Detection of torpedoes on the destroyer Arly Burke. Destroyers "Arleigh Burke" - champions with missile weapons

In June 2011, the command of the military naval forces The United States has announced its plans for the future of US Navy destroyers. Promising squadrons turned out to be too expensive for mass production, so it was decided to leave the Arleigh Burk project as the main destroyer of the Navy. In addition, the fleet will be replenished with ships of the Arleigh Burke type until the beginning of the thirties of this century.

During this time, American shipyards will assemble two dozen destroyers. Based on the normal service life of ships in the United States Navy, it can be assumed that the last ship of the Arleigh Burke class will be withdrawn from the fleet only in the seventies of this century. Apparently, the US Navy command has its own considerations that allow these destroyers to be included in such a distant future.

In addition to this, Spruance class destroyers, despite the available weapons, were listed in official documents as ordinary destroyers, and the time and situation required full-fledged URO destroyers (with controlled missile weapons). Work on the formation of the appearance of the new ship and the terms of reference for it took several years, and the development competition began only in 1980. It took seven shipbuilding companies at once about three years to create competitive preliminary designs, after which three contestants remained: Bath Iron Works, Ingalls Shipbuilding and Todd Shipyard.

The third firm was never able to get the “attention” of the tender committee, which is why the construction of the first two ships of the new project was entrusted to Bath Iron Works and Ingalls Shipbuilding, respectively. The project, as well as its lead ship, was named after Admiral Orly Albert Burke, who commanded various destroyer formations for most of World War II.

The contract with the Bath Iron Works for 322 million dollars was awarded in April 85th. However, the total cost of the lead destroyer turned out to be several times higher. Taking into account all electronic equipment, weapons, etc. it cost the Pentagon $1.1 billion.

As a result, the destroyer USS Mahan, ordered back in 1992, was completed as the first ship of the second series. The construction of the destroyers of the Flight II version had a more modest scale: only seven ships. It is argued that a small second series was originally considered as a transitional link from the first to the third. And so it happened, however, contrary to logic, the new version of the project had not a triple in the index, but the designation IIA. This line turned out to be the most numerous.

At the moment, 34 Arleigh Burke destroyers of the IIA series have been built and their construction continues. The total number of ships according to the old plans was to be 75 units, but for now only 62 destroyers are ready.
Most likely, those 24 destroyers that will be ordered later will be made according to the next version of the project.

In engineering terms, this was a good undertaking, but the experience of fighting with the participation of aluminum ships forced a return to steel. Only a few parts, such as masts, are made of aluminum on the Arleigh Burke destroyers. The low-sitting hull has a relatively small flare in the bow and a relatively wide middle section. This hull shape slightly increases water resistance, but improves stability and reduces pitching. On ships of the IIA series, a bow bulb was added to compensate for the deterioration of the flow due to the peculiarities of the hull contours.

Watertight bulkheads divide the internal volume of the hull into 13 compartments. It is curious that the lower decks have a layout that allows you to move around the ship without restrictions without leaving the upper deck. This is done so that the crew is not at risk if the enemy uses weapons of mass destruction. In addition to specially planned interiors, the crew is protected from chemical, biological and nuclear weapons by a special ventilation system with multiple filtration of the air taken from outside.

"Arleigh Burke" became the first American destroyers, whose hull and superstructure are made using stealth technology. To reduce radar visibility, the outer surface of the ship's superstructure consists of several large, even panels mated at sharp angles, which leads to a noticeable scattering of radio waves. Chimney casings are made in a similar way. In addition, the exhaust of the power plant passes through a special mixing chamber before being released, where it is mixed with atmospheric air and cooled.

As a result, ships of the Arleigh Burke type have almost half the radar and thermal visibility than their Spruence-class predecessors. The use of large parts that reduce visibility, among other things, made it possible to make the design of the ship modular. Thanks to this, 10-15 weeks pass from the laying of the ship to its launch.

The twin-shaft power plant of the Arleigh Burke destroyers of all series is composed of four LM2500 gas turbine engines manufactured by General Electric. Each engine is equipped with a thermal insulation circuit, which reduces fuel consumption by up to a quarter, and is mounted on shock-absorbing mounts to reduce noise. The entire power plant of the ship is a single module, which, if necessary, can be dismantled entirely.

The maximum possible power of the power plant is in the range of 100-105 thousand horsepower. As backup engines, destroyers of all series have three Allison 2500 gas turbine engines. The power of the main and standby engines is transmitted to two shafts that rotate five-blade variable-pitch propellers.

The destroyers of the Arleigh Burke project are capable of speeds up to 32 knots, but the maximum cruising range is achieved at an economic speed of 20 knots. In this case, destroyers of the first series can travel up to 4,400 nautical miles, and ships of series II and IIA - 500 miles more. At the same time, some American sources claim that reducing the speed to 18 knots can bring the cruising range up to six thousand miles. However, there are some doubts about this.

The first 28 ships of the Arleigh Burke type (series I and II) had a crew of 320-350 people: 22-25 officers and 300-330 sailors, warrant officers, etc. The difference in numbers was due to some differences in armament and in the number of helicopters. On the ships of the IIA series, the required number of crew in a number of services was revised and a maintenance group for two helicopters was added. All this led to an increase in the crew to 380 people (32 officers).

The Americans especially note the fact that designers and ergonomics specialists participated in the layout of the living quarters of the Arleigh Burke ships. Due to this, with an area of about four square meters per person managed to create all the necessary conditions for normal living.

The armament of the Arleigh Burke destroyers includes many systems, but its basis is the Aegis control system (read "Aegis"). This multifunctional combat information and control system (CICS) combines a whole set of detection, control and destruction tools. Aegis includes a multifunctional phased array radar, air and surface target detection radar, electronic warfare equipment, communications equipment, etc. In addition, Aegis has a number of subsystems for outputting information, transmitting data to other ships, and direct weapon control systems.

Missiles are the main armament of the Arleigh Burke destroyers. various types . In the bow and stern of ships of all series there are universal silo launchers Mk 41. On ships of series I and II, the bow and stern launchers have 30 and 60 cells, respectively. On the IIA series, the number of cells increased to 32 and 64.

A transport and launch container with a BGM-109 Tomahawk cruise missile, an SM-2 or SM-3 anti-aircraft missile or a block of four containers with RIM-7 Sea Sparrow anti-aircraft missiles can be placed in one cell. The launcher equipment makes it possible to simultaneously prepare 16 missiles of various types for launch and launch them at a rate of one missile per second.

In addition to launchers, the Mk 41 has several cranes for loading TPK with missiles. However, the features of the crane equipment and the design of the destroyer do not allow reloading Tomahawk or SM-2/3 missiles from supply ships. Loading such weapons is possible only in the conditions of the base. This disadvantage is compensated by the flexibility of the range of weapons: if the ship is to attack ground targets, then it will receive Tomahawks, if the ship will perform air defense functions, it will be loaded with Sea Sparrow or SM-2 / 3.

The "main caliber" of the destroyers' artillery weapons is the 127-mm Mk 45 mount. At the same time, the Mk 45 Mod was installed on the first 30 copies of the Arleigh Burke. 2, on the rest - Mk 45 Mod. 4. A mount with bulletproof armor can aim a 127-mm rifