire - it is clear that we will give up the game. But while the house is not on fire, we sit and play, although we have more important things to do, we could earn an extra penny. No, we sit and play. Because like it. As in the famous experiment with a rat, which was implanted with an electrode in the pleasure center in the brain, and she constantly pressed the button to stimulate this center, did not drink or eat.

Football is just one of the games. What do smart people see in it? Well, after all, it's not tic-tac-toe, where two moves and a draw, if you don't make stupid mistakes. In football, there is a place for personality to emerge. There is a place for aesthetic pleasure - football players can do with the ball what they cannot do ordinary people. This is a game of the mind, a game of coaches who select players in such a way as to push them strengths and to level the weak ones - there are no ideal football players ... Maybe only Cristiano Ronaldo. It is also a game with an opponent, a clash of wills and strategies.

- Well, yes, the game - and why are there such terrible fights in the fan environment?
- There is a whole subculture of near-football hooliganism, it has developed its own code of conduct. For example, they fight most often by agreement of the parties, in strict accordance with the dueling code. Such boxing in the fresh air. If I go, for example, to a match with Spartak in Moscow and even put on a Zenith rose at the same time ... well, maybe some fool will shine in my eye, this is also in the rules of the game ... But I should be seriously afraid for my life, no.

— Returning to the game: are there definitely unloved types of questions?
- Dislike for certain issues is individual. When we take a question, endorphins are released, you get physiological pleasure. But a momentary feeling of panic, when you don’t understand how to reason, gives an adrenaline or norepinephrine rush, and this is very unpleasant.

Personally, my worst questions are when, excuse me, some garbage is brought to the table: guess how it is used. Questions like “continue the quote of such and such” are close to me, because this is a “person-to-person” relationship, and when they take out garbage, there is no person. Thank God, we have Kapustin in our team: if we are given an incomprehensible object, Kapustin either knows how to use it, or twists it in his hands and guesses.

- Boris Kryuk said about you: this is not a player of knowledge, but a phenomenal solver. But knowledge is still needed. Do you read an encyclopedia, say?
- Not. You just have to be out of context. I'm sitting at work, I downloaded a package of questions from the database - I played. It's hard for me to play alone, so I either take the question in the first second or immediately open the answer.

- And remind me of some legendary something-where-sometimes question ...
- "About the hole", for example. The end of the seventies or the beginning of the eighties, the final of the year, the authors of the questions are in the studio. And one aunt behaved unpleasantly - well, she was the only one who was against the fact that the experts were credited with the answer to some question, not even hers. (I'm not saying that the lady herself is an unpleasant person - this could be a side effect live broadcast.) Finally, it was her turn to ask the question: “Leonardo asked: “What grows the more, the more they take away?” And from herself she added: “The answer begins from the end, and ends from the beginning.”

The question is simple - but experts are stupid for a whole minute. A schizoid way of thinking when you go around in a circle and are not able to get out of it: "Oh my God - I don't know - what it could be - I don't know." Everyone around you already guessed it... In fact, this is a separate format for viewing ChGK - watching the game, knowing the answer: you evaluate how close the players are to the truth. So, the minute has expired - and there is no answer. And Nurali Latypov, answering, suddenly at the last second: "The Pit." Then versions were born, allegedly experts knew the answer already in the first second, they simply teased the viewer, but this is not so.

- You once said a long time ago that small children should not be sent to all sorts of developing kindergartens. Do you still think so? By the way, what is the composition of your children?
- A boy and a girl ... I believe that it is impossible to develop children in a disharmonic way. When you gently direct a child somewhere (there is no question of forcing it), you need to understand whether you are doing this for him or for yourself. There are two poles where so many parents fall into: hypertrophied physical development or hypertrophied dry-intellectual. Are you teaching a four-year-old child to take integrals - and why? A child at four years old is not able to perceive abstractions, and emotional sphere, the ability to empathize you will “dry” him.

- A question from the female part of the editorial office: to “What? Where? When?" Do pairs often form?
- I would not say that there are many or few pairs. Yes, ChGK - I mean the movement in general - is a big hangout, people spend a lot of time together, sympathies arise that turn into relationships. Moreover, there are many couples from different cities: during the year people can meet six times at tournaments, play for three hours, there is nothing else to do - they go for a walk. In general, the environment is conducive. But on the other hand, people are smart, and intelligence actually borders on selfishness, and couples often break up. Because ... Yes, we are all difficult people.

