Who made Princess Diana pregnant? Diana was pregnant and could have been saved

Almost twenty years have passed since the death of Diana, Princess of Wales. But conspiracy theorists and devoted fans of the princess still cannot calm down. They put forward many versions of the death of Diana, which are radically different from the official one. Many of them indeed seem more logical than the conclusions of the official police investigation. What do you think?

According to supporters of this theory, Diana of Wales and her lover Dodi Al Ayed staged their death. They understood that as long as they were alive in the eyes of people, they would not be allowed to be together, and decided to disappear in order to start a new one. happy life somewhere on distant sunny islands. Well, at least it's romantic.

Mohammed Al-Fayed, Dodi's father and owner of the famous London department store Harrod's, advocated this version from the very beginning. In his opinion, the royal family is to blame for the death of Diana and Dodi. According to Mohammed, the queen was so shocked by the affair of the ex-wife of the heir to the throne with a Muslim that she ordered British intelligence agents to destroy the scandalous couple. And, I must say, Mohammed Al-Fayed is far from the only supporter of this theory.

For those who do not believe that the old queen is capable of cruelty towards ex-wife son solely for the sake of generic prejudices, a more rigid version of the previous theory was put forward. According to her, Diana was pregnant by Dodi. And the British royal family definitely could not allow the half-brothers and sisters of the heirs to the throne to be Muslims! So the agents had to British intelligence MI6 intervene in the former princess's romance.

Proponents of this theory believe that the Queen has nothing to do with it, and that the British secret services themselves decided to eliminate the "People's Princess". This was stated by former M-16 service agent Richard Tomlinson, who stated that, firstly, he personally monitored Diana at the direction of the leadership, and secondly, that the scenario for the death of Diana and Dodi Al-Fayed exactly coincided with the scenario, which was composed in the bowels of the secret services for the assassination of the President of Serbia in 1992. True, Tomlinson never provided evidence of his words, and most importantly, did not explain why the knights of the cloak and dagger needed to eliminate Diana. But many people believe him.

Indeed, Prince Charles had reason to wish his ex-wife dead. After the divorce of Charles and Diana, the prince turned out to be a traitor and scoundrel in the eyes of the public, who destroyed the marriage with his affair with Camilla Parker-Bowles, and Diana was an innocent sheep who suffered from a dissolute spouse. At the same time, de facto, after parting, everything was exactly the opposite: Diana enjoyed an affair with an eccentric Egyptian who loved her, and Charles himself could not even hope to marry his youthful love - at least until he ex-wife and the mother of his children was in plain sight. It is not surprising that conspiracy theorists blame her ex-husband for the death of Diana - the prince clearly had reasons to remove her from the stage!

Diana's car was knocked off course by a white Fiat

According to the official version, the cause of the accident in the Paris tunnel was the paparazzi car, which allowed a dangerous approach to Diana and Dodi's Mercedes. However, many witnesses claim that the fault lies with the other car. It was a humble little Fiat Uno white color. According to eyewitnesses, he pursued the princess's Mercedes for a long time and drove into the tunnel with it. However, for some reason, they did not begin to investigate the guilt of the driver of the Fiat. Strange, right?

According to Paul Burrell, Diana's former butler, the princess, while still married, sent him a letter that read: "My husband plans to organize an" accident "by breaking the brakes in my car, so that later, explaining that I received a serious head injury, he will marry on Tiggy. Camille is just a decoy, he's using us in the worst possible way." The butler claimed that they had a sincere friendship with the princess, and even published a memoir about her, including a snapshot of the letter. However, most agree that Burrell only forged Diana's handwriting to make the book scandalous. Well, what if it's true?

The princess's Mercedes was damaged

It is known that before the last trip in her life, the princess had to replace the car - "Mercedes", in which she drove all day, by the evening it suddenly turned out to be faulty. Was this failure accidental? And was the replacement car really serviceable, or did agents of the special services manage to conjure over it? Proponents of this theory believe that the car in which Diana was driving had faulty seat belts. It was because of this that Diana, who was always disciplined to buckle up in a car, this time was not buckled up. The only passenger in the Mercedes wearing a seatbelt was the security guard of the princess from the special services. And this leads to strange thoughts.

