French tanks in World War II. French tanks The smallest tank in France

The second country to use tanks on the battlefield was France. Stuck in static, they understood the superiority of defensive means over attackers. To change the balance, it was necessary to use a radically new weapon of attack.

The first combat French tank was ready in September 1916, thanks to the activity of J. Etienne, who is considered to be the founder of French tank building. As chief of staff of an artillery regiment, he, like other astute commanders, saw the main possibilities for changing the situation at the front. His idea was to break through the first line of defense with caterpillar vehicles, and, already being directly on the first line, to suppress subsequent ones that were not accessible to artillery fire. field artillery. That is, to put artillery on carts storming the defense. Looking ahead, it must be said that the armored fighting vehicles that we called "tanks" were referred to by the French as "assault artillery tractors."

The generals of France, like the military leaders of other countries, were very skeptical about the idea of ​​building a tank, but thanks to the perseverance of J. Etienne and the support of the commander-in-chief, General J. Joffre, they managed to get permission to build a prototype.
The leader of mechanical engineering of those years was the Renault company, headed by its founder L. Renault, so it is quite obvious that J. Etienne offered him the first to build a tank. He, in turn, refused, motivating the answer by the lack of experience with a caterpillar mover. Then Etienne turned to the designer E. Brillet, the head of the Schneider company, the largest arms manufacturer, especially since he already had some similar experience, some time before that he had booked the Holt tractor. In January 1916, with the assistance of J. Joffre, the company received an order to create 400 machines. Later, these machines will become known as "Schneider" or CA1.

For some unknown reason, the head of the army motorization department, separately from the commander in chief, placed an order for the construction of 400 tanks at the FAMN company in the city of Saint-Chamond, under whose name the tanks would go into series.

The specific concept of the tank was not formulated, so France received two different models of tanks placed on the basis of the Holt caterpillar tractor. Unlike English tanks the tracks did not cover the perimeter of the hull, they were located on the sides and under it, and the undercarriage was sprung, which greatly simplified the control of the tanks and increased the comfort of the crew. But due to the overhang of the front of the tank hull over the tracks, any vertical barrier became insurmountable.
After the first successes, Etienne again turned to Louis Renault, this time he did not refuse, especially since Etienne was able to more specifically formulate the task - a light infantry escort tank on the battlefield, with a less noticeable silhouette and less vulnerability. The result is one of the most iconic tanks in the world, the Renault FT.

Development of tank building

Until the end of World War I, FCM developed heavy tanks 1A, 1B, but things did not go beyond the development of prototypes.

After the war, France had the most a large number of battle tanks. On this basis, General Etienne tried to organize independent tank troops, divided into light, heavy, and medium tanks.
The generals thought differently, and since 1920 all tank units were subordinated to the infantry. There was a division into infantry and cavalry.

But Etienne's activity was not in vain, until 1923 the FCM company produced 10 heavy multi-turreted 2C tanks, and the FAMH company produced a whole series of light tanks of the 1921, 1924, 1926 and 1928 models, under the designation M21, M24, M26 and M28. On the models of this series, the French were the first in the world to use the possibility of dual cross-country ability: caterpillar engine + wheels. The type of propeller changed depending on the circumstances. The most original solution was used on the M24 and M26.

Regretting to write off the Renault FT created with such difficulty, they were constantly modernized. After another modification in 1927, the tank is already called NS1, and NS3 becomes the prototype of the D1, in 1936 the D1 "grows" into the medium D2.

France did not bypass the craze of the 30s with wedges. From 1931 to 1940, the French produced 6200 Renault UE light tracked vehicles, outwardly resembling the English Vickers-Carden-Loyd Mk VI tankettes. The troops called them "infantry tractors."

After the adoption by France in 1931 of the army motorization program, special attention is paid only to the development of wheeled and reconnaissance vehicles. Under this program, Renault presents the AMR light tank. Not having much support from the higher ranks. Renault and FCM begin joint production of the B1 heavy tank, which is not an ordinary tank in all respects.

Due to a lack of understanding of the capabilities of tanks and the other roles assigned to them in support of infantry, in the 17 post-war years, France built only 170 new tanks. tank troops the country did not have in 1936, at that time it was in the army, except for the obsolete FT - 17 B1, 17 D2 and 160 D1. After the well-known events in Spain and Ethiopia, the command, realizing the approaching threat and the complete non-compliance of their own army with the new maneuver war, adopts a 4-year army building plan. During the period 1936-1940, 3 light mechanized, 2 tank divisions and 50 separate tank battalions equipped with new development tanks should have been organized.

Mass serial production of light tanks H35 and R35, just created by Hotchkiss and Renault, begins. (the number in the name of French tanks often indicates the year of creation).
H35 was considered cavalry. The FCM company presented an interesting FCM36 model, but before the start of the war, only 100 pieces were produced due to the high cost.

In 1936, the SOMUA S-35 became the main medium tank, which was originally created for operations as part of cavalry units. Due to the absence of other similar tanks, he is credited with the role of a tank capable of independently solving tactical tasks.

At the time of the German invasion, 2700 light tanks were in the service of France, a little more than 300 medium, 172 heavy, the old 1600 Renault FT and 6 pieces of 2C. Although the number of combat vehicles increased, the lack of understanding of the doctrine of the use of tanks on the battlefield and the poor training and staffing of the crews did not bring any serious results, all the tanks were knocked out or passed into the hands of the Germans.

Modern French tanks

After the war, tank building, like other industrial sectors, was in a completely destroyed state. The army was armed with American or captured tanks. The first post-war tank ARL-44 was released in 1945, in fact, it was the embodiment of pre-war ideas, but it was not assigned a “competitive” task, with the release of 50 units. the industry was resurrected.

In accordance with the adopted in 1946. tank building program, full-fledged serial production began in 1951. light tank AMX-13, its distinguishing feature is a oscillating turret.

Trying to catch up with the USSR, in 1951, a heavy tank AMX-50 was produced in a small series, in appearance very reminiscent of ISs. The next model of the AMX-65 heavy tank was a combination of the "pike nose" of the IS and a copy of the Royal Tiger.

The niche of medium tanks was occupied by the AMX-63 entering the troops since 1965.

In the same year, the main battle tank AMX-30 began to enter service, which eventually became the basis of the armored forces. Its further development was the AMX-40 model introduced in 1983. Models AMX-32 and AMX-40 were developed exclusively for export.

In the late 70s, German and French specialists teamed up to jointly create the Napoleon-1 and KPz-3 tanks; in 1982, joint work was stopped. But the French continued to develop common developments, as a result of which, in 1991, the main battle tank of the third generation AMX-48 Leclerc began to enter service with the army.

Serial tanks of France

By the beginning of World War II, France came up with a highly controversial set of tanks. While in most tank-building powers by that time they had taken up the development and production of medium tanks, in the French army the situation with medium-class vehicles was almost catastrophic. Orientation of production to the production of light tanksRenault R35 and "combat" (actually heavy) tanksChar B1 bis led to the fact that the French infantry had only fifty medium tanks.

Against this background, it is still quite unexpected that France nevertheless built medium tanks in large quantities, however, for the cavalry, and officially they were called armored vehicles. This is aboutSOMUA S35, a cavalry tank, which, in terms of combat characteristics, was the best French tank of the pre-war period.

Thick-skinned cavalryman

Enough strong positions cavalry in the French army led to the fact that by the beginning of the 30s there was a situation very similar to what was happening at that time in the USA and Japan. Officially, the cavalry did not have its own tanks in all these countries, because such vehicles were traditionally intended to support infantry units. But in fact, a new type of tank appeared, in different countries referred to either as a "combat vehicle" or as an "armored car". In fact, these were real tanks, sometimes even of the middle class, but, as a rule, they were light tanks with a crew of 2-4 people and the main armament in the form of machine guns. The main requirement for such combat vehicles was high mobility.

At first, French cavalry tanks developed in the same direction. The armored firstborn of the French cavalry was the AMR 33 (Automitrailleuse de reconnaissance, “reconnaissance armored car”), later the more advanced AMR 35 appeared. These two-man vehicles with machine guns were quite consistent with the classic idea of ​​\u200b\u200bcavalry tanks. In parallel with the AMR program, launched in 1931, a program was launched to create a more powerful "armored car" - AMC (Automitrailleuse de combat, armored combat vehicle). Here, the semi-tracked Schneider P16 armored car, which had more serious armament in the form of a 37-mm SA 18 cannon and a machine gun coaxial with it, became the first-born.

But since 1933 the situation began to change. Last but not least, this was due to the activity of Hotchkiss, which proposed the concept light tank, in the design of which casting was massively used. On August 2, a specification was developed for a new combat vehicle, to which 14 firms responded. Firm Hotchkiss, however, rather quickly refused to participate in the competition. It is possible that in Saint-Denis they sensibly assessed their chances of winning and began to look for an alternative customer, who was found in the person of the cavalry command. As a result, a very similar to the Renault R 35, but almost one and a half times faster tank, designated Hotchkiss H 35, was in service with the French cavalry. Moreover, here he managed to “eat” the AMR 35, taking, among other things, his niche.

The Schneider-Creusot concern also participated in the same competition for the development of a light tank. Unfortunately, there is no data on this car, it is only known that it was designed as a two-seater. The development was carried out by the subsidiary company Société d "outillage mécanique et d" usinage d "artillerie (SOMUA). It is worth noting that even starting from the Schneider CA1, the first serial French tank, it was SOMUA that dealt with the armored orders of the concern. This also applied to the development of the Char B theme , and cavalry combat vehicles.

Even before the competition for a light 6-ton tank began, the Saint-Ouen firm was developing the SOMUA AC 1 half-track armored car as part of the AMC theme. Unlike the Schneider P16, this three-seat vehicle had a more tank-like layout. Later, a heavier SOMUA AC 2 armored car began to be designed. At the same time, the cavalry command understood more and more clearly that instead of an armored car, it needed a tank.

A characteristic detail of the layout is a large muffler. A less bulky design was made in metal

In the early spring of 1934, a meeting was held between SOMUA and the cavalry command. In its course, the concept of a new tank was born, the design of which combined the technical solutions of a light vehicle created for the 1933 competition and (in part) the requirements for AMC armored vehicles. The combat weight of the three-seat vehicle was estimated at 13 tons, while it had to reach speeds of at least 30 km / h, have 30 mm thick armor and a cruising range of 200 kilometers.

In May, the thickness of the armor was increased to 40 mm, which should have been enough for confident protection against a 25 mm anti-tank gun. As weapons, it was supposed to use a 47-mm cannon and a machine gun coaxial with it. In general, it turned out not an armored car, but a real one medium tank, similar to the Renault D2, but with a higher speed. The program was finally approved on June 26, 1934 by the commander of the French cavalry, General Flavigny.

190-horsepower engine, which was developed with the participation of Janvier, Sabin et Cie

The development of the machine, which received the designation SOMUA AC 3, was a real challenge for the company from St. Ouen. There were a number of serious issues that needed to be quickly resolved. This was especially true of the power plant. SOMUA produced trucks, but their engines were ill-suited to the new tank. A more powerful power plant was required, and quite urgently. SOMUA approached Janvier, Sabin et Cie, a motor design firm. In pretty short term there they developed an 8-cylinder V-shaped power plant. A set of drawings was purchased, on the basis of which SOMUA built its own motor, which in design partly echoes the Hispano-Suiza 8B aircraft engine. With a volume of 12.7 liters, it developed a power of 190 horsepower.

The design of the AC 3 suspension turned out to be similar to the one designed for their tanks by Škoda

No less acute was the issue with the chassis. There was nothing suitable in the range of SOMUA vehicles, so the chassis had to be developed from scratch. It was here that the "Czechoslovak" trail, beloved by many historians, surfaced. Indeed, there was a partnership between Schneider-Creusot and Škoda, and it was they who allowed SOMUA to make things easier for themselves. True, for some reason, Škoda Š-II-a, aka LT vz.35, is usually indicated as the basis for copying the chassis and especially the suspension. An extremely dubious statement, because the development of this Czechoslovak tank began around the same time as the AC 3. For some reason, researchers forget the fact that Škoda used a similar suspension earlier - on the light tank Š-II, aka Škoda SU. The SOMUA suspension developed on this base was somewhat different in design. However, her Czechoslovak origin is beyond doubt.

Automitrailleuse de combat AC 3 on trials, spring 1935. Ballast installed instead of tower

The draft design of the AC 3, as well as its 1:10 scale wooden model, were prepared by SOMUA by October 1934. Renault also did not sit idly by: not wanting to lose the opportunity to get an impressive contract for the production of six hundred AMC, the factory design bureau quickly developed a project designated as the AMC 40 mm. There is no detailed information on this development, but, most likely, it was about the development of the Renault YR cavalry tank, aka AMC 34. In any case, the cavalry rejected this project, without even starting to spend money on manufacturing a prototype. But for the AC 3, the situation turned out quite differently: on October 12, 1934, an order was received for the manufacture of a prototype machine.

You can clearly see how the AC 3 differs from the front of the serial tank

Construction work on the SOMUA AC 3 began in November 1934, and on April 11, 1935, the vehicle with registration number 745-W1 was ready. Taking into account the fact that we had to start from scratch for many components and assemblies, the deadlines look very tight. During development, significant changes had to be made to the original terms of reference. With the specified armor thickness, it turned out to be unrealistic to keep the combat weight within 13 tons, so the bar for the AC 3 was raised to 17 tons. Since there was no tower at the time of construction, ballast was installed on top of the car instead. In this form, the cavalry tank was tested, which lasted from July 4 to August 2, 1935 in Vincennes.

AC 3 after conversion, March 1936. The tank received an APX 1 turret and a 47 mm SA 34 gun

The resulting tank from SOMUA engineers turned out to be typical of French pre-war tank building. It made maximum use of the idea of ​​Hotchkiss, which consisted in assembling a tank hull from large cast parts. The hull consisted of only four main parts: two halves of the lower part of the hull, a turret box and a box covering the engine compartment. These parts were fastened together with bolted joints. Of course, when manufacturing such large parts, the highest precision was required, but it was not difficult to assemble them.

It is worth noting that the configuration of the body of the AC 3 was still far from that which the serial machines had. There were also frank misses, the most visible of which were headlights placed right in the forehead of the hull. Not the most successful steel design and viewing devices in front of the hull. They turned out to be bulky and bolted, such a design was vulnerable. However, that's what it was made for prototype in order to identify design flaws during testing and eliminate them.

Much more important was the fact that the SOMUA AC 3 turned out to be almost the best medium tank in terms of its characteristics. Possessing anti-projectile armor, which, at a distance of over 300 meters, quite confidently "held" the shell of the German 3.7 cm Pak anti-tank gun, this vehicle had something that the Renault D2 similar to it was deprived of - good mobility. The test results exceeded the expectations of the cavalry. The maximum speed of the tracked “armored car” exceeded the requirements by 10 km / h, while the car had decent characteristics in terms of cross-country ability. The successful design of the suspension provided an acceptable ride, and visibility, despite the need to refine the viewing devices, turned out to be quite decent.

After the end of the tests, the tank went to the factory, where, until March 1936, work was carried out to remake it. Already at the end of November 1935, it was decided that AC 3 would go into series. It entered service on March 25, 1936 under the designation Automitrailleuse de Combat modèle 1935 S. Later it was called Char 1935 S, but this tank is better known as SOMUA S 35.

A masterpiece in the middle class

Contract No. 60 178 D / P for the manufacture of 50 tanks was signed on March 25, 1936, but in fact it was known as early as November 21, 1935. Initially, the cavalry had grandiose plans for the SOMUA AC 3: it was assumed that a total of 600 tanks of this type would be purchased. This number was required to equip three light mechanized divisions (Division Légère Mécanique, or DLM). However, these plans had to be adjusted quite quickly, since SOMUA's capabilities turned out to be limited. It was thanks to this that Hotchkiss was able to find a loophole for its light tank. The order was divided in half: it was supposed to purchase 300 SOMUA S 35 and Hotchkiss H 35 each.

According to the DLM staffing table, it was supposed to include 96 SOMUA S 35. Of this number, 84 vehicles were included in eight squadrons, another 4 vehicles acted as command tanks, and the remaining 8 were in reserve.

SOMUA AC 4 without turret box and engine compartment roof

The prototype returned for testing in March 1936. In addition to eliminating the design flaws found during the tests, it was distinguished by the fact that a tower was finally installed on it. The cavalrymen did not have much freedom in choosing this part of the tank: just like on the Renault D2, an APX 1 turret equipped with a 47 mm SA 34 cannon was installed on the vehicle.

However, in its original form, it was not used for long: by that time it became obvious that the SA 34 was too weak to fight tanks with an armor thickness of about 60 mm. This is how Char B1 bis was protected. For this reason, a more powerful gun, the SA 35, was soon “registered” in the tower, the projectile of which pierced 60 mm thick armor at a distance of one kilometer. However, the first 4 serial SOMUA S 35 received APX 1 turrets with SA 34 guns, which were later replaced by APX-1 CE turrets with SA 35 guns. These vehicles were manufactured in January 1936 and sent to the 4th tank (cuirassier ) regiment for testing.

SOMUA S 35, registration number 67225, the third serial copy of the tank. Additional fuel tanks are clearly visible

As a result of tests and improvements, a modernized version of the AC 3 appeared, which received the factory designation AC 4. It was this vehicle that became the model for the serial version of the SOMUA S 35. The first tanks of a large series began to be produced from July 1936, but until January 1937 these vehicles unprepared. This time, the bottleneck was the production capabilities of the subcontractor represented by APX. They had to wait for the delivery of the towers for six months, during which time one important change was made to their design of the tower. The fact is that the diameter of the shoulder strap of the APX 1 was only 1022 mm, this was not enough for the normal use of the 47 mm gun. The result of the improvements was the appearance of an improved turret, which received the designation APX 1 CE (chemin élargi, that is, increased shoulder strap). The diameter of the turret ring has grown to 1130 mm, and an additional 11 cm turned out to be not superfluous at all.

Cannons also had to wait: serial production of the SA 35 only began in January of 1937.

The same tank on the left side. On the turret box, a cast number is visible, which indicates that this is chassis No. 3

Enough changes in the design of the chassis. As a result of the alterations, the combat weight increased to 19.5 tons, but the dynamic characteristics of the vehicle remained almost at the same level as that of the AC 3. The design of the frontal part of the hull was changed. The designers removed the headlight covers, and their very form became more technologically advanced.

The design of viewing devices has noticeably improved, in addition, the driver's seat has shifted slightly forward, which has improved visibility. The front viewing device was made leaning up, which improved visibility in the stowed position. The observation devices were also changed on the tower, which, although it was called APX 1 CE, did not differ structurally from APX 4.

A number of changes have also been made to the stern of the hull. Blinds were removed from the sides of the engine deck, which were quite rightly considered a weak point. The design of the tracks has changed somewhat. Another important innovation was the appearance of additional fuel tanks. They were placed on the starboard side, thanks to the well-designed mounts, the tanks could be quickly removed.

This tank does not yet have viewing devices. There was a delay in their delivery, for this reason some of the tanks went to the troops without them

The contract for the production of the first 50 tanks was completed in the second quarter of 1937. Vehicles manufactured under it received registration numbers 67 225 - 67 274. All tanks built under this contract went to 1 DLM. Meanwhile, back in 1936, a second contract was signed with SOMUA, No. 61 361 D / P, which also provided for the production of 50 tanks. For a number of reasons, mainly related to the unhurried actions of subcontractors, the work on the production of this batch was delayed. By January 15, 1938, only 17 tanks were delivered, and all 50 vehicles were built by April 15. At the same time, the cars ended up in parts understaffed, including viewing devices.

At the Bastille Day parade held on 14 July 1938, the SOMUA S 35 was shown to the public for the first time. Tanks from the second production series, which were part of the 2nd DLM, were in the ranks. So, even on these machines there were no viewing devices in the hull. However, this is just the tip of the iceberg: in view of the slowness of the APX company, whose tank production had by that time been nationalized and renamed ARL, even by the summer of 1938, not all SOMUA S 35 had towers.

Tanks of the second series received registration numbers 22 332 - 22 381.

Tank with registration number 67237, rear view. Chains at that time were a very common type of means for hitching during transportation.

Problems with subcontractors also affected the machines of the third series, produced under contract No. 70 919 D / P, signed in 1937. Unlike the first two contracts, the third one provided for the production of 100 tanks. Vehicles that received registration numbers 819–918 were used to complete the 1st and 2nd DLM. By July 15, 1938, 28 tanks had been produced, but out of all 128 SOMUA S 35 adopted by that time, only 96 had turrets. The tanks of the third series were finally delivered in March 1939.

It may seem that the work on the release of SOMUA S 35 was slow, but in fact, 200 tanks in 2.5 years for French peacetime tank building is a lot. For comparison, the first order for Char B1 bis was received on October 8, 1936, and by March 1939, only 90 of these tanks were produced by the efforts of three companies.