City (St. Petersburg) 04.04.2005

Something, somewhere, for some reason, can “What? Where? When?" live your thirtieth birthday
This spring, the leadership of the TV company "Game" sat down at the gaming table of the program "What? Where? When?" instead of "experts" politicians and pop artists. Many did not like this - there was talk that the game, which turns 30 this year, has exhausted itself. Mikhail Moon, the owner of the Crystal Owl, who is no longer participating in What? Where? When?".
- Why did you leave?
- There are several reasons for the fact that I finished playing. Firstly, I am convinced that any player should be able to leave in time and beautifully. A rather strange goal is to sit at the table with a spinning top for as long as possible. I always wanted to participate in a beautiful game, and not remain Koshchei the Immortal. Secondly, the time has come: I played intermittently for eight years. This, in my opinion, is enough. And thirdly, 2005 is a jubilee year, the title of master will be played. This is a race with a huge prize at the end. To take part in it without the desire to win is unsportsmanlike. And I'm not very interested in playing anymore.
- Why?
- For most connoisseurs, the game is an opportunity for self-realization. Right now, I'm more productive at work. As long as I felt the desire to sit down at the gaming table - then the game was. But the last one for me is “What? Where? When?" last summer proved that I was never able to tune in. Last time I had this when I had to play two days after the death of my dog. But here there was a completely different situation, when there was simply no internal incentive for the game.
- How many times it happened that a connoisseur left the club, and after a few years returned again.
- Maybe I'll come back. Everything can change. Would like to repeat this. After all, the greatest pleasure is to take a question. This is akin to the joy of Mendeleev from the table opened in a dream. I don't really like connoisseur terminology, but there is a fairly accurate definition. When the team sorts through the versions, one suddenly pops up, and it becomes clear to everyone that it is she, in the club this is called a “click”. The moment of truth. For the sake of this moment, I advise everyone to play “What? Where? When?".
- Is it so easy to get there? How are players selected for the program?
- The right to form teams belongs to the heads of the TV company "Game". Sometimes they listen to the advice of experts, sometimes they act strictly against this advice. I don't know exactly how it is now. Previously, there was a more or less clear vertical and it was clearer how the selection took place.
- And How?
- Almost immediately after the release of the program, regional clubs began to appear all over the country. There people played for their pleasure, without any TV, without money. Then Voroshilov realized that he had provoked the movement of the masses. And the first congress of the International Association of Clubs “What? Where? When? ”, the so-called festivals began. They, in turn, replenished the first forge of ChGK personnel - the Brain Ring. It was a very high-quality screening, which took place almost in combat conditions. Filming of "The Brain" took place in inhuman conditions - four transfers a day. Players came to shoot every day. They didn't know if they would be allowed to play today or not, but they had to tune in every round because they could be called to play at any moment. Accordingly, it was a terrible psychological stress. Ten to the studio. Two shoots without a break. Then - lunch. Everyone runs to the dining room. There is only one dining room, and all three hundred people also have a break at the same time. So I had to run fast. Back to the studio, two more shots. Then - the hotel. Half a liter of vodka - to fall asleep, the next day - again the same thing. It was an existential high, and most players regret that they don't have to go through that again.
- Where did the "Brins" disappear to?
- "Game" refused "Brain-Ring", because none of the TV channels wants to buy it.
- And what is the secret of longevity of the “What? Where? When?"?
- Voroshilov is a genius. He largely determined the development trends of modern television. What we see now in the show of Larry Flynt and others - Vladimir Yakovlevich came up with long before them.
- Do you like what happens in “What? Where? When?" now?
- I do not know what would have happened if the "Game" had not chosen the current vector of development. After the death of Voroshilov, Boris Kryuk and Natalya Stetsenko found themselves in a monstrous situation. It's like being handed a Chinese Ming vase and offered to walk through a littered dark labyrinth without breaking it, because it is priceless. They had an enormous responsibility. So no one has the right to criticize what they are doing now.
- But they could refuse this responsibility.
And ruin everything? I believe that the game is valuable precisely because it lives. It seems to me that what we see today is unequivocally better care"What? Where? When?" from television. If the program were closed, it would be a disgusting monument to Voroshilov. I do not want and will not give an assessment of what and how Stetsenko and Kryuk did, but I am always on their side. The role of the keepers of the game fell on them like a ring on Frodo. This is a huge cross. And the fact that they continue to carry it is great. In whatever direction they turned with this cross.
- Nevertheless, the game has changed a lot, and not for the better ...
- I have a feeling that the game has acquired the format of the new time. She became very similar to the "Night Watch", "Turkish Gambit", "Weak Link" and even a little bit to the "Star Factory". But I can't say for certain that it wasn't inevitable.
- And how did you like the idea of ​​seating TV viewers and stars at the gaming table?
She looks disgusting to me. Take the question, you can experience this catharsis only in the game. It is valuable that during the discussion the team unites into a single organism, becomes something more than a meeting of six players. Because it is able not only to extract old knowledge, but also to create new ones. Voroshilov always emphasized this. Unfortunately, in the current series, I saw all the elements of “What? Where? When? ”, Except, in fact, the game. Everything was professional, except for those sitting at the table. They clearly couldn't get the buzz. Accordingly, they did not understand what the real “What? Where? When?".
- Honored experts occupy any positions in the "Game"?
- The only player who has taken a post in the TV company is Andrey Kozlov. All other official posts do not hold. Voroshilov initially took this position: never communicate with experts. And rightly so: tomorrow he will dip his face in the mud, and today he talks nicely with us.
- Hasn't it become more boring with the change of presenter?
- Ironically, Boris Kryuk, under Voroshilov, was just working with experts, talking with us. Naturally, when he became the leader, many tried to embarrass him, behaved with him even in a boorish way. But he proved at the very first games that this topic would not work. Periodically, it pops up, and again he has to dip someone in the muzzle into this very thing. But by and large, Hook passed Scylla and Charybdis successfully.
- They say you quarreled with Alexander Druz because he did not allow you to receive two "Crystal Owls". This is true?
- The truth is that Alexander Abramovich and I do not like each other. We have a certain mutual antipathy. And the "Crystal Owls" have nothing to do with it. My friend doesn't like me, doesn't like the way I play, and he, as a master, doesn't think that I deserve the main prize of the game. This is a completely normal position, and because of it we definitely did not quarrel. I wouldn't call it a conflict. I, for example, do not like Zyuganov and Khakamada. Maybe they don't like me either. Should I swear with them now, or what?
- You still received one "Owl". Does possessing it give anything?
- It seems to me that some experts I like respect me. Their attitude towards me is much better than the Crystal Owl. That is also why I left: if I began to go downhill, look pale, just serve my number at the table - I would be ashamed in front of these people.
- Do old players have jealousy towards young ones?
- Is it, except in Soviet films, there are situations when old people rejoice at the new shift? Put yourself in the place of an old worker who used his wrench to turn nuts in one direction for fifty years, and then a young specialist came after vocational school and begins to turn them in the other direction. And after the shift, he goes to drink beer, while everyone goes to drink port wine. Only sentries forgotten in the guard are glad to see the shift coming. "What? Where? When?" - a completely normal get-together in which people who are forced to coexist in the same space unite into interest groups. And I would not divide connoisseurs by age. And jealousy of newcomers, of course, is always there. Perhaps even me.

