Charter of the international association in the field of collective management of rights “Eurasian Confederation of Societies of Rightholders. Anniversary meeting of the Russian Association of International Law Goals and scope of the association

an international non-governmental scientific organization established in Brussels in 1873. A. m. p. has a consultative status with organizations of the UN system - ECOSOC, UNESCO, IMO, UNCTAD. According to the Statute of the A. m. p. is called upon to promote the progressive development international law, its conscientious application, unification of law and elimination of conflicts of laws.

Great Definition

Incomplete definition ↓

INTERNATIONAL LAW ASSOCIATION

1) established in 1873 (Brussels), a non-governmental international organization of a scientific and applied nature, whose goals are to study the patterns of development international relations, promoting the progressive development of international public law and international private law, preparing proposals for interested governments to resolve international legal problems and achieve mutual understanding between peoples.

Originally (until 1895) called the Association for the Reform and Codification of the Law of Peoples, A.m.p. during its existence has had a serious positive impact on the formation of many institutions of modern international law. This was expressed, for example, in the creation, with the direct participation of legal scholars from all continents and legal schools united under its auspices, such organizations as the Hague Conference on Private International Law (1893), which is still in force today, International Institute on the unification of private law under the Council of the League of Nations - UNIDROIT (1928), the UN Commission on International Trade Law - UNCITRAL (1996). Based on the applied developments of these organizations, numerous conventions have been adopted and are effectively operating, aimed at eliminating conflicts of national legislation in the field of family, inheritance, financial law, intellectual property, international trade, transport, tourism, international civil procedure, arbitration proceedings, etc. The charter of A.m.p. provides for the possibility of participation in its work on the terms of individual and collective membership of jurists-theorists, lawyers-practitioners, lawyers, employees of law enforcement, law enforcement and legislative bodies of state power various countries, political and public figures, diplomats, representatives of higher education professors.

Organizational structure A.m.p. includes the Conference convened once every two years - the main representative body, the Administrative Council - the main executive body, consisting of the president of the Association and the chairmen of the national branches, as well as specialized committees operating on a permanent basis, each of which develops issues in one of the branches of the international public or private law, prepares reports for their consideration at regular congresses, drafts of international regulations. Location of the headquarters of the A.m.p. - London.

2) The Russian Association of International Law (until 1991 - Soviet A.m.p.), formed on April 17, 1957 in accordance with the decision of the Presidium of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR and other decision-making authorities, an independent public organization whose goals are to

measures to promote the strengthening and enhancement of the role of progressive principles and norms of international law. important place in the activities of the Russian A.m.p. is to stimulate the development of the science of international law in the country, as well as to familiarize the general scientific community, applied workers with the latest ideas in the field of international jurisprudence, with the activities of interstate organizations, with international legal acts, the progress of work of diplomatic conferences, bilateral contacts of certain countries on legal issues. The constant attention of the Russian A.m.p. focused on increasing the scientific potential of international lawyers in the course of their training at universities, postgraduate studies, in such specialized training centers for international lawyers as the Moscow state institute international relations, Diplomatic Academy of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation.

A solid contribution to the development of international law is associated with the names of many of its members, known for their activities in International Court of Justice UN (F.I. Kozhevnikov, V.S. Vereshchetin), the UN Commission of International Law (G.I. Tunkin, N.A. Ushakov, I.I. Lukashuk), the main bodies of the UN, its specialized agencies, other interstate organizations (A. P. Movchan, V.I. Sobakin, G.N. Piradov, G.P. Zhukov, O.N. Khlestov), ​​as well as at major diplomatic conferences (S.B. Krylov, E.N. Durdenevsky, S. V. Molodtsov, Y. M. Kolosov, E. T. Usenko, G. B. Starushenko, B. M. Klimenko, I. P. Blishchenko, etc.). The main bodies of the Russian A.m.p.: the annual general meeting of its members, elected for a period of 3 years, the Executive Committee, which includes an operational body - the Bureau of the Executive Committee, the Audit Commission, the Editorial Board, as well as specialized committees working on a permanent basis (all of them 31), whose tasks include preparing materials for hearing at general meetings in relevant areas of science of international law (public and private). The press organ of the Russian A.m.p. - Russian Yearbook of International Law (until 1991 - Soviet Yearbook of International Law).

Great Definition

Incomplete definition ↓

From June 28 to June 30, the 60th annual meeting of the Russian Association of International Law (RAMP) was held in the building of the Moscow Arbitration Court. The event was attended by MGIMO professors.

The general theme of this anniversary all-Russian exchange of international lawyers is the results of their scientific research- "Formation and development of modern international law". RAMP brings together individual and collective members of the Association from all over Russia.

The meeting was attended by professors, leading employees research centers, civil servants, practicing lawyers and foreign guests. They met for a lively and interested conversation about the pressing problems of international law, its rapid multidirectional evolution, to discuss how to respond to cases of its violation, especially cases of flagrant disregard for its requirements, and what to do to ensure that the ideals of the rule of law triumph in international relations and at the national level.

Even the titles of the reports testify to this. Here are just a few of them: “Basic principles of international law and revolution” (S.V. Chernichenko), “Human rights and modern international law” (V.A. Kartashkin), “EAEU Court: from legal position to current law” ( T.N. Neshataeva), “International Law in the Transition to a Multipolar World: Actual Problems of Science” (A.Ya. Kapustin), “Issues of the Correlation of International and Domestic Law in the Practice of the Supreme Court Russian Federation"(B.L. Zimnenko).

The most active part in ensuring success international conference accepted by representatives of MGIMO. One of the key plenary sessions "Modern International Law: Challenges, Problems and Prospects for Development" was moderated by the head of the Department of International Law A.N. Vylegzhanin.

M. L. Entin, Head of the Department of European Law, made a report “Institutional Lessons of the Crisis in Relations between Russia and the EU”. In his speech, he substantiated the need to restore certain elements of the management system for bilateral cooperation between Russia and the EU on a fundamentally new organizational and legal basis and use the negative and positive experience of its functioning in the further institutional development of the EAEU, CSTO, SCO and others. international organizations and structures with Russian participation.

The representatives of the editorial board of the Moscow Journal of International Law offered the authors of the most informative scientific reports and reports presented at the RAMP Meeting to prepare (on the topics of such reports and messages voiced) detailed articles for publication in the journal.

During the meeting of the RAMP, a meeting was held between the editor-in-chief of the Moscow Journal of International Law, Professor A.N. Vylegzhanin, and the editor-in-chief of Jus Gentium (Journal of International Legal History), Professor W. Butler. The meeting discussed issues of interest for the development of both journals.

At the end of the RAMP Meeting, professor of St. Petersburg University L. Galenskaya made constructive proposals and some critical remarks. socialist revolution, which Russia lives in 2017, is not specifically reflected in the topic of the RAMP Meeting.

PREAMBLE

Proceeding from the growing interdependence of peoples and countries of the modern world;

emphasizing the paramount importance of the joint efforts of the entire world community in order to prevent and resolve international conflicts and wars, ensure the protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms, protect and restore the environment, and solve social and humanitarian problems;

given the growing role played in modern conditions non-governmental organizations;

Noting the key role of the United Nations in maintaining peace, ensuring security and developing comprehensive international cooperation in all areas;

Considering support for the activities of the UN as its main task and striving to increase the contribution of the Russian public to the implementation of the lofty goals and principles proclaimed in the UN Charter, the Conference adopted this Charter of the International Public Organization of the Russian United Nations Association, which is the legal successor and successor of the United Nations Association in the USSR, established 2 March 1956 in Moscow.

ARTICLE 1. GENERAL PROVISIONS

1.1. The international public organization "Russian Association for UN Assistance" (abbreviated as RAS UN), hereinafter referred to as the Association, is a voluntary, international public organization operating on the territory of the Russian Federation, at the location of the Representative Office of the UN RAS in New York, USA, as well as in other states where structural subdivisions of the Association will be created.

1.2. In its activities, the Association is guided by the Constitution of the Russian Federation, the current legislation of the Russian Federation and this Charter, as well as the principles of democracy, voluntariness, openness, equality, self-government, legality. The Association is a legal entity from the moment of state registration, has a settlement and currency accounts, can acquire property and personal non-property rights on its own behalf, bear obligations, act as a plaintiff and defendant in court.

1.3. The Association has its own seal, forms and other details, approved in accordance with the procedure established by law. The Association is not responsible for the obligations of its members. Members of the Association are not liable for its obligations.

1.4. The Association carries out, in accordance with the current legislation of the Russian Federation, the possession, use and disposal of property owned by it or transferred to it in accordance with the goals and objectives of its activities.

1.5. The location of the Central Board of the Association is Moscow.

ARTICLE 2. OBJECTIVES

2.1. To contribute in every possible way to the achievement of the goals and principles proclaimed by the UN Charter, to increase the effectiveness of the activities of the Security Council, the General Assembly and other UN bodies based on the adaptation of the UN Charter to the new world realities, and to develop a movement in support of the UN.

2.2. Support the desire of peoples for mutual understanding and joint action in the name of peace, disarmament, and the resolution of international disputes and conflicts by peaceful means.

2.3. Actively participate in the strengthening of trust and friendship between states and peoples, promote conscientious implementation obligations under international treaties to which the Russian Federation is a party, enhancing the role of international law, social and economic progress, respect for human rights and solving global, regional, national and local problems.

2.4. Pay special attention to the involvement of young people in the activities of the Association and active participation in the implementation of the programs of the Association.

2.5. To develop and strengthen cooperation with the UN Associations of other states in every possible way.

ARTICLE 3. OBJECTIVES

3.1. Acquaints the public with topical issues of activity through holding meetings, lectures, exhibitions, publishing books, brochures, publishing articles, using the media.

3.2. Cooperates with the relevant bodies and specialized agencies of the UN, as well as with international and national organizations pursuing the goal of increasing the effectiveness of the UN and its role in world affairs.

3.3. Conducts independently and in cooperation with other public organizations, as well as organizations and institutions of the UN system, conferences, seminars, round tables, and other events on topical issues of the UN.

3.4. Facilitates the involvement of the scientific community for research on topical issues of the UN activities, publication of articles by scientists in various bulletins, analytical collections.

3.5. Facilitates the coordination of the activities of other public organizations in carrying out activities related to the activities of the UN and aimed at the implementation of its goals and principles.

3.6. Promotes the participation of the general public in the work of the UN by non-governmental organizations.

3.7. He is a member of the World Federation of United Nations Associations, actively participates in its activities and cooperates with the National United Nations Associations of other countries.

ARTICLE 4. RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS OF THE ASSOCIATION

4.1 Carrying out its activities, the Association and its legal and individuals, in order to solve statutory tasks and in accordance with the legislation of the Russian Federation, have the right to:

— make various kinds of transactions and other legal acts, create enterprises, have their own publications and carry out publishing activities within Russia and abroad;

- build, acquire, alienate, take and lease movable and immovable property;

- conclude contracts, acquire property and personal, non-property rights;

- carry out other forms economic activity not prohibited by law;

- independently spend their money credited to ruble and foreign currency accounts, use loans in rubles and foreign currency;

- act as a plaintiff and defendant in court;

— participate in the work of organizations whose activities contribute to the implementation of the goals and objectives of the Association.

4.2. The Association is obliged:

Publish an annual report on its activities and ensure the availability of familiarization with the said report;

- annually inform the Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation about the continuation of its activities and about changes in the location of the governing body and the composition of the leadership.

ARTICLE 5. GOVERNING AND CONTROL BODIES OF THE ASSOCIATION

5.1. The General Conference of the Association (hereinafter referred to as the Conference) is its highest governing body, is convened at least once every four years (the convening of the Conference, its agenda is announced no later than two months before the start);

a) accepts: the Charter of the Association, makes changes and additions to it, which are then registered, in the manner prescribed by law; resolutions, appeals and other documents on topical issues;

b) elects: the President of the Association for a period of four years - a person who has special merits to the organization, and, if necessary, one or two vice-presidents; Chairman of the Association for a period of 4 years, who is the head responsible for the current activities of the organization; the first Deputy Chairman for a period of 4 years, who is the head of the Secretariat, Vice-Chairmen for a period of 4 years, each of which is responsible for one of the main areas of activity; Central Board of the Association for a period of 4 years; Audit Commission for a period of 4 years;

c) hears and discusses: Report of the Central Board on the activities of the Association for the period between conferences and makes a decision on it; Report of the Audit Commission and approves it;

e) decisions of the Conference are taken by a simple majority of votes, with the exception of decisions to change the Charter or liquidate the Association, which are taken by a qualified (2/3) number of votes of delegates;

f) an extraordinary Conference may be convened, if urgent decisions are needed, at the request of 2/3 of the members of the Association, the Central Board or the Audit Commission and is valid in the presence of more than half of the total number of elected delegates.