First public demonstration of the SOMUA S 35, Paris, 14 July 1938. Tanks still haven't received viewing devices

Thanks to the execution of the first contracts, it was possible to completely saturate two light mechanized divisions with medium cavalry tanks. On this, of course, the release did not end. Moreover, the order was expanded to 500 tanks. In 1938, contract No. 80 353 D/P was signed for the production of 125 tanks. These machines were supposed to be sent to recruit the 3rd DML, which by that time had not yet been formed. By September 1, 1939, 61 vehicles had been handed over, 9 more were under construction. After the outbreak of World War II, the rate of production increased: if in September SOMUA delivered 11 tanks, then in the following months, Saint-Ouen left 13 vehicles a month. Thanks to this, already in the first decade of January 1940 latest tanks under contract No. 80 353 D / P left the plant. These cars received registration numbers 10 634 - 10 758.

Assembly of tanks at the SOMUA plant, November 1939. The technology of using large cast parts, assembled on bolts, greatly simplified the assembly. As a result, SOMUA provided a relatively high output rate.

At the end of September 1939, plans for the production of SOMUA S 35 were revised again. The total volume was reduced to 450 units, then it was supposed to produce a more advanced model, which received the designation SOMUA S 40. The last contract for the construction of SOMUA S 35 was to be signed back in 1938 No. 88 216 D / P, which provided for the production of 125 tanks. It began to be performed in January 1940, when 16 tanks were produced. Starting from March 1940, production volumes increased, already in May 22 tanks were delivered monthly. Registration numbers 50 210 - 50 334 were reserved for the vehicles produced under this contract. In fact, fewer tanks were produced than planned: already in June, the production facilities of SOMUA were captured by the advancing German units. By that time, according to various sources, from 427 to 440 tanks had been produced.

honey spoon

Like other French tanks, the SOMUA S 35 had a number of inherent flaws. The most significant of them was a single tower. In addition, the progressive design and decent performance cost a pretty penny. For each SOMUA S 35, you had to pay a huge amount for that time of 982,000 francs, that is, almost like five Renault R 35s.

But from the point of view of combat effectiveness, the cavalry "armored car" had no equal. Unlike slow-moving infantry tanks, SOMUA S 35 had quite decent mobility. Suffice it to say that average his speed on the highway was 30 km/h, which was more than maximum the speed of French infantry tanks. No less important is the fact that cavalry tanks were highly reliable.

sad ending campaigns of May-June 1940. The half-track tractor in the picture is SOMUA MCG, the closest relative of the AC 1

But even with 400 high-quality tanks, it was impossible to solve all the problems of the French army. It is also important that the SOMUA S 35 crews from the 1st and 2nd DLM were truly trained. The hastily formed 3rd DLM was notable for its much lower training, as de Gaulle also recalled. Attempts by the French command to plug all the new gaps in the defense with cavalry tanks were not very successful. SOMUA S 35 was that very spoon of honey in a big barrel of tar.

Nevertheless, it can be stated that the command of the French cavalry turned out to be more reasonable than the infantry command. SOMUA S 35 was one of the best tanks at the beginning of the war. These machines fought for quite a long time, however, mostly no longer under the French flag. But this will be discussed in another article.

Sources and literature:

• Materials Center des archives de l "Armement et du personnel civil (CAAPC)
• SOMUA S 35, Pascal Danjou, TRACKSTORY №1, 2003
• The Encyclopedia of French Tanks and Armored Fighting Vehicles: 1914–1940, François Vauvillier, Histoire & Collections, 2014
• GBM 105, 106, HS1

Until September 1, 1939, the French did not have time to form tank divisions. The formation of the 3rd light mechanized division advanced the furthest, and organizational measures began to form the fourth. Eight infantry divisions were motorized (1st, 3rd, 5th, 9th, 10th, 12th, 15th and 25th). Trucks were used to transport infantry. Otherwise, the tactics of motorized infantry divisions were no different from those of conventional infantry.

Motorized infantry divisions became part of army corps. And again, for the umpteenth time, the French made a gross mistake by introducing two conventional infantry divisions into the army corps along with the motorized infantry. Thus, the entire advantage of motorized infantry was nullified. The French had to spend enormous amounts of money to somehow bring up the infantry divisions to the level of mobility of motorized infantry divisions.

In January 1940, the formation of the 1st and 2nd Panzer Divisions was finally completed. Until March, the 3rd Panzer Division was formed. The last - the 4th Panzer Division - completed its formation when the fighting had already begun.

According to the state, each division was to have a semi-brigade (Demi-Brigade) of medium tanks (2 battalions of Char B1 tanks - 60 vehicles) and a semi-brigade of light tanks (2 battalions of H-39 cavalry tanks - 90 vehicles). In addition, the tank division included a motorized infantry battalion (equipped with 20 armored vehicles), 2 divisions of 105-mm howitzers, a battery of 47-mm anti-tank guns and a battery of 25-mm anti-aircraft guns.

In total, as of May 10, 1940, the French army had 49 battalions of light tanks for direct infantry support, 3 light mechanized divisions and 3 tank divisions. AT North Africa three battalions of D1 tanks, one battalion of H-35 tanks were stationed, and a battalion of R-35 tanks was based in Levanto. Light tank battalions were part of larger units: brigades, regiments and tank groups. There were 3 tank brigades (2nd, 4th and 5th) and 14 tank regiments (501st, 502nd, 503rd, 504th, 505th, 506th, 507th, 508th, 509th, 510th, 511th, 512th, 513th and 514th). The regiments and brigades were disbanded in March 1940.

Tank brigades usually consisted of two regiments, and regiments of two battalions. Each battalion consisted of about 50 vehicles.

Before the start of the offensive, the Nazis concentrated the main forces on the northern flank. Between the sea coast and Mosa, Army Group "B" was to advance, under the command of Colonel General Fedor von Bock (von Bock). Army Group "B" consisted of two armies - the 6th and 18th - a total of 29 divisions, including three armored and one motorized. These forces were supposed to tie up the Allied troops and divert them from the direction of the main attack.

The main blow was delivered by Army Group A, under the command of Gerd von Rundstedt (von Rundstedt), which united the 4th, 12th and 16th armies - a total of 45 divisions, including 7 tank and 3 motorized. The troops of Army Group A were to strike through Belgian territory south of the Liège-Charleroi line in the direction of Meyen-Saint-Quentin along a front 170 km wide - from Regen to the point where the borders of Germany, Luxembourg and France converge. The goal of Army Group A was to seize the crossings across the Mosa between Dena and Sedan at lightning speed, which made it possible to make a breakthrough at the junction of the 9th and 12th French armies and reach the rear of the Maginot line in the direction of the mouth of the Somme.

On the southern flank between the Moselle and the Swiss border, Army Group C, led by General Wilhelm Ritter von Leeb, advanced. The task of this Army Group was simply to pin down as many enemy forces as possible.