Another witness, Lord Michon, Diana's lawyer, stated back in October 1995 that the princess feared for her life. According to Lord Michon, the princess feared the same thing as her butler testified: that, at the direction of the Queen and Prince Charles, her car would be put into disrepair, and, most likely, the brakes would be broken. If she doesn't die in the accident, she will still suffer injuries that will result in her being declared incapacitated. However, for some reason, this evidence was not taken into account by the investigators.

Supporters of this theory argue that Diana suffered because she decided to publicize some facts about the royal family. It is claimed that she made a number of audio recordings in which she literally told all the dark secrets of Buckingham Palace - from Charles' affair with a young servant to the details of his relationship with Camilla Parker-Bowles. According to rumors, the murder of Diana was organized by the secret services so that the recordings would not be made public. But Diana still managed to pass them on to her friends - so in the very near future we can learn a lot about the British royal family! If, of course, records exist.

This theory does not have many supporters - the alleged conspiracy turned out to be too unsuccessful. According to her supporters, the culprit of the accident was the driver of Diana, Henri Paul, who was bribed by the British intelligence services to end the princess. Here's just one problem - Henri Paul died with the princess. Hardly reasonable person take that risk for any amount of money!

The culprit is a mysterious stranger

Many witnesses to the fatal accident confirmed that a crowd of people with cameras immediately ran to the wrecked car. And only one witness, Sarah Culpepper, stated that she saw how, immediately after the accident, a man in his forties in a dark suit slowly left the scene of the tragedy. He spoke calmly on the phone and did not seem at all shocked by the incident. Now conspiracy theorists believe that the man was the customer of the murder. Was he connected to the secret services? Or with Prince Charles? It is unknown, as they could not find it.

Several witnesses reported that seconds before the accident, a bright flash of light illuminated the tunnel through which Diana's Mercedes was passing. According to Richard Tomlinson, this is a traditional intelligence trick to blind the driver. But, surprisingly, it is not possible to confirm this fact: none of the 17 cameras located along the Mercedes route, including in the tunnel, worked on the day of the tragedy! Suspicious, isn't it?

The driver of the Mercedes was poisoned by special services

According to a medical examination, in the blood of the deceased driver Henri Paul, an alcohol level was recorded that was three times higher than the permitted norms. This is very strange, given that Paul was a disciplined driver, and Diana and Dodi would hardly have gotten into a car driven by a drunk. These facts led conspiracy theorists to claim that Henri Paul was poisoned by the special services, adding something to his food or drink, in the hope that the drunk driver would definitely not be able to cope with the controls.

James Andanson was one of the paparazzi who followed Princess Diana on the day of her death. It is believed that Andanson was the driver of the same white Fiat that collided with the princess's Mercedes. True, he himself denied it with all his might. However, neither he nor his family could provide any credible information about where he was on the evening of the tragedy. But it is known for sure that six hours after the disaster, he was already sitting on a plane flying to Corsica. After some time, Andanson returned to France ... and soon his burnt body was found in a car in the French outback. The most striking thing is that the police officers who discovered the charred corpse very quickly issued a verdict of "suicide". So was Andanson stalking Princess Diana? And did he work for the secret services, as conspiracy theorists claim? Now there are no answers to these questions.

The father of Diana's unborn child was her friend, the son of the Egyptian billionaire Dodi al-Fayed. His father, Mohammed al-Fayed, had previously put forward a version of the princess's pregnancy, but his words were not taken into account.

Mohammed al-Fayed continues to insist that his son and his girlfriend were the victims of an assassination attempt that was disguised as an ordinary car accident. However, the source Independent on Sunday, who announced Diana's pregnancy, called this version untenable.

The representative of Mohammed al-Fayed, Richard Keane, argues that there are several circumstances in the death of Diana and Dodi, which cast doubt on the official version of what happened. As if there is evidence that for several months before the accident, Diana and her friend were being monitored by British and American intelligence agencies. In addition, the accident in Paris brings to mind the scenario of the assassination attempt on former president Yugoslavia Slobodan Milosevic, which was prepared by the British intelligence services. The third factor that raises questions is that at the time of the accident, for some reason, not a single road surveillance camera was working in the tunnel. Richard Keene believes that Henry Paul - the driver of Diana's Mercedes - could be an informant for MI6.