5.2. The President of the Association is its supreme leader:

a) ensures the compliance of its activities with the Charter;

b) controls the work at all levels, submits any issues for consideration by the governing bodies of the Association;

c) participates in meetings of all bodies of the Association with a voting right;

d) represents the Association in relations with state and public organizations within the country and abroad.

5.3. The Chairman of the Association carries out general management of its activities:

a) ensures the implementation of the decisions adopted by the Conference;

b) heads the Central Board and the Presidium, chairs their meetings;

c) represents the Association in relations with state and public organizations in the country and abroad.

5.4. The Central Board is the main governing body of the Association in the periods between Conferences, is elected for a period of four years:

a) considers any issues of the Association's activities, including the opening of branches and representative offices and the appointment of their heads, and makes decisions on them, provided that more than half of its members are present at the meetings;

b) is authorized, in case of emergencies that hinder the convening of the Conference, to make decisions by a majority of at least 2/3 of its composition on the issues of changing the Charter and the status of the Association with subsequent approval at the Extraordinary Conference, which is convened within three months from the moment such decisions are made;

c) creates commissions and working groups for the main activities of the Association;

d) hears and approves the annual reports of the Presidium and the Audit Commission on the activities of the Association, annual plans, budget for the coming year;

e) coordinates the activities of regional branches, hears reports on their work;

f) meetings are convened once a year, decisions are made by the majority of the members present at the meeting;

g) elects the Presidium of the Association of no more than 15 people. It consists ex officio of the President, Vice-President, Chairman, First Deputy, Vice-Chairmen of the Association, as well as other members elected by the Central Board.

5.5. The Presidium of the Association is elected for a period of four years:

a) is convened four times a year, its meetings are competent if more than half of the members participate in their work, decisions are made by a simple majority of votes;

b) performs the functions of the Central Board during the period between its meetings;

c) exercises the right of a legal entity on behalf of the Association.

5.6. Secretariat of the Association - the apparatus for conducting current work, headed by the First Deputy Chairman, candidates for the staff of the apparatus are selected on a competitive basis, approved by the Presidium; Responsible Secretary of the Association - appointed by the Chairman:

a) manages the business of the Association;

b) prepares materials for meetings of the Conference, the Central Board, the Presidium and for all meetings of the Association;

c) prepares financial documents for payment together with the accountant.

5.7. Audit Commission of the Association:

(a) be elected by and accountable to the Conference;

b) monitors the compliance of the activities of the Association with the goals and objectives, controls the correctness and expediency of spending money, organizing accounting and reporting;

c) inform the Conferences and the Central Board of the results of the audits;

d) have the right to request, and the relevant officials are obliged to provide it with all the necessary financial, accounting and other documents;

e) conducts its scheduled inspections at least once a year, and, if necessary, may conduct unscheduled revisions and inspections;

f) it cannot include members of the governing bodies of the Association.

ARTICLE b. BOARD OF TRUSTEES

6.1. The Board of Trustees includes representatives of organizations that provide special support to the Association in the implementation of its program activities. The Board of Trustees is formed by the Central Board for a period of four years.

ARTICLE 7. MEMBERSHIP IN THE ASSOCIATION. RIGHTS AND DUTIES OF MEMBERS

7.1. Members of the Association may be citizens of the Russian Federation, Foreign citizens, persons with dual citizenship and stateless persons who share its goals and objectives. Membership is voluntary. Members of the Association may be legal entities- public associations.

7.2. Admission to the Association is carried out by the Presidium of the Association or the relevant branch on the basis of an application - for citizens and a decision of the governing body - for legal entities.

7.3. Members of the Association have the right:

— elect and be elected to the governing bodies of the Association;

— participate in all events held by the Association;

- use the property of the Association, equipment, literature in the prescribed manner to fulfill the statutory goals and objectives;

– each member of the Association may at any time freely withdraw from the members of the Association, notifying the Presidium or the authorized body of the corresponding branch of the Association in writing;

- submit proposals on all issues of its activities for consideration by the governing bodies of the Association and participate in their discussion.

7.4. Members of the Association are obliged:

— comply with the provisions of this Charter and contribute to its implementation;

— in their activities be guided by the decisions taken by the General Conference, the Central Board and the President of the Association;

— protect the property of the Association, be creative in search of sources of funding, new methods of work for the successful solution of the tasks facing the Association.

7.5. A member of the Association may be expelled from the membership of the Association by the decision of the Presidium of the Association, if his activities are contrary to the provisions of the Charter or cause moral or material damage to the activities of the Association.

ARTICLE 8. STRUCTURE OF THE ASSOCIATION

8.1. The structure of the Association is formed by its subdivisions - organizations, departments, branches and representative offices on the territory of the Russian Federation and abroad:

a) Regional offices may act both on the basis of this Charter and on the basis of their own charters adopted by the highest governing bodies of organizations and departments - general meetings (conferences). From the moment of state registration, in accordance with the procedure established by law, organizations and branches acquire the right of a legal entity;

b) Structural subdivisions of the Association adopt their charter, which should not contradict the main provisions of this Charter;

c) The supreme governing body of a branch or organization is the General Meeting (conference) convened by the chairman (head) as needed, but at least once a year. The general meeting (conference) is authorized to resolve any issues related to the activities of the organization or department, the following issues are within the exclusive competence of the general meeting (conference):

- creation, liquidation, reorganization of a branch or organization;

- election of the chairman (head) of the department or organization;

— election of delegates to the Conference of the Association;

ARTICLE 10. REORGANIZATION AND TERMINATION OF THE ASSOCIATION

10.1. The Association may be reorganized by merger, acquisition, division, spin-off or transformation in accordance with the current legislation of the Russian Federation.

10.2. The activities of the Association may be terminated by liquidation by decision of the Conference or by a court decision in the manner prescribed by the current legislation of the Russian Federation.

10.3. The decision of the Conference on reorganization or liquidation is considered adopted if more than 2/3 of the total number of delegates present at the Conference voted for it.

10.4. Upon liquidation of the Association, the property and funds remaining after the satisfaction of creditors' claims are directed to the purposes provided for by this Charter. The decision on the use of the residual property is published in the press by the liquidation commission.