Member Name: Mikhail Valerievich Moon

Age (birthday): 25.02.1975

City: Gatchina, Leningrad region

Education: St. Petersburg State University, faculty applied mathematics and management processes

Family: married, has a son

Found an inaccuracy? Let's fix the questionnaire

Reading this article:

Radio host and trader Mikhail Moon is known to many primarily as one of the experts in the elite club “What? Where? When? ”, But what else is noteworthy in his biography?

Misha was born in the small town of Gatchina, located in the Leningrad Region..

Then his family moved to St. Petersburg, where he eventually graduated from gymnasium No. 171.

After school, the boy went to St. Petersburg State University, where in 1996 he received a diploma from the Faculty of Applied Mathematics and Control Processes.

Your romance with the game “What? Where? When?" the young man began as a child, when he looked forward to each issue and froze at the sound of Vladimir Voroshilov's voice. As soon as he entered the university, Mikhail immediately went to the club for sports ChGK called Kolomna.

It was there that Moon learned to take a punch, concentrate and go to victory without paying attention to anything around. It is in the sports version of “What? Where? When?" he played in the teams of such connoisseurs as Leonid Klimovich and Sergei Vivatenko.

On the big screen Mikhail first got in 1997 and immediately fell in love with the audience. They saw in him a very tactful, pleasant and incredibly erudite young man. The inquisitive mind of the young connoisseur was noted in 2002 by the presentation of the "Crystal Owl".

By the way, the connoisseur himself notes that he had a hand in obtaining owls by such connoisseurs as Dmitry Konovalenko, Rovshan Askerov and even Maxim Potashev.

In 2005, Moon announced that he was ending his career in the television version of the program, but cannot refuse the sports format. The connoisseur simply indicated his departure - the excitement was gone, and the slightly changed format of the program ceased to suit him. True, at that time, Mikhail noted that over time he could get bored and return, but so far this has not happened.

Since the same 2005, the intellectual was invited to the board of the International Association of Clubs “What? Where? When?". Moon agreed and stayed with it until 2009.