According to some doctors, the doctors had a chance to save Diana. The world-famous South African cardiac surgeon Christian Barnard writes in his book that, having read the autopsy materials, he came to the conclusion that Diana died of internal bleeding. And if she had not been treated on the spot, but taken to the clinic within 10 minutes, then the lethal outcome could have been avoided. Another doctor, Frederic Melle, who witnessed the accident, claims that Diana was in even better condition than her bodyguard Trevor Reese-Jones, who managed to survive after a car accident.

A special hearing on Diana's death will be held on January 6 at the Queen Elizabeth II Convention Center in London. Similar hearings regarding the death of Dodi al-Fayed will be held on the same day in Reigate (Surrey). The forensic expert said royal family UK Michael Burgess.

British journalist Sue Reid spent 10 years studying the facts of the death of Princess Diana in a car accident in Paris and found new circumstances proving that Princess Diana and Dodi al Faed were killed by agents of the British intelligence service SAS.

Last famous photograph, Princess Diana, taken on the night of her death. The princess with her friend Dodi al Fayed in the back of a Mercedes before leaving the Ritz Hotel in Paris for her nest near the Champs Elysées. Diana tries to see through the rear window of the Mercedes if they are being followed by the paparazzi who have besieged her and Dodi since their arrival in the French capital. At the wheel of the car Henri Paul, the driver of Dodi al Faed, in the passenger seat in front of the bodyguard Trevor Rees-Jones.

What happened over the next two minutes takes central location in a new investigation by Scotland Yard, under suspicion of the murder of Princess Diana and her companions in the Pont d'Alma tunnel in Paris, members of the SAS, a secret British intelligence service, fell under suspicion. SAS is a division of the powerful secret service MI5. Many see this event as another thread of conspiracy.

Hundreds of articles have been written about Diana's death at 00:20 in the morning, August 31, 1997, in a car accident in Paris. Both investigations, Scotland Yard and the French police concluded that the death of Princess Diana was the result of a tragic accident.

However, British journalist Sue Ride claims: “The world was led to believe that the driver of the Mercedes, who was drunk, and also those who were chasing them, were to blame for Diana’s death. paparazzi car, but I contend that this is not true. Since the death of Princess Diana at the age of 36, I have carefully examined all the circumstances of this tragedy and now I want to make my findings public.

I spoke to eyewitnesses, French and British intelligence officers, SAS personnel, friends of Diana and Dodi al Waed. I interviewed the parents of driver Henri Paul, who was driving on that tragic day. They, with tears in their eyes, claimed that their son had never been an alcoholic. All he could afford was a bottle of beer or a liquorice-flavored glass of Ricard.

The facts I have discovered prove that Princess Diana's death was no accident. It is very important that I was able to prove that the paparazzi who allegedly pursued Diana's Mercedes were not even in the tunnel at the time of the car accident.

One of the eyewitnesses said that a powerful black motorcycle, which did not belong to any of the paparazzi, overtook Diana's Mercedes in the tunnel. The motorcycle rider and the passenger in the back seat caused this terrible accident.

In addition, the journalist discovered the involvement of an undercover SAS unit subordinate to MI6 in the crash, and also identified the names of two MI6 officers who were involved in the circumstances of this case.

Of course, it was very convenient for some VIPs in the UK to scapegoat driver Henri Paul and the paparazzi and thus hide the truth about that disaster from the public.

Was Princess Diana pregnant?

Diana, who recently divorced Prince Charles, was a thorn in the side of the royal family. Her affair with the Muslim Dodi, which, although it lasted only six weeks, had every reason to develop into a marriage.

The princess made an important symbolic gesture, she gave her lover the “most precious thing” - a pair of cufflinks of her late father, and also called her friends and said that she had prepared a big surprise for them upon her return from Paris.

Dodi, in turn, ordered for Diana inlaid precious stones jewelry from one of the best jewelers in Paris, which was engraved with the words "tell me yes".

Diana's friends say the princess was pregnant. You can even see it in photos of her in a leopard print swimsuit, while relaxing on a yacht, fourteen days earlier.

Already after the death of Diana, it became known that she, in the strictest confidence, visited one of the best London hospitals to scan the pregnancy. Just before these leopard print swimsuit photos surfaced.