10.5. The Association ensures the accounting and safety of the documents of the Association upon termination of its activities and timely transfers them, in accordance with the procedure established by law, to the state storage.

What is an "international law association"? How to spell correctly given word. Concept and interpretation.

international law association 1) established in 1873 (Brussels), a non-governmental international organization of a scientific and applied nature, whose goals are to study the patterns of development of international relations, promote the progressive development of international public law and international private law, prepare proposals for interested governments to resolve international legal problems and the achievement of mutual understanding between peoples. during its existence has had a serious positive impact on the formation of many institutions of modern international law. This was expressed, for example, in the creation, with the direct participation of legal scholars from all continents and legal schools united under its auspices, of such organizations as the Hague Conference on Private International Law (1893), the International Institute for the Unification of Private Law under the Council of the League of Nations - UNIDROIT (1928 ), United Nations Commission on International Trade Law - UNCITRAL (1996). Based on the applied developments of these organizations, numerous conventions have been adopted and are effectively operating, aimed at eliminating conflicts of national legislation in the field of family, inheritance, financial law, intellectual property, international trade, transport, tourism, international civil procedure, arbitration proceedings, etc. The charter of A.m.p. it provides for the possibility of participation in its work on the terms of individual and collective membership of jurists-theorists, lawyers-practitioners, lawyers, law enforcement, law enforcement and legislative bodies of state power of various countries, political and public figures, diplomats, representatives of higher education professors. Organizational structure of A.m.p.; includes the Conference convened once every two years - the main representative body, the Administrative Council - the main executive body, consisting of the president of the Association and the chairmen of the national branches, as well as specialized committees operating on a permanent basis, each of which develops issues in one of the branches of the international public or private law, prepares reports for their consideration at regular congresses, drafts of international regulations. Location of the headquarters of the A.m.p. - London. 2) Russian Association of International Law (until 1991 - Sovetskaya A.m.p.), formed on April 17, 1957 in accordance with the decision of the Presidium of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR and other decision-making authorities, an independent public organization, the goals of which are to promote in every possible way the strengthening and enhancement of the role of progressive principles and norms of international law . An important place in the activities of the Russian A.M.P. is occupied by stimulating the development of the science of international law in the country, as well as familiarizing the general scientific community, applied workers with the latest ideas in the field of international jurisprudence, with the activities of interstate organizations, with international legal acts, the progress of work diplomatic conferences, bilateral contacts of certain countries on legal issues. The constant attention of the Russian A.M.p. focused on increasing the scientific potential of international lawyers in the course of their training at universities, postgraduate studies, in such specialized training centers for international lawyers as the Moscow State Institute of International Relations, the Diplomatic Academy of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation. A solid contribution to the development of international law is associated with the names of many of its members, known for their work in the International Court of Justice (F.I. Kozhevnikov, V.S. Vereshchetin), the UN International Law Commission (G.I. Tunkin, N.A. Ushakov, I. I. Lukashuk), the main bodies of the UN, its specialized agencies, other interstate organizations (A.P. Movchan, V.I. Sobakin, G.N. Piradov, G.P. Zhukov, O.N. Khlestov ), as well as at major diplomatic conferences (S.B. Krylov, E.N. Durdenevsky, S.V. Molodtsov, Yu.M. Kolosov, E.T. Usenko, G.B. Starushenko, B.M. Klimenko, I.P. Blishchenko and others). The main bodies of the Russian A.M.p.: the annual general meeting of its members, elected for a period of 3 years, the Executive Committee, which includes an operational body - the Bureau of the Executive Committee, the Audit Commission, the Editorial Board, as well as specialized committees working on a permanent basis (there are 31 in total), whose tasks include preparing materials for hearing at general meetings in relevant areas of science of international law (public and private). The press organ of the Russian A.M.p. - Russian Yearbook of International Law (until 1991 - Soviet Yearbook of International Law).,.. . \" Russian A.M.p. - a collective member of A.M.p. since 1957. From the moment of its foundation until his death in 1993, the post of Chairman of the Russian A.M.p. is prof. Kolodkin A.L., Volosov M.E.

Russian Association of International Law

Review of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Russian Association of International Law (June 25–27, 2014)

The analytical review considers reports and speeches made at the 57th Annual Meeting of the Russian Association of International Law on June 25-27, 2014.

Korbut L. V. REVIEW OF THE 57TH ANNUAL MEETING OF THE RUSSIAN INTERNATIONAL LAW ASSOCIATION (JUNE 25-27, 2014)

The Review focuses on researching reports and presentations made at the 57th Annual Meeting of the Russian Association of International Law on June 25-27, 2014.

On June 25, the Meeting was opened by Doctor of Law, Professor, President of the Association A. Ya. Kapustin. In his speech, he expressed gratitude to S. Yu. Chucha, Doctor of Law, Chairman of the Moscow Arbitration Court, for his help in organizing and holding the Meeting, important aspects program of the Meeting and gave the floor for greetings to the Deputy Chairman of the Arbitration Court of the City of Moscow L. A. Gaverdovskaya.

L. A. Gaverdovskaya greeted the participants of the Meeting on behalf of the management and judiciary of the Moscow Arbitration Court and wished fruitful work, interesting discussions, solving problems and new scientific research that contributes to the development of international law and its effective application.

Then Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary, Director of the Legal Department of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Russia K. G. Gevorgyan addressed the participants of the meeting with a greeting, who read out the greeting of the Minister of Foreign Affairs S. V. Lavrov.

Academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Director of the Institute of State and Law of the Russian Academy of Sciences A. G. Lisitsyn-Svetlanov wished successful work to all participants of the Meeting both on his own behalf and on behalf of the Institute of State and Law of the Russian Academy of Sciences, as well as on behalf of the Department of Social Sciences of the Russian academy of sciences.

Doctor of Law, Professor, Deputy of the State Duma of the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation V. N. Likhachev conveyed official greetings on behalf of State Duma Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation. He noted that last year was saturated with the search for concepts and mechanisms for the most effective application of the norms of international law.

Head of Staff of the Association of Lawyers of Russia S. V. Alexandrov conveyed words of greeting from the co-chairman of the Association of Lawyers of Russia, Doctor of Law, Professor S. V. Stepashin, who for many years hosted the annual meetings of the Association within the walls of the Accounts Chamber of the Russian Federation and noted that the annual meetings Associations are excellent events for the transfer of knowledge and experience from older generations to younger generations of international lawyers.