In total, the Germans fielded 10 tank divisions in the French campaign. The Nazis had 523 Pz. Kpfw. I, 955 tanks Pz. Kpfw. II, 349 tanks Pz. Kpfw. III, 278 tanks Pz. Kpfw. IV, 106 tanks Pz. Kpfw. 35(t) and 228 tanks Pz. Kpfw. 38(t). In addition, the Germans had 96 kl. Pz. BfWg. I, created on the basis of Pz. Kpfw. I and 39 command tanks Pz. BfWg. III on the chassis of the tank Pz. Kpfw. III. In general, German tanks were inferior to the French in terms of armament power and armor thickness. Tanks Pz. Kpfw. I, armed with two machine guns, did not pose any threat to the French armored vehicles. Tanks Pz. Kpfw. II, armed with a 20 mm cannon, could only inflict damage on French vehicles in unusually favorable conditions, for example, from point-blank ambush. Tanks Pz. Kpfw. III and Czech Pz. Kfw. 38(t), armed with a 37 mm cannon (Pz. Kpfw. III, armed with a 50 mm gun appeared with the Germans when the fighting was in full swing) were approximately equal to the French R-35, R-39, H-35 and H-39. The Nazis had no analogue to the French Char B1 and Somua S-35. The Germans could fight these tanks in only one way: first by breaking the caterpillar, and then, going into the flank, hit the tank from the side. The only worthy enemy for medium French tanks were Pz. Kpfw. IV. However, the fate of the campaign was not decided by the tactical and technical characteristics of the tanks. Tactics and military doctrine played a decisive role - here the advantage of the Germans over the French was overwhelming. It was only through the bitter experience of the first month of the campaign that the French command realized the magnitude of the mistake that had been made during the interwar twenty years.

Based on intelligence data, the commander of the northeastern front, French General Joseph Georges (Georges), suggested that the Germans would strike the main blow with the right flank north of Liege and Namur through Belgium, in other words, the Germans decided to repeat the "Schlieffen plan" of the 1st World War war. In order to frustrate the enemy's plans, the Allies decided to occupy defensive lines between Namur and Antwerp, along the Dil River, and give the Germans a general battle in Belgium, on the borders of which most of the German motorized infantry and tanks were concentrated. This maneuver was to be carried out by the troops of the French 1st Army Group (1st, 2nd and 7th armies), led by General Gaston Henri Billote, as well as the British expeditionary force of General John Gort (Gort).

The French occupied the defense so that the civilian population suffered as little as possible. The French were going to create a network of fortified points saturated with anti-tank weapons. According to the allies, this was supposed to force the enemy to get bogged down in battles, but due to lack of time, the French and British did not have time to implement their plan. The commander of the 1st mechanized cavalry corps (2nd and 3rd light mechanized divisions), General Prua (Proiux) wrote in his memoirs:

“On the morning of May 11, I arrived at Gamble and inspected the positions being equipped. Surprisingly: not the slightest trace of fortification work around the city - the key point of the entire operation. Only 8-9 km to the east did I find the first elements of anti-tank defense, but they did not form a continuous line and therefore had no real combat value. With confusion, I thought that the army should have carried out reconnaissance first and then started earthworks. However, the enemy did not give us time!”

The French leadership, which adopted the concept of a passive strategy, did not dare to launch preventive or counterattacks on the enemy, but simply tried to stop the Nazi offensive. According to the French command, the war was to quickly turn into a positional form. Therefore, the German troops did not meet with a proper rebuff and were able to quickly develop an offensive deep into France and reach the shores of the English Channel.

Of the three French lungs divisions one (1st light mechanized division) was given to the 1st army. The other two were merged into the 1st Mechanized Cavalry Corps, which we have already mentioned. All these forces were assembled on the Flanders front and were waiting for the enemy to attack.

General Proix's corps made contact with the German XVI Panzer Corps in the Gambloux and Namur area. On May 12-13, in the suburbs of Namur, French forces with 74 S-35 tanks, 87 H-35 tanks and 40 AMR tanks fought German tanks from the 3rd and 4th Panzer Divisions. In an unequal battle, the French managed to burn 64 German tanks. The corps delayed the advance of the enemy for two days, and then was disbanded. The divisions of the corps were distributed among the infantry corps.

The commanders of these corps, in turn, divided the light divisions into parts and reinforced the infantry divisions with these parts. The fragmented mechanized units were no longer able to play a significant role in the war. When the French command realized this mistake, it was already too late - it was already impossible to assemble parts of two divisions. Only by May 20, with great difficulty, was it possible to recreate the 3rd Mechanized Light Division bit by bit.

While the corps of General Proix was desperately trying to hold back the advance of the enemy near Gamble, nearby - near Crean - the 2nd cuirassier regiment of the French fought a heavy battle with the German 35th tank regiment of the 4th tank division. In the battle, the French lost 11 H-39 tanks.

On the Belgian border, the French concentrated all three of their panzer divisions. Two of them were not fully equipped and together they had 136 tanks. The third division had a staffing strength of 180 vehicles.

Meanwhile, motorized units from Army Group A passed the Ardennes, which were considered impassable, and crossed the Mosa between Givet and Sedan from the march. Thus, the Germans entered the rear of the Allied troops in Flanders. The entire Allied defense plan was a complete fiasco. The Anglo-French troops had to start a retreat.

To contain the enemy's advance, the French command decided to use its mechanized units. On May 14, 1940, the 1st Panzer Division, which was part of the French 9th, was to attack the German troops that had crossed the Mosa. On the evening of May 13, the division took up its original positions ... and remained there due to lack of fuel! The delay allowed the reconnaissance of the German XIX motorized corps (1st, 2nd and 10th Panzer divisions) to detect the French. On May 14, the Germans were the first to strike. Near Bulson, the French 1st Panzer Division lost 20 tanks. Things were even worse near Chemery, where 50 French tanks were left to burn. Many tanks, standing without fuel, destroyed the crews. The French had one thing to do - retreat. We had to retreat under continuous German air raids. By May 16, the French 1st Panzer Division already had only 17 combat-ready vehicles. On the night of May 16-17, these crumbs were also lost. So already a week after the start of hostilities and just three days after arriving at the front line, the 1st Panzer Division ceased to exist!

The fate of the 2nd Panzer Division was a little better. On May 14, 1940, the division set out from Champagne, with tanks being transferred by rail, and wheeled vehicles moving under their own power. Already on May 15, parts of the division were separated by a German wedge. From that moment on, the 2nd Panzer Division also did not exist as a single tactical formation! The front commander ordered the tanks of the 2nd division to be unloaded from the platforms and placed in small groups in the area of ​​crossings across the Oise River. The task of the tanks was to delay the German units crossing the river. On May 15, units of General Reinhardt's XXXXI corps crossed the river. The French tanks supporting the infantry fought bravely, but were all put out of action. The German offensive continued successfully.

On May 14, 1940, the French 3rd Panzer Division was placed at the disposal of the commander of the 2nd Army. Like the 1st Panzer, the 3rd Panzer Division was ordered to counterattack the enemy in the Moza area, but did not follow the order. The delay occurred for two reasons: firstly, the division was on the defensive, so it had to regroup its forces to go on the offensive; secondly, the command order was inaccurate and did not contain specific indications of the place of attack and possible enemy forces. Therefore, the division remained on the defensive lines and gradually the Germans drove it to the Oise.