To annoy former relatives, Diana threatened to go abroad with her Muslim friend and take her children, Princes William and Harry, with her.

To this end, Dodi bought an estate in California, on the beach of Malibu, which previously belonged to movie star Julia Andrews. Dodi showed his purchase to the princess on video and, as one of Diana's friends said, then he promised her that in California they would hold best years married life.

Exiled from the royal court and stripped of all titles, Diana was thrilled at the prospect.

Mohammed al-Fayed, billionaire owner of Harrods and father of Diana's future husband, claims that Diana was pregnant by his son and was preparing to talk about her upcoming marriage to her children, Princes Harry and William, upon her return to the UK.

She planned to do this before the children went to boarding school on September 1, but she did not live only one day before that date.

Could the prospect of having a colored child in an Oryol family lead to Diana's murder? If yes, who did it and how?

Princess Diana. Mission accomplished.

These questions were partly answered by the testimony of 14 eyewitnesses to the accident that night. It is said that Diana's car was surrounded at the entrance to the Alma tunnel by several cars and motorcycles, which immediately disappeared after the accident.

There was a general belief that these were paparazzi cars and motorcycles. This version, already on Monday morning the next day after the accident, was stubbornly promoted by the media.

Even at the entrance to the tunnel where the accident happened, there was an inscription in large letters “Paparazzi killer.” Someone sprayed it with gold paint on the wall. To this day, no one knows who did it and why this inscription was not erased by the French police.

Now it has become known that the paparazzi chasing Diana's car drove into the tunnel at least a minute later than the accident happened. It is clear that they are not involved in this tragedy and are not guilty.

Indeed, two years later, they were cleared of charges of involvement in the death of Princess Diana, after the French public prosecutor said at a hearing that the investigation did not have enough evidence for this.

In fact, the paparazzi got behind Diana's car. Diana's driver managed to trick them back in the courtyard of the Ritz Hotel. He came up with a trick with two identical Mercedes, and while the photographers figured out what was happening, Diana and her friend quietly left.

However, eyewitnesses claim that Diana's Mercedes at the entrance to the tunnel was followed not only by a black motorcycle, but also by two Fiat Uno Turbo cars.

There is no evidence to link these cars or motorcycles to the paparazzi. One of these cars propped up behind Diana's Mercedes, provoking the driver to accelerate and drive erratically. As the cars burst into the tunnel, the second Fiat Uno Turbo accelerated and began to undercut the princess's Mercedes, pushing it towards the dividing wall.

This maneuver allowed a black motorcycle with a driver and a passenger in helmets to abruptly bypass Diana's car. Witnesses state that when the motorcycle was only a few meters from the front of the Mercedes (4.5 meters), there was a very bright flash of light from the passenger of the motorcycle towards the driver of the Mercedes. There is speculation that it was a laser beam that blinded the driver of the Mercedes.

Then there was a loud bang, the limousine swerved sharply and crashed into the 13th pillar in the tunnel. After that, Diana's Mercedes turned into a pile of twisted metal.

One of the eyewitnesses of the accident, a French ship mechanic, drove ahead of Diana's car and watched what was happening in the rear-view mirror. He saw a black motorcycle stop after the accident and one of the motorcyclists jumped off the motorcycle and looked into the window of the Mercedes. Then the motorcyclist made a gesture with his hands to someone, which is informally used in a military environment (both arms crossed at chest level move down in different directions, which means “mission accomplished”).

After that, both motorcyclists raced away forever from the tunnel and have not yet been found. This witness, with whom his wife was in the car, unequivocally described the incident as a "terrorist attack."

Was it part of a conspiracy to get rid of Diana and her lover and was it the work of the British intelligence services, MI6 and its SAS unit, while there are no hard facts of their participation in the death of Princess Diana.

Sue Reid, thanks to whom the world learned about the new circumstances of this tragedy, received entries in his blog after the death of Diana from one of the former MI6 employees.

He wrote to the journalist: “I hope you are brave enough to dig deeper and learn more about MI6 and about X and Y (the journalist does not reveal the names of agents, for obvious reasons, calling them X and Y). Both of them took part in the assassination of the princess, which was approved at the highest level.”