Then he read out the greeting of the Chairman of the Association of Lawyers of Russia, Chairman of the Committee of the State Duma of the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation on Civil, Criminal, Arbitration and Procedural Legislation, Honored Lawyer of the Russian Federation, Doctor of Law, Professor P. V. Krasheninnikov.

Deputy Minister of Justice of the Russian Federation M. A. Travnikov, on his own behalf and on behalf of the Minister of Justice of the Russian Federation A. V. Konovalov, expressed gratitude for the opportunity to take part in the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association and expressed his wish to strengthen the interaction of the Russian Association of International Law with the Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation, both within the framework of the scientific advisory council and within the framework of activities under the auspices of the Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation.

Bruno Uskin, Deputy Head of the Regional Delegation of the International Committee of the Red Cross in the Russian Federation, Belarus and Moldova, delivered a welcoming speech.

Then Doctor of Law, Professor, Deputy Chairman of the Court of the Eurasian economic community T.N. Neshatayeva considered some issues of the Treaty on the Eurasian Economic Union, signed in Astana on May 29, 2014.

After that, a plenary session "Generally recognized principles and norms of international law in the context of globalization" was held under the guidance of Doctor of Law, Professor E. G. Lyakhov.

Doctor of Law, Professor O. I. Tiunov made a presentation “The principle of sovereign equality of states in the system of norms of modern international law”.

He noted that in recent times the opinion is expressed that in connection with the creation of numerous integration systems, states lose part of their sovereignty. However, one cannot agree with the point of view that the transfer of any powers by the states to an integration entity means the loss of part of their sovereignty.

Doctor of Law, Professor S. V. Chernichenko made a presentation on "Imperative Norms and Generally Recognized Principles of International Law".

The speaker noted that the concept of "imperative norms" does not appear in the Constitution of the Russian Federation. However, this does not mean that the concept of “imperative norms” is absent in the Russian legal system.

Doctor of Law, Professor L. N. Galenskaya made a presentation “International Arbitration: History and Development Trends”.

The speaker noted that for a long time arbitration developed in parallel with mediation.

AT late XIX in. with the creation of the arbitral tribunal, a permanent arbitration body appears, which is sometimes called the Permanent Court of Arbitration.

Currently, the process of nationalization of arbitration as an institution for resolving disputes is underway. Arbitration tribunals become dependent on states that specify how arbitration should proceed.

Doctor of Law, Professor V. A. Kartashkin made a presentation "Reforming the human rights mechanisms of the United Nations in the context of globalization."

The speaker noted that recent decades the activities of the General Assembly of the United Nations have changed. The United Nations General Assembly adopts normative resolutions that come into force only after they have been ratified by States.

Doctor of Law, Professor A. A. Moiseev made a presentation "Globalization and International Law". He noted that, by its very nature, international law is global law. The term "globalization" appeared in the 1990s. The emergence of globalization was associated with the perception of the rules of a market economy by all states of the world, as well as the emergence of the Internet in 1991 as a public network.

At present, globalization is objective. Of greatest interest is the economic component of globalization. The advantages of globalization are associated with ensuring the stability of the economies of states. The disadvantages of globalization are related to the fact that the only goal of globalization in the economic sphere is to make a profit, which negatively affects social sphere and security.

Doctor of Law, Professor O. I. Ivonina made a presentation "The problem of the international legal personality of the state in the new world order."

She noted that the concept of a new world order appeared as a response to the objective processes of globalization and became widespread in the Western science of international law.

Head of the Department of International Law of the Moscow state university them. M. V. Lomonosov Ph.D. in Law, Associate Professor A. S. Ispolinov made a presentation “The Constitutional Courts of the countries of the Eurasian Economic Union and the Eurasian legal order”.

He drew attention to the fact that the formation of the Eurasian legal order is currently taking place. More than 90 international treaties have been concluded, more than 750 decisions of the Eurasian Economic Commission have been adopted, there are numerous decisions of the Court of the Eurasian Economic Union.

The constitutional courts of the countries of the Customs Union were very wary of the new legal order, since norms appear in national law, the constitutionality of which the constitutional courts do not control.

Candidate of Legal Sciences, Associate Professor A. M. Barnashov made a report "On international treaties of constitutional and legal significance."

The speaker noted that in the system of international legal regulation of particular importance are international treaties with constitutional and legal content, which have a significant impact on the development of various branches of law. In a number of cases, international treaties require adjustments to the text of the constitution, and even its revision.

Candidate of Legal Sciences, Professor N. I. Malysheva made a presentation "On the theoretical origins of understanding the rule of law in international law."

She noted that legality could be seen as an idea, principle or legal regime. In modern international law, legality presupposes compliance with imperative norms, the provisions of the Charter of the United Nations.

Candidate of Legal Sciences, Associate Professor R. Sh. Davletgildeev made a presentation "The influence of civilizational features on the functioning of international labor law."

In the modern world, along with globalization, there are also processes of regionalization. In this regard, some features of international labor law are being formed.

Among the civilizational features of international labor law, one can note the features of labor rights, migration features, etc.

Then a plenary session "Actual problems of international law in the context of globalization" was held under the guidance of Doctor of Law, Professor O. I. Tiunov.

PhD in Law, Associate Professor N. V. Afonichkina made a presentation “Legal Conditions for the People's Exercise of the Right to Self-Determination in the Light of the International Legal Principle of Equal Rights and Self-Determination of Peoples and Nations”.

She drew attention to the fact that one of the urgent problems of modern international law is the problem of self-determination of peoples. The principle of equality and self-determination of peoples was enshrined in Part 2 of Art. 1 of the Charter of the United Nations and detailed in many international legal instruments.

Professor B. M. Ashavsky made a presentation “The Doctrine of International Law at the Present Stage”. He noted that in the early stages of the development of international law, there were a small number of international treaties, and in this regard, the doctrine was one of the main sources of international law.

In the doctrine of international law at the present stage, many concepts are not used quite correctly. For example, the term "legality" refers to the internal law of States and therefore the concept of "international legality" is inappropriate in international law. The term "soft law", which refers to a set of resolutions of a recommendatory nature, should also not be used in international law.

Doctor of Law, Professor E. G. Lyakhov made a report "The subjects of ensuring the security of the world community." The speaker noted that at present the security threats to the world community are quite real.

In this regard, he considered the following issues: the concept and main components of security; the state as a political and legal mechanism and an object of security; the concept of the world community; modern threats to the security of the state and the world community; political and legal foundations for ensuring the security of states; international legal support for the preservation and protection of the world community, etc.