On May 11, 1940, Colonel Charles de Gaulle was appointed commander of the 4th Panzer Division. Despite the fact that the division had not yet completed its formation, it was thrown into battle. In total, the division had 215 tanks (120 R-35s, 45 D2s and 50 B1bis). The only infantry unit of the division was a motorized infantry battalion transported on buses! There were practically no radio stations in the division, and orders were delivered to the units by cyclists! The artillery of the division consisted of several parts of the reserve. Supply and maintenance services were practically non-existent. In principle, this unit can hardly even be called a division - it was a motley mixture of disparate units and subunits that happened to be together. Despite everything, the young division commander was able to make a formidable fighting force out of this booth.

On May 16, 1940, the division of General de Gaulle (on May 14 he was promoted to brigadier general) attacked the southern flank of the German wedge (1st, 2nd and 6th tank divisions) in the Montcornet area.

Realizing that the enemy had a numerical superiority, de Gaulle acted very carefully and tried only to delay the advance of the enemy.

The 49th Panzer Battalion was sent out to reconnoiter Montcornet and tried to enter the city from the southwest. With a swift attack, the French dispersed the outposts of the German 10th Panzer Division. However, the Germans managed to surround the battalion, all of whose personnel were captured. The 4th Panzer Division continued to adhere to this "cavalry charge" tactic, striking where it was least expected. On May 19, several tanks of de Gaulle's division attacked the headquarters of the XIX motorized corps of the Germans, located in the forest of Olno. The headquarters was covered only by a battery of 20-mm anti-aircraft guns. The battle lasted several hours, despite the desperate efforts of the French, the Germans were able to hold their positions.

The tank divisions of the Nazis continued to roll forward uncontrollably. Nothing and no one could stop their progress. By May 20, 1940, the ticks around the Allied forces in Flanders had completely closed. The French and British had to either fight their way to their own or retreat to Dunkirk or Calais. On May 21, 98 British tanks from 4 and 7 RTR were ordered to attack the flank German troops near Arras. The British attack was covered by 70 French S-35s from the 3rd Mechanized Light Division. The attackers were quickly successful. The 1st Battalion of the 6th Motorized Infantry Regiment of the 7th Panzer Division of the Germans was dispersed. To close the gap at the front, the Germans transferred the 25th Tank Regiment there. Having lost 25 vehicles, the Germans were still able to hold their positions.

After this defeat, the Allies had only one thing left - evacuation to England. Boulogne and Calais were lost, the only port remaining in the hands of the British and French was Dunkirk. It was there that the Allied troops retreated. Completely demoralized, pressed to the ground by continuous German air raids, this grouping no longer participated in the campaign.

At the end of May, the 4th Panzer Division of General de Gaulle once again declared itself. Its already badly battered forces hit the German flank in the Abbeville area. The French went on the counterattack twice - on May 27 and 28. However, the Germans were able to hold their positions, inflicting heavy losses on the French.

Already on May 20, 1940, the British began to send equipment to Dunkirk necessary for the evacuation. On May 26, the British command put the Dynamo plan into action. Despite the constant attacks of the German infantry and the raids of the Luftwaffe bombers, the British in an organized manner managed to take out from the continent the entire personnel of the Expeditionary Force and a significant part of the French troops that fell into the bag. But since the Battle of Flanders was lost, the Allies lost more than half of their troops there.

Before the start of the second stage of the campaign, which was supposed to decide the fate of France, the French still had quite impressive forces: 61 divisions of their own, 2 Polish divisions and 2 British divisions. More than 1,200 tanks remained on the line, but these tanks were divided into small groups and assigned to different units.

These forces were supposed to save France, relying on the line of defense over the Somme. Since there was no Maginot Line here, the French command organized a chain of improvised anti-tank obstacles - "hedgehogs" in this sector. Behind the hedgehogs are infantry, artillery and tanks. But unfortunately, the “hedgehogs” did not form a continuous line, and units of the Wehrmacht broke through between them. And the French did not have at hand mobile units capable of quickly being in a threatened point.

On June 5, the day after the occupation of Dunkirk, Army Group B went on the attack. The purpose of the offensive was to capture the southern bank of the Somme. The tank formations of Generals Hoth and Kleist went into the breakthrough, attacking the defensive formations of the 7th and 10th French Armies.

On June 10, 1940, in the area of ​​Avanson and Tagnon, over the Rethorn River, the newly formed XXXIX Motorized Corps of General Guderian went on the attack. Moving across the open countryside, the German tanks encountered virtually no resistance from the French. The German units immediately crossed Rethorn in the Neuflies area. Shortly after noon, the Nazis reached Gennivil. At this moment, units of the French 3rd Panzer and 7th Infantry Divisions went on the counterattack. To the south of the city there was an oncoming tank battle that lasted two hours. In this battle, the Germans suffered heavy losses, the aggressors had a particularly hard time when the French Char B1bis medium tanks entered into action, the armor of which kept hits from armor-piercing shells of 20 and 37 mm caliber. However, the numerical superiority was on the side of the Nazis, and despite heavy losses, they were able to push the French back to La Neuville. In the evening, the fighting resumed with renewed vigor, this time south of Gennevil. Again, French tanks from the divisions mentioned above went on the attack. The French planned to take Perth by storm, but the Germans were once again able to hold their ground.

On June 11, the German 1st Panzer Division attacked the French in the La Neuville area and was able to break through the enemy defenses. Only over the Suip River did the French attempt to launch a counteroffensive. The gap in the defenses tried to close 50 French tanks from the 3rd Panzer Division, supported by soldiers from the 3rd Infantry Division. But this attack also failed.

On June 12, the Germans widened the gap in the French defenses and separated the Allied western flank from the main forces defending Alsace, Lorraine and the Maginot Line.

On June 14, General von Leeb's Army Group C went on the offensive, the 1st Army of which struck from the Saarbrücken region to the south, and the 7th Army crossed the Rhine, occupied Colmar and met with Guderian's tanks in the Vosges region.

On the same day, the Germans entered Paris without a fight. Three days later, Marshal Pétain announced on the radio a request for a truce. This performance finally broke the morale of the French army. Only a few units continued to resist. The French, who at first did not want to die for Gdansk, as it turned out, were not at all eager to die for Paris. On June 22, an armistice was signed. The French army was completely defeated, the campaign in the west came to an end.

In this war, the tank units of the French army were completely destroyed. It turned out that not the number of tanks, but the tactics of their use decide the outcome of the battle. The French were not able to operate as effectively with large tank formations as their enemy did. Instead of gathering their tanks into one powerful fist, the French sprayed them all over the front. Very rarely did the French try to use tanks as their main fighting force in the offensive, and if they did, they used too few tanks. At best, one incomplete tank division went on the attack. As a result, the attack choked, bumping into the enemy's defenses, equipped with tanks and anti-tank guns. Often such attacks ended in the complete defeat of the attacking side. Quite often, the French tried to use tanks on terrain that was completely unsuitable for the use of armored vehicles. The only motive for such actions was the desire to show the infantry that they were "not alone on the battlefield." As a result, in the main directions of attack, the Nazis had a colossal superiority in tanks. The French tried to transfer one or two tank divisions to the threatened sector of the front, but as a rule it was already too late.

Hello fellow tankers! Today we will look at French tank development branch(in game world of Tanks), or rather, I will describe to you all its pros and cons in as much detail as possible from my point of view and, perhaps, help you decide on the choice of a nation.