Later, the names of these killers became known from other sources in the intelligence services. It is alleged that there are two men who exercised overall control over the “operation in Paris”.

The two launched a version that the accident was organized to scare Diana and end her affair with Dodi, as the Muslim was considered an unsuitable partner by former members of her family. “We were hoping to break her arm or cause minor injuries,” one of these agents said. The operation was under the control of MI6 officers, but everything went wrong that night, no one in MI6 wanted to kill Diana.”

Princess Diana, what do agents of the Russian Foreign Intelligence Service know about her?

The names of these two agents were mentioned in Moscow.

A veteran of the Russian Foreign Intelligence Service, Gennady Sokolov, wrote in his book that MI6, X and Y were there the night Diana died in Paris and that the Russian Foreign Intelligence Service intended to find out why. The author also stated that the SVR agents were familiar with these British agents.

Both of them are senior officers of MI6 and were with secret mission in Paris that night without the knowledge of French counterintelligence. After Diana's death, they immediately left Paris.

Princess Diana and her possible marriage to Dodi, greatly worried the British royal family. The princess's phone was constantly tapped and she herself was constantly under surveillance. After the crash, public opinion deliberately misled. Created scapegoats, paparazzi and a drunk driver. The press wrote that Henri Paul was an alcoholic, a virtual kamikaze who helped destroy them all. This is complete nonsense.

It was clear from the start that this was not an accident. It was a purely English murder, the SVR and other special services of Russia are sure. According to their SAS, one of the units of MI6 is directly involved in the murder. These guys work at the highest level, leaving no trace.

The driver Henri Paul and Dodi al-Fayed died instantly, the only survivor, bodyguard Trevor Rees-Jones. However, he has many injuries to his face, chest, rupture of the pulmonary artery. They say that his memory of the events in the tunnel was "lost". Well, Diana herself died four hours later from blood loss in a hospital in Paris.

The official investigation was not too eager to establish the truth. More than 170 important witnesses, including the doctor who embalmed Diana's body (during this process, the pregnancy was disguised in post-mortem blood tests), were never interviewed by the investigation.

Another doctor at the hospital where Diana was taken said she saw a small fetus, possibly six to ten weeks old, in the princess's womb during an ultrasound scan. This witness was also not questioned by the investigation.

The judge, Lord Scott Baker, who is in charge of the investigation, allowed her to put her testimony in writing, which, as it turned out later, does not contain any other valuable information besides her current address in America.

The authorities were particularly unfair to the driver Henri Paul, who from the very beginning was declared a chronic alcoholic.

The day after the crash, French authorities said he was an alcoholic and “drunk like a pig” when he left the Ritz the night of the crash. Later it became known that at the time this statement was made, tests for the presence of alcohol in the driver's blood were not yet ready.

In addition, the driver had undergone an intensive medical examination three days before the crash, and his liver showed no signs of alcohol abuse.

Every year, on the anniversary of Diana's death, the British bring fresh bouquets of flowers to the gilded gates of Kensington Palace. Maybe with each passing year there will be less and less flowers in memory of Princess Diana, but not questions about the circumstances of this tragedy.

Scott McLeod, the Paris-based Middle East correspondent for American Time magazine, was returning on the night of August 30 with his family from vacation. In the Alma Tunnel he was blinded by police flashing lights. I thought dejectedly: "Accident ... Another one ..."

At home, McLeod turned on the TV and realized: no, not another accident. This accident will go down in history. Princess Diana crashed...

No more journalists have ever been born faster than Americans. Scott McLeod and his friend Thomas Sankton, chief of the Paris bureau of the Times, spent 5 months investigating the tragedy.

The result was the book Death of a Princess: An Investigation. Actually, not a book, but pure dynamite. A sort of anatomy of the death of Diana, where every page is a fresh look at things, if not a sensation. The book itself, however, is not yet on the shelves. But the London "Times" began, as is customary here, to pull out tastier pieces from there and throw them into the mouths of readers: maybe they will peck at the whole volume of 120 thousand words.