Among other television programs in which Mikhail Moon was noted, one can single out “Own Game” of the sample on April 19, 1995.

It cannot be said that the intellectual club is the only interest and occupation in Mikhail's life. There is a page dedicated to radio in his career - he is the host of two programs at once on Zenith radio.

These are “Football aggravation” and “Heading”. In serious professional activity Moon has such positions as:

• Trader JSC "Broker Firm Lenstroymaterialy";
• Trader of CJSC IC Energocapital.

On the this moment Mikhail is the director of the share markets department of Closed Joint Stock Company BFA.

The personal life of the connoisseur has long settled down - his wife's name is Anastasia Gusarova. This couple has a son.

The future owner of the "Crystal Owl" was born in Gatchina, after which the boy, along with his family, moved to northern capital. Here he studied at the 171st gymnasium, and then became a student at St. Petersburg State University. In 1996, Moon became the owner of a diploma from this prestigious university.

Becoming a connoisseur

As a schoolboy, Mikhail was a fan of the game “What? Where? When?". He followed every episode of this television program, and Vladimir Voroshilov was a real guru for Moon. After entering the university, he became a member of the Kolomna club, which participated in the sports What? Where? When?". During the games, Mikhail was always focused on achieving victory and was not distracted by what was happening in the hall. At that time he was a member of the teams of S. Vivatenko and L. Klimovich.

Moon's debut on television happened in 1997. The audience instantly fell in love with him. On the screen, he seemed an erudite and tactful young man with an inquisitive mind. In 2002, Mikhail received the Crystal Owl. According to him, M. Potashev, R. Askerov and D. Konovalenko had owls not without his help.

Pause in the game

In 2005, already as a well-known expert, he announced the end of his career in the television version of the intellectual club. Moon decided to focus on sportswear games. In an interview, Mikhail admitted about the loss of excitement and a modified transmission format that did not suit him. He noted that he prefers to leave “What? Where? When?" at the peak of his abilities and does not want to act as Koshchei the Immortal in the future. He always liked beautiful game, but at that time Moon stopped feeling it.
According to Mikhail, many experts are engaged in self-realization with the help of a popular program, and Moon decided to concentrate on his business activities. Moreover, he did not rule out that after a certain time he would return to the intellectual casino again. And that happened in 2006.
A year earlier International association clubs "What? Where? When?" invited Michael to her board, where he was for four years.

Moon winner

According to Moon, for a successful game, the team must become a single organism, and not just six experts gathered at the same table. He is sure that a lot depends on the captain, who must put the team members into a collective trance to concentrate on the game.

Michael claims that people in Everyday life concentrated on only 15%, and for the correct answer to the question, 100% return of all forces is required.

Moon is very fond of winning and compares the correct answer to a question with the joy of Mendeleev, who dreamed of the table. Mikhail likes that the TV program beloved by millions of viewers is changing, while not losing its main essence.
Except "What? Where? When "Moon in 1995 successfully took part in the program" Own game ".

Radio business and family

Intellectual casino is not the only hobby of the titled connoisseur. At one time, he was fascinated by radio. Mikhail acted as the host of the radio station "Zenith":

• "Head game";
• "Football review".

He also worked as a trader:

1. Energocapital Company.
2. Brokerage firm Lenstroymaterialy.

Then he was invited to the position of director in the Equity Markets Department big company"BFA".
At one time, Moon married Anastasia Gusarova, who bore him a son.

How do you feel about Michael Moon? We are waiting for your comments!

Lua error in Module:CategoryForProfession on line 52: attempt to index field "wikibase" (a nil value).

Biography

Graduated from gymnasium No. 171 of the city of St. Petersburg, in 1996 - St. Petersburg State University, Faculty of Applied Mathematics and Control Processes.

Worked as a trader in joint stock company"Broker Firm Lenstroymaterialy" and CJSC IC "Energocapital"; currently heads the Equity Markets Department at CJSC BFA.

"What? Where? When?"

Since 1991, he has been a member of various teams in a sports version. intellectual games"What? Where? When? "(until 1993 - in the team of Leonid Klimovich, then - in the team of Sergei Vivatenko). In the elite club since 1997.

In the autumn of 2002 he received the Crystal Owl prize. From 2005 to 2009 he was a member of the Board of the IAC.

In 2005, he announced his departure from the television club “What? Where? When?" , but did not stop participating in sports What? Where? When? . He again began performing in the TV club already in 2006. At the moment (November 2015) has a win-loss ratio in the club of 61.11% (36 games, 22 wins).

Write a review on the article "Moon, Mikhail Valerievich"

Notes

Links

An excerpt characterizing Moon, Mikhail Valerievich