The popularity of French tanks in World of Tanks

Advantages and disadvantages of French tanks

• Significant pluses are French guns. For many, the presence is controversial, although in general it often helps out in difficult situations. The real advantage of their guns is armor penetration. Every tank is different. One-time damage cannot be attributed to pluses (except for top tank destroyers), but it is covered by the same drum. French tanks have good visibility, tilt angles, which are often passed through and good maneuverability (on soils, roads, etc.).
• Minus the French is the hull reservation. In almost all cars, it suffers greatly. Even heavy tanks penetrate frontal armor quite easily and can only tank through a turret or track. A big minus is the long reload time of the gun drum.

General

fri-sau

Armored light tanks

Heavily armored light tanks

ACS

Outcome

The creation of armored vehicles in France went on even during the occupation of the country by the Nazi invaders. The liberation of the territory of France marked for her not only a victory, but also a difficult process of restoration and creation of her own army. Ours begins with the transition tank ARL-44. Start of development - 38 years. It was a new type of tanks based on the B1 chassis. According to the project, the tank was to receive a turret of a new type of design and a 75 mm long-barreled gun. By the beginning of the war, work on the creation of the tank was at the level of development. But even during the occupation design work the tank was carried out no less successfully than before it. And when France was liberated, the first sample of the new tank was immediately put into production. In series new tank went in 46, which for France was undoubtedly a feat of industry, given the fact of a five-year occupation. Due to various reasons, the tank became a kind of transitional model and enters service as the ARL - 44. The French military wanted to get 300 units of such tanks, but only 60 vehicles of this series were built. They were adopted by the 503rd Tank Regiment.

The tanks were manufactured by Renault and FAMH Schneider, the latter producing a new type of turret. From the "B1" the new tank got a morally obsolete suspension and caterpillar tracks. In terms of speed characteristics, the tank turned out to be the slowest post-war tank and had a maximum speed of 37 km / h. But the engine and hull were new developments, the armor plates on the hull were placed at an angle of 45 degrees, which gave the frontal armor the equivalent of 17 centimeters of normally installed armor. The turret of the tank was the most modern of the new machine. The disadvantage of the tower is the poor quality of the connecting seams, and the French industry was simply unable to make such a tower completely cast. A 90 mm Schneider gun was installed on the tower. In general, the ARL-44 turned out to be an “unsuccessful” tank, but do not forget that the tank was a transitional model, it had elements of both new and old tanks. And the task of the tank was essentially "non-military" - the tank, with its production, revived French tank building from the ashes, for which many thanks to him.

The next tank developed by French specialists was the AMX 12t. This is the younger brother of the future French AMX 13. Already from the name it is clear that the weight of this tank was 12 tons. Chassis younger brother had a rear track roller, which was at the same time a sloth. As it turned out, this configuration of the rollers was unreliable and caused constant problems with the tension of the tracks. This undercarriage with a modified configuration of the rollers, where the sloth became a separate element of the undercarriage, which led to an elongation of the tank hull, became the basis for the creation of the legend of the French tank builders "AMX-13". The AMX 12t turret was the progenitor of the AMX-13 tank turret. The tank, according to the project, was equipped with an automatic loader.

46 year. The design phase of the new tank has been completed. According to the requirements, the AMX 13 had a light weight for movement by aircraft in support of paratroopers. The new AMX 13 gets a torsion bar suspension, the engine is located in front and on the right, while the driver-mechanic was located on the left. The main feature that makes this tank unique is the oscillating turret. The turret was equipped with a top-mounted gun. With vertical aiming of the gun, only the upper part itself was used. The tower was installed in the aft part of the hull, and it housed the rest of the crew of the armored vehicle - the commander and gunner. 75 mm tank gun was designed with German guns"7.5 cm KwK 42 L / 70", such were on the "Panthers" and it was provided a wide range shells. The tower received a rather interesting automatic drum-type reloading system - 2 drums, each with 6 shells. The drums were in the rear of the tower. Ammunition of 12 ammunition allowed the tank to fire very quickly, but as soon as the ammunition in the drums ran out, the tank had to take cover and reload the drums manually, outside the vehicle.

Serial production of the AMX 13 began in 1952, for its production the facilities of the Atelier de Construction Roanne were used. For almost 30 years he entered service with the French Armed Forces. Several hundred units of the AMX 13 are still serving in French tank units. One of the most massive European tanks, delivered to 25 countries. Today, there are about a hundred modifications of the tank. All kinds of armored vehicles are created on its basis: self-propelled guns, air defense systems, armored personnel carriers and self-propelled ATGMs.

AMX-13 / 90- is the first modification of the main AMX 13. Entered service in the early 60s. The main difference is the installed 90 mm gun, equipped with a casing and a muzzle brake. Ammunition was slightly reduced - now the tank gun had 32 ammunition, of which 12 were installed in the drum magazine. The gun could fire high-explosive, armor-piercing, cumulative, sub-caliber shells.

Batignolles-Chatillon 25t is a design modification of the main AMX 13. Only two units of this modification were created. To improve survivability, vehicles are increased in size and given additional armor. These and several other changes in total gave the weight of the tank - 25 tons. According to the project, the tank team consisted of 4 people, the design speed of this modification was 65 km / h.

"Lorraine 40t" was created in pursuit of such monsters as the Soviet IS-2 -3 and the German "Tiger II". Of course, the tank could not catch up with these outstanding tanks either in terms of armor or mass, and, probably, installing 100 mm, and then 120 mm guns was a kind of attempt to get closer to them. But all projects of such tanks either remained on paper or were released in limited quantities. All projects in this series used the German Maybach as a remote control. "Lorraine 40t" were released in 2 prototypes. In fact, this is a somewhat lightweight "AMX-50". Were present in the decision of the tank and distinctive features: turret located in the bow of the tank, and "pike nose" - similar to the IS-3. Rubber tires were also used for the road wheels, which gave the tank additional cushioning.

"M4" - the first model of a heavy tank. In order to somehow catch up with the USSR and Germany in the creation of heavy tanks, French designers begin building their own heavy tank. The first modification is called "M4" or project 141. This model practically copied the German Tiger. The undercarriage received small-linked caterpillars and “chessboard” track rollers, a torsion-type suspension with hydraulic shock absorption. The ground clearance of the tank could be changed up to 100 mm. The difference from the German tiger - the transmission and drive rollers were stern. According to the design of the tank, it was supposed to weigh about 30 tons, but in practice this would have to reduce the armor to 3 centimeters. It looked quite ridiculous against the background of the "Tiger" and IS. The armor is increased to 9 centimeters and set at optimal angles, so the weight of the vehicle has increased significantly compared to the design. The tank received a 90 mm Schneider in a classic turret and a 7.62 mm machine gun. The team of the car is five people. This model was not released even in the prototype, as a decision was made to replace the classic turret with a new one from FAMH