Candidate of Legal Sciences N. M. Bevelikova made a presentation “International Legal Problems of Integration in Asia in the Context of Globalization”. The speaker noted that in the system of international relations, all big role BRICS countries are playing - Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa. In this regard, she considered some aspects of the status and activities of the BRICS.

PhD in Law, Associate Professor A. R. Kayumova made a presentation “Jurisdictional Grounds for Initiating Criminal Cases on the Situation in Ukraine: Principles of Universality and Protection”.

The speaker discussed some of the legal grounds for the criminal cases initiated by the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation in connection with the situation in Ukraine.

PhD in Law, Candidate political science, Associate Professor K. L. Sazonova in the report “The Law of International Responsibility: Searching for Answers to the Questions “Who is to Blame?” and "what to do?" noted that the topic of the law of international responsibility was complex and very broad.

The most important problems of the law of international responsibility include the following: the obsolescence of the doctrine of the law of international responsibility in connection with the emergence of new concepts, such as the concept of humanitarian intervention; disorder of norms and concepts of the law of international responsibility; problems of implementation of the law of international responsibility; insufficient development of responsibility for serious violations of obligations arising from peremptory norms of general international law, etc.

Professor W. Butler made a presentation on the topic "Freedom of the Seas and Gerard de Reyneval". He noted that the 1811 study of the high-ranking French diplomat Gerard de Reyneval on the freedom of the seas touched on issues directly related to the Anglo-American conflict. Among others, this work explored the problems of claiming maritime territories, freedom of the sea, etc.

Candidate of Law, Associate Professor Kuan Zengjun made a presentation on "Delimitation of maritime spaces between China and its neighboring states."

The speaker noted that China is a continental maritime power. The total length of China's sea coastline is 17,000 kilometers. China borders on the sea with eight states. In this regard, China has always paid special attention to the delimitation of maritime spaces between China and its neighboring states.

Doctor of Law, Professor G. M. Melkov made a presentation “On insufficient coverage of the problems of military navigation in Russian science international law". The speaker noted that in the scientific literature on international law, insufficient attention was paid to legal status warships.

Then a round table was held jointly with the European Association of International Law "International legal problems of activities in the polar regions" under the leadership of Doctor of Law, Professor A. N. Vylegzhanin and Vice-President of the European Association of International Law A. Nolkemper.

Professor Timo Koivurova made a presentation "Protection of the Arctic environment - approaches to the strategy of environmental protection in the Arctic and the Arctic Council". The speaker noted that joint efforts of the Arctic states are needed to protect the Arctic environment.

Professor Nele Matz-Luk, in her presentation “Marine Living Resources”, drew attention to the fact that the issue of marine living resources is very acute in the Arctic region. At the same time, new international legal agreements are needed to regulate the issues of marine living resources.

Doctor of Law V. S. Kotlyar in his report “Political and international legal advantages and problems that may arise for the Russian Federation in connection with the intensification of the operation of the Northern Sea Route” drew attention to the fact that at present the international community has become much more actively use the Northern Sea Route.

Doctor of Law, Professor Yu. N. Maleev made a presentation “On the Law of Environmental Protection in the Arctic Region”. The speaker noted that the situation in the oil and gas sector in the Arctic region is very difficult.

At the same time, by the time Russia has created all the necessary infrastructure, oil and gas reserves in the Arctic will have already been depleted. In this regard, the question of whether Russia should participate in the development of Arctic resources remains open.

Doctor of Law, Professor V.F. Tsarev in his message “ general characteristics the international legal status of the Arctic” noted that recently there have been publications on the legal aspects of the status of the Arctic, based on the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea.

Professor Lauri Malksoo in his report “Russian Legal Claims in the Arctic” drew attention to the fact that the main issue in the field of Russian legal claims in the Arctic is the distribution of natural resources.

In the field of Russia's legal claims in the Arctic, there are a lot of problems that are still waiting to be resolved. However, the speaker expressed the hope that the states, as a result of the negotiations, would be able to reach a compromise solution.

A. Babina made a presentation "The rights of the inhabitants of the Arctic". She noted that fishing is the primary source of livelihood for the inhabitants of the Arctic. In this regard, in order to protect the rights of the inhabitants of the Arctic, joint efforts of states are needed to preserve its living resources.

On June 26, the section of private international law “Modern trends in the development of private international law. The role of international organizations” under the guidance of Professor S. N. Lebedev.

Professor E. V. Kabatova in her report “Modern trends in the development of private international law” considered the most relevant novels in Section VI of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation “Private International Law”.

Doctor of Law N. A. Shebanova made a presentation on new topic"Judicial Protection of Intellectual Property Rights in the Fashion Industry".

At the beginning of her speech, the speaker drew attention to the fact that the legal support of the fashion industry is a new specialization of lawyers dealing with the protection of rights to objects of intellectual activity. Articles, comments, monographs on the protection of the rights of persons employed in the fashion industry that have appeared in the press indicate that a new direction, called "fashion law" - "fashion law", is being formed into an independent legal discipline, characterized by a comprehensive approach to considering legal support functioning of the fashion industry and ways to protect the rights of persons employed in this industry.

The main emphasis in the speech was made on the fact that the specificity of intellectual property objects in the fashion industry dictates the need to resort to various methods of protection. The popularity of a peaceful way of resolving a dispute, and it is used quite often when “fashionable” conflicts arise, is largely due to the timing: the seasonal nature of fashion, its variability dictates the need to find a compromise as soon as possible, otherwise the copyright holder simply loses interest: the object of the dispute goes out of fashion and costs to protect it become economically unprofitable.

The report emphasized that the emerging jurisprudence on the protection of rights to fashion objects indicates certain difficulties in dealing with this category of disputes. This is due to the specifics of the formulation and description of intellectual property objects, the need to distinguish between the utilitarian and aesthetic components of the disputed object.

Russian jurisprudence has not gone unnoticed either. The report analyzes one of the interesting cases considered by the Intellectual Property Rights Court - a dispute between Rospatent and Lacoste on the registration of the designation "L.12.12" as a trademark.

Doctor of Law, Professor G. V. Petrova made a presentation on "International Private Law Regulation of Financial Markets".

The speaker drew attention to the fact that the issue of international private law regulation of financial markets has become increasingly important in connection with Russia's accession to the World Trade Organization.