Of course they bite. For the British, the transformation of a princess from a living great martyr into a dead icon is an unhealed wound. Just the other day, Britain was jostling in lines for postage stamps with a picture of Diana. Just recently, tens of thousands of phone calls jammed all the lines that accept requests for excursions to her family estate. There, on an island in the middle of a lake, now surrounded by a two-meter dark blue steel bar fence, " people's princess found what seemed to be eternal rest.

But here is this book! And it claims something amazing: even after the Mercedes kissed the 13th concrete pillar in the Alma tunnel, Diana could be saved! If only doctors were more competent. If these Frenchies weren't fixated on their national philosophy of emergency medical care, the essence of which is to treat to the fullest right at the scene of an accident. That is, if they immediately sent her to the hospital.

As you know, the official cause of Diana's death was internal bleeding as a result of extensive chest trauma and rupture of the vein of the left lung. An investigation by McLeod and Sankton uncovered an incredible waste of precious time. It turned out that the princess was taken to the operating room only after ... 1 hour 45 minutes (!) After the accident, and she was still alive there for at least 15 minutes. Total 2 hours of flickering, but still life. Mountains could be moved.

According to the leading medical authorities interviewed by the authors of the book, this means that the rupture of the vein was either minor, or the damage was blocked by a thrombus or rib fragment. In any case, Diana could have been saved if she had undergone emergency surgery. The lengthy attempts by French doctors to stabilize the condition of the princess in the Alma tunnel, instead of immediately transporting her to a hospital, were a gross mistake.

“Diana didn’t bleed because there were blood clots at the rupture site,” Professor John Auchener, a luminary of American cardiovascular surgery and owner of a famous clinic in New Orleans, told the authors. “Or maybe because the pressure there was negligible. But in general, it's a pretty simple rule: if you can get these patients to the hospital and connect them to the heart-lung machine fast enough, they can be saved. they would save her..."

But French doctors all this time they spent mainly on external massage of the chest. It is impossible to understand this with the head, Professor Ochener believes. "When you start to beat on the chest, the pressure in all the ventricles of the heart jumps simultaneously. It was hard to think of anything worse for her ..." Another American authority in surgery, Dr David Wasserman, he generally told the authors of the book: if this happened in the United States, doctors would not be able to avoid a lawsuit. But, in my opinion, something else happened: in the book "Death of a Princess", the entire healthcare system of France was put on trial.

And not only because of their incompetence, but also depressing secrecy. The authors of the book bang their heads against this blank wall of mystery when they try to answer the most important, from their point of view, question: was Princess Diana pregnant at the time of her death? A lot depends on this. If she really was pregnant by the Egyptian Dodi al-Fayed, then over the British monarchy, over Britain's relations with the entire Arab world, over 1.5 million Muslims living in the British Isles, looms the ghost of a brother or sister of the heir to the throne, who were Anglo-Saxons would be only 50 percent. A half-breed at Buckingham Palace? It's too much...

All "for" seem to be indirect. The rumors began with a famous photograph taken by a television set on the island of St. Tropez, where Diana's noticeable tummy is visible. But pregnancy is noticeable only at 3-4 months. However, the princess and Dodi met in mid-July, so the fetus could not be more than 6 weeks old. The tummy of a 36-year-old woman is not such a piece of evidence.

McLeod and Sankton found something else: the doctors of France and the French police must have irrefutable evidence that one of the most famous women in the world was pregnant. Diana repeatedly did blood tests. They were required to include the so-called Wei-NOS - a pregnancy test. She also had an ultrasound sonogram.

Where are these tests? McLeod and Sankton conducted dozens of interviews on this topic, including with doctors at the hospital where the dying princess was taken. Sensational discovery McLeod and Sankton is that the results of the tests WAS REMOVED FROM DIANA'S CASE HISTORY. They are not there. But they are in the safes of the French Ministry of Health and Police, the authors are convinced. And the content of these documents is extremely explosive. Otherwise, Dr. Dominique Leconte, the pathologist of the hospital, would not have been banned from the usual procedure in such cases - an autopsy of the princess's body and taking a blood test before issuing the coffin to the British. Who banned? "Instructions have been received," Leconte replied.

From all this, the authors of the book "Death of a Princess" draw a firm conclusion: today it is not known whether Diana was pregnant. But exhaustive documentary evidence of this exists. And until they come out into the light, "yes" outweighs "no" on the scales.