"AMH-50 - 100 mm" - serial heavy tank. The main feature - due to the parallel development of the AMX-50 and AMX-13, they have a great external resemblance to the latter.
49 year. Two units of the AMX-50 - 100 mm tank are being produced. 51 years old - the tank is in service with the French Armed Forces in a small series. The tank turned out to be very good and compares favorably with the American and British counterparts. But due to the constant lack of funds, "AMX-50 - 100 mm" did not become bulk tank. From the layout - the MTO was in the stern of the hull, the driver-mechanic with an assistant were in the control department, the vehicle commander was located in the turret to the left of the gun, the gunner to the right. The body of the cast type is made with optimal placement of the frontal armor at an angle, the thickness of the frontal and upper side armor plates is 11 centimeters. The nose-to-side transition is made thanks to beveled surfaces. It differs from the M4 project in additional rollers (5 external and 4 internal types). The machine gun from the front sheet is replaced by a machine gun coaxial with the gun. In addition, the turret received an autonomous anti-aircraft installation - two 7.62-mm machine guns. The turret of the pumping type was developed by FAMH. Until the year 50, a 90 mm gun was installed in it, then a 100 mm gun was placed in a slightly modified tower. The rest of the turret design corresponds to the design of the AMX-13 turret. DU - petrol Maybach "HL 295" or engine "Saurer" diesel type. The designers expected that the use of engines with a capacity of 1000 hp would make it possible for the tank to acquire a speed of about 60 km / h. But as time has shown, the tank could not overcome the bar of 55 km/h.

"AMX-65t" - the Char de 65t tank - an advanced project for a heavy tank. The beginning of the main developments - 50 years. Chess-type suspension, four-row arrangement of rollers. Frontal armor of the "pike nose" type similar to the Soviet IS-3 with a smaller inclined angle. The rest is a copy of the Royal Tiger. According to the project DU - 1000 strong Maybach engine. Possible armament - 100 mm gun and anti-aircraft type machine gun.

"AMX-50 - 120 mm" - a heavy tank. Had three modifications 53, 55 and 58 years. French "competitor" of the Soviet IS-3. The frontal part is made, like that of a competitor, - according to the "pike nose" type. Modification of 53 years old had a classic-type turret with a 120-mm caliber gun. But the design turned out to be inconvenient. Modification 55 years- a tower of a pumping type with a 20-mm cannon paired with a 120 mm gun to destroy lightly armored vehicles. Significantly reinforced frontal armor, almost twice. This leads to a serious increase in weight: up to 64 tons against the previous 59 tons. The military department did not like this modification due to the increased weight. Modification 58 years."Lightweight" up to 57.8 tons modification "AMH-50 - 120 mm". It had a cast hull and rounded frontal armor. It was planned to use a thousand-strong Maybach as a remote control. However, the engine did not live up to expectations: out of the declared 1.2 thousand horses, the engine did not even give 850 hp. The use of a 120 mm gun made reloading inconvenient, and it was difficult for one or two people to move the ammunition from the gun. The team of the car was 4 people, and although the fourth member of the crew was listed as a radio operator, he was actually reloading. The tank was not built due to the appearance of HEAT shells, the armor given to such shells was a weak hindrance. The project is curtailed, but not forgotten. The developments will be used in the development of the project "OBT AMX-30"

Not only tanks
The AMX 105 AM or M-51 is the first self-propelled vehicle based on the AMX-13, a self-propelled 105 mm howitzer. The first sample was created in the year 50. The first serial self-propelled guns joined the ranks of the armed forces of France in 52. The self-propelled guns had a fixed, shifted to the stern, open cabin. A 105 mm Mk61 of the 50th model was installed in the wheelhouse. The gun had a muzzle brake. A 7.62 mm anti-aircraft machine gun was also placed there. Some AMX 105 AM self-propelled guns were armed with an additional 7.5 mm machine gun, which was installed in a turret with circular rotation. The main disadvantage is the slow aiming at the next target. Ammunition 56 ammunition, which included armor-piercing shells. The range of defeat with high-explosive ammunition is 15 thousand meters. The barrel was produced in 23 and 30 calibers, it was provided with a two-chamber muzzle brake. To control the fire, the AMX 105 AM self-propelled guns were equipped with a 6x sight and a 4x goniometer. These self-propelled guns were exported - they were used by Morocco, Israel and the Netherlands.

"AMH-13 F3 AM" - the first European post-war self-propelled guns. Adopted in the 60s. The self-propelled guns had a 155 mm caliber gun, 33 calibers long and a range of up to 25 kilometers. Rate of fire - 3 rds / min. "AMX-13 F3 AM" did not take ammunition with it, it was carried by a truck for it. Ammunition - 25 shells. The truck also transported 8 people - the ACS team. The very first "AMX-13 F3 AM" had a gasoline 8-cylinder engine with liquid cooling "Sofam Model SGxb.". The latest self-propelled guns had a 6-cylinder liquid-cooled diesel engine "Detroit Diesel 6V-53T". The diesel engine was more powerful than the gasoline engine and allowed the self-propelled guns to move 400 kilometers at a speed of 60 km / h.

"BATIGNOLLES-CHATILLON 155mm" self-propelled gun project. The main idea is to install a rotating type tower. The beginning of work on the creation of a sample - 55 years. The tower was completed in 1958. In 1959, the project was abandoned, the prototype of the self-propelled guns was not built. According to the project, the speed is 62 km/h, the weight is 34.3 tons, the team consists of 6 people.

"Lorraine 155" - self-propelled guns of types 50 and 51. The basis of the project is the base "Lorraine 40t" with the installation of a 155 mm howitzer gun. The main idea is the placement of the casemate part. Initially, on the first sample, it was located in the center of the ACS, on the next sample, it shifted to the bow of the ACS. Having a chassis with rubberized rollers made the self-propelled guns an interesting option to use. But in 55, the project was closed in favor of another ACS project "BATIGNOLLES-CHATILLON". Basic data: weight - 30.3 tons, crew - 5 people, travel speed - up to 62 km / h. The armament of the self-propelled guns is a 155 mm howitzer and a 20 mm cannon paired with it.

"AMX AC de 120" is the first project of a self-propelled gun mount based on the "M4" model of 46. Received a "chess" suspension and cabin in the bow. Outwardly, it resembled the German "JagdPanther". Design data: ACS weight - 34 tons, armor - 30/20 mm, crew - 4 people. Armament: 120 mm "Schneider" and a turret machine gun to the right of the wheelhouse. DU Maybach "HL 295" with a capacity of 1.2 thousand hp "AMX AC de 120" - the second project of a self-propelled gun mount based on the "M4" model 48. The main change is the cabin design. The silhouette of the car is changing: it becomes noticeably lower. Now the ACS has become similar to the "JagdPzIV". The armament has changed: the cabin of the self-propelled guns received a 20 mm "MG 151" turret, the feed of the self-propelled guns two 20 mm "MG 151".

And the last project reviewed is the AMX-50 Foch. Self-propelled gun mount based on the "AMX-50", receives a 120 mm gun. The outlines of the self-propelled guns resembled the German "JagdPanther". There was a machine-gun turret with the Reibel ZP on remote control. The commander's tower was provided with a rangefinder. The ACS driver observed the situation through the existing periscope. The main purpose is to support 100 mm tanks, destroy the most dangerous armored vehicles of the enemy. After successful tests in 51, a small number goes into service with the French Armed Forces. After, with the standardization of weapons of NATO members, self-propelled guns are removed from the assembly line and in 52 the project is closed in favor of the tank project “creating AMX-50-120”.