Candidate of Law, Associate Professor E. V. Vershinina in her report “Conflict-of-law regulation of marriage in Russia and abroad (application of the Hague Conventions on separation and divorce)” noted that recently there has been a change in the conflict-of-law regulation of marriage in Russia.

A. V. Grebelsky made a report "Actual problems of application of the 1970 Hague Convention on the taking of evidence abroad in civil and commercial cases."

The speaker noted that under the 1970 Convention on the Taking of Evidence Abroad in Civil or Commercial Matters, the judicial authorities of some contracting states may directly request the authorized bodies of other states to provide evidence, execute letters of request. However, Russian courts do not fully use the Convention on the Taking of Evidence Abroad.

Professor O. N. Zimenkova made a presentation “Conflict regulation of obligations arising from unfair competition and restriction of competition”.

She noted that by general rule obligations arising from unfair competition are reduced to minimizing damage to one or more competitors in the market.

According to Art. 1222 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, obligations arising from unfair competition are subject to the law of the country whose market is affected or may be affected by such competition.

Teacher A.E. Kolchenkova in her report “The Hague Convention on the Law Applicable to Road Accidents” noted that the number of road accidents involving citizens of other states is increasing in the Russian Federation.

Associate Professor E. I. Kaminskaya made a presentation “Types of damages in contractual and tort (including copyright) relations”. She noted that in 1992, in Russian legislation, in relation to programs of electronic computers, and then to other objects of copyright, such a method of protection as compensation appeared.

Postgraduate student P. E. Ivlieva in her report “Rebuttable and Invalid Arbitration Awards: Peculiarities in Swedish Law” noted that at present international arbitration is a very popular way of resolving disputes.

As a rule, state courts limit themselves to considering only the procedural aspects of arbitration proceedings and verifying that the principles of fairness and legality are observed.

  1. V. Guskov in his speech " Legal mechanisms fight against abuses of interstate agreements on avoidance of double taxation” noted that at present agreements on avoidance of double taxation are largely outdated.

Post-graduate student S. V. Usoskin in his report “Peculiarities of international legal protection of cross-border investments and investments in derivatives” considered topical issues of investment arbitration.

In the past, cross-border investments were defined as property values ​​invested in the territories of foreign countries.

Subsequently, in the context of globalization, new types of investments began to appear. In this regard, most states have concluded many bilateral investment protection agreements that provide a number of investor guarantees, such as receiving compensation in case of expropriation, the right to apply to arbitration, etc.

  1. A. Nikitina in her report "On some questions of inheritance in private international law" considered some aspects of inheritance relations in private international law.

The complexity of inheritance issues lies in the need to unify them. Each state has its own traditions and its own legislation, which prevents its unification at the international level.

Candidate of Legal Sciences, Associate Professor I. A. Orlova made a presentation “Differentiation of Jurisdictions as a Consequence of the Development of Transnational Law”.

She noted that currently in the legal system there are a number of independent systems of national law, international law, European Union law. All these systems of law are self-sufficient, which is confirmed by the established mechanisms for resolving disputes. In this regard, litigation may be resolved under national law, international law or European Union law.

Then the section "Actual Issues of International Law in Regional Economic Integration" was held under the guidance of Doctor of Law, Professor A. A. Moiseev.

Doctor of Law, Professor E. G. Moiseev made a presentation "International legal foundations for the creation and operation of the Eurasian Economic Union."

The speaker noted that the Treaty on the Eurasian Economic Union dated May 29, 2014 sets out the main parameters economic cooperation states.

Doctor of Law, Professor M.S. Bashimov in his report “Problems of Eurasian Integration: Kazakhstan's View” noted that the conclusion of the Treaty on the Eurasian Economic Union was preceded by certain difficulties. Thus, the Republic of Kazakhstan and the Republic of Belarus did not fully agree to share competence and transfer part of their sovereign powers to supranational bodies.

Doctor of Law, Professor L. I. Volova in her report “The Law of Regional Economic Integration” noted that international integration is of great value.

In connection with the signing of the Treaty on the Eurasian Economic Union, there is a need to develop the law of international economic integration as a sub-branch of international economic law.

Candidate of Legal Sciences, Associate Professor N. M. Sidorenko made a presentation “Goals and “acquis” of the European Union in the light of the Lisbon Treaty”.

The speaker noted that the term “acquis” can be defined as a complex, interdisciplinary concept of a universal nature, which is increasingly being used in sociological, historical, and cultural contexts.

There is now an extensive literature on various aspects of the uniform use of the basic acquis elements. However, the notion of a "basic acquis" remains debatable and requires further research.

Candidate of Law, Associate Professor D.S. Boklan in her report “Natural Resources as an Object of International Ecological and International Economic Relations” drew attention to the fact that Natural resources can be included in the structure of the subject of both international economic law and international environmental law.

Candidate of Legal Sciences O. V. Kadysheva made a presentation “Application of the provisions of the World Trade Organization agreements by Russian courts”.

The speaker recalled that the application of the provisions of the World Trade Organization agreements by Russian courts is carried out in accordance with paragraph 4 of Art. 15 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation.

However, the agreements of the World Trade Organization cannot be automatically integrated into the Russian legal system, since their application requires the improvement of national law.

This directly follows from paragraph 4 of Art. 16 of the Marrakesh Agreement establishing the World Trade Organization in 1994 2 , according to which member states are obliged to bring domestic legislation in line with their obligations arising from membership in the World Trade Organization.

Lecturer E. A. Vladimirova made a presentation “Possibilities of using the experience of European integration in building customs union Russia, Kazakhstan, Belarus.

She noted that borrowing the experience of European integration in building the customs union of Russia, Kazakhstan, Belarus can be carried out in the following main areas: conceptual apparatus; direct, immediate and priority action of the rules of law; powers to hold accountable, etc.

E. V. Mashkova in her speech “The procedure for resolving interstate disputes within the framework of the free trade area“ The European Free Trade Association ”(EFTA) considered some topical issues activities of the European Free Trade Association.

Candidate of Law S. V. Glandin in his report “Deoffshorization of the Russian Economy and International Law” noted that 9 out of 10 transactions concluded by large Russian companies are not regulated by Russian law.

In this regard, the deoffshorization of the Russian economy can be defined as a system of government measures aimed at a significant reduction in foreign offshore structures in Russian civil circulation.