McLeod and Sankton also took a closer look at other characters in the tragedy. Say, to Henri Paul, deputy director of the security service of the Ritz Hotel in Paris, who was driving during that black hour. And they also stumbled upon some highly suspicious riddles.

It turned out, for example, that not only traces of alcohol and "recreational" drugs were found in Paul's blood. There he showed up and unusually high level... carbon monoxide, that is, carbon monoxide. This usually happens when engine exhaust seeps into the passenger cabin.

I have strong suspicions about sabotage. Someone could have been tricky with the car, Sankton said in an interview with which the London Times precedes the publication of excerpts from The Death of a Princess.

The newspaper is now snapped up every morning, like we have hot whites in winter. But on the subject of Princess Diana in Britain now you can’t sit a monopoly for a long time. The Daily Mirror is already on the tail of The Times.

She found another Diana - 36-year-old Diana Holliday, who allegedly has a child from the same Dodi al-Fayed, the princess's beloved. Dodi allegedly demanded an abortion, and she, a noble, humane woman, gave birth. Dodi didn't know that. Diana No. 2 called him and said: "And I gave birth!" And this dramatic conversation took place exactly on the eve of a car accident. Do you understand?

The Daily Mirror also reports that millionaire Mohammed al-Fayed, Dodi's father, rashly gave his granddaughter's mother £5,000 ($8,000). And then he changed his mind and sued her for extortion.

Apparently, the release of the book "Diana-2": I was also pregnant by Dodi" should be expected somewhere in the very near future.

Princess of Gaul to become soap opera heroine

Just a few months after their tragic death, Diana and Dodi al-Fayed will be resurrected on television in a controversial British series. Thus, for the first time, the ban on the commercial use of the princess's name will be violated.

Despite threats of legal action from the princess's family, the producers from London said they were ready to start filming and start airing the television series by mid-April.

Both actors, Amy Sekcombe and George Jackson, still unknown to anyone, were chosen solely on the principle of external resemblance to the tragic couple. The series will reflect the last years of Diana's life - from the moment of her divorce from Prince Charles to meeting with the son of the richest owner of Harrods stores and tragic death in Paris. "The film will tell about her search for personal happiness," - explained the representatives of the film crew.

The project provoked the fury of the Diana Foundation, created to support charitable actions and dispose of her image. "No one even asked our permission ... The production of such a film literally immediately after the death of the princess and Dodi al-Fayed is absolutely unacceptable and shameless," the Foundation's lawyer protested.

(According to the materials of the Russian and foreign press).

New shocking details of his personal life and Prince Charles are sorted out on the net for quotes. Of course, even now, knowing the history of the relationship of the couple, one can judge the reasons for the disagreement, but still it becomes uncomfortable from what a deeply unhappy woman the idol of millions, Princess Diana, was.

Grade

Recall that famous writer Andrew Morton published the confessions of the ex-wife of the heir to the British throne, which she asked not to be published during her lifetime. Now, audio recordings of fears and hopes, feelings of unrequited love for Prince Charles, are attracting increased attention.

It has been 20 years since the book about Princess Diana was published, but only now archival audio recordings have been made public. Previously, the world learned that, but also called their marriage. Now it became known that Prince Charles totally ignored his wife, because of which she went to shocking measures: she cut herself with a penknife or threw herself down the stairs to attract the attention of an indifferent husband.

When I was four months pregnant, I threw myself down the stairs, trying to get my husband's attention to listen to me.

But Prince Charles paid no attention to all this. I had to go through hardships myself. In solitude, she comprehended new duties at the royal court. Due to the indifference, betrayal and nitpicking of her husband, Diana had bulimia, due to which she could lose weight dramatically.

We walked for four hours, we didn't have food, and apparently I didn't eat for several days. When I say this, I mean that the food would remain in the stomach. During the walk, I felt terrible, but I was afraid to talk about it. At some point, I put my hand on my husband's shoulder and said: "Honey, I think I'm about to fall" - and slid down him. Then the royal assistants took me to the room ... Charles continued to work on the exhibition. He left me alone, I went back to the hotel and cried my eyes out.

But this problem of the mother royal heirs did not find a response in the heart of Prince Charles, and constant worries about a rival only exacerbated the situation.