Candidate of Law G. A. Korolev in his report “The Role of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development in Formation of the Global Financial Architecture and Development of the Financial Markets of States” drew attention to the fact that the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development was established in 1961. Russia did not join Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, but may nevertheless participate in its work.

Cooperation with the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development can contribute to the application of best practices for the development of Russian financial markets.

Candidate of Law, Associate Professor N. A. Chernyadyeva in the report “The Conventional Model of International Terrorism as a Criminal Act” considered some universal anti-terrorist acts adopted in the United Nations system.

International terrorism is one of the consequences of globalization. There are currently 16 United Nations agreements in the field of combating international terrorism in which more than 170 states participate.

Then the section "Actual problems of the theory and practice of international law" was held under the guidance of Doctor of Law V. S. Kotlyar.

Associate Professor E. I. Maksimenko in her report “The interests of the state and the international community and their relationship in the international legal system” noted that modern international law is a model of a normal human community.

The interests of the international community are as follows: peace, security, general and complete disarmament, preservation of resources for future generations. At the same time, the interests of states are not fully reflected in the norms of international law.

In this regard, there are contradictions between the interests of states and the international community. If these contradictions are not eliminated, then conflicts of various levels may arise. Compliance with the principles and norms of international law will make it possible to resolve many global problems modernity.

Candidate of Law Sciences A. V. Iglin in his report “The Role of Globalization in the Development of International and European Sports Law” drew attention to the fact that in the modern world sports legal relations are becoming global. Currently, globalization has a noticeable impact on legal acts and sporting events in various states.

A. M. Pochuev made a presentation "The impact of globalism on the effectiveness of national judicial systems."

He noted that at present, at the international level, unique systems for assessing the effectiveness of judicial systems, taking into account the economic, legal and cultural specifics, have been formed and are actively used.

Candidate of Legal Sciences, Associate Professor E. A. Karakulyan made a presentation “Lessons from the history of the science of international law in the era of globalization”. He dwelled on the need to modernize international law.

L. A. Eremeishvili made a presentation “A single criterion for the sustainability of biomass and some aspects of the applicable European and international law”.

She noted that biomass is a collective concept that covers a range of materials of plant and animal origin that can replace minerals such as oil, gas and coal.

Doctor of Law, Professor A. G. Bogatyrev made a presentation on topical issues of modern international law.

He noted that there is no crisis of international law. There is a crisis of understanding and especially the application of international law. According to the speaker, national law could be a source of international law.

On June 27, the section "Actual problems of international humanitarian and criminal law" was held under the guidance of Doctor of Law, Professor AI Abdullin.

E.S. Smirnova, Ph.D. in Law, made a presentation “Internal Armed Conflict: Problems of Interaction between Politics and Law”.

She noted that the number of internal armed conflicts is constantly increasing. At the same time, their cruelty increases from year to year. In this regard, it is necessary to improve legal regulation and a unified classification of internal armed conflicts.

Postgraduate student V. S. Khachirova in her speech “Generally recognized norms and principles of international law in the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court” noted that generally recognized norms and principles of international law are reflected in the statutes of international organizations.

One such statute is the Rome Statute, which established the International Criminal Court, the main purpose of which is to end impunity for the perpetrators of the most serious international crimes of concern to the entire international community.

Post-graduate student M. S. Gavrilova in her speech “The International Legal Regime of Occupation: Current Trends in Development” drew attention to the fact that international humanitarian law is beginning to lag behind the practice of applying the occupation regime.

Candidate of Legal Sciences S. A. Knyazkin made a presentation “Problems of unification of decisions of the European Court of Human Rights in criminal and civil proceedings”.

He noted that the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights are applied in the Russian judicial system. Thus, in the Decree of June 27, 2013 No. 21 “On the application by courts of general jurisdiction of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms of November 4, 1950 and its Protocols” 3 Plenum Supreme Court The Russian Federation indicated that the legal positions of the European Court of Human Rights, which are contained in the final judgments adopted in respect of the Russian Federation, are binding on the courts.

Candidate of Legal Sciences, Associate Professor V. R. Avkhadeev made a presentation “International legal regulation of control activities in the field of protecting the rights and freedoms of the indigenous peoples of the Arctic”.

He noted that the need to protect the rights and freedoms of the indigenous peoples of the Arctic is determined by climatic conditions, as well as the industrial development of resources.

Then the section "Actual Problems of International Human Rights Law" was held under the guidance of Doctor of Law, Professor S. V. Bakhin.

PhD in Law, Associate Professor D. E. Lyakhov, in the report “The international legal component of the human right to a society free from corruption”, noted that scientific literature under international law provides for the human right to a society free from corruption.

Corruption is characterized by the following main features: conscious subordination public interests personal interests; secrecy of execution of decisions; existence of mutual obligations; concealment of acts of corruption.

Candidate of Legal Sciences, Associate Professor R. M. Skulakov made a presentation "The role of international law in ensuring the territorial integrity of states and the realization of human rights."

He noted that the principles of territorial integrity and the people's right to self-determination are equal in international law. However, the interests of the state are served by the principle of territorial integrity.

In this regard, it is necessary to more actively use international legal documents in the period of globalization to defend the interests of the Russian Federation in the field of ensuring the territorial integrity of states and the realization of human rights.

PhD in Law Z. G. Aliyev in his report “New Trends in the Field of Human Rights: Business and Human Rights” noted the increasing impact of business on the implementation of human rights and considered some issues of international legal protection of children's rights, women's rights, etc.

Associate Professor B.S. Semenov made a presentation on international legal cooperation between Russia and the countries of the Asia-Pacific region, as well as on the application of international law by Russian courts of general jurisdiction, legal regulation of foreign investment, etc.

Postgraduate student D. R. Gilyazeva in her report “The Right of Indigenous Peoples to a Favorable Environment in International Law” noted that indigenous peoples are directly dependent on the environment. natural environment. At the same time, there is no single definition of the term “indigenous people”. For indigenous peoples, the right to a favorable environment is equivalent to the right to life.

In a specially adopted statement regarding the violation of international humanitarian law in the course of armed clashes on the territory of Ukraine, the Association called on the parties to the conflict to stop armed clashes and ensure respect for human rights.

The Association listened to the report of the Doctor of Law, Professor, President of the Association A. Ya. Kapustin on the work over the past year, which was approved after an active discussion. The report of the Audit Commission was heard and unanimously approved. All participants of the Annual Meeting highly appreciated the scientific and organizational level of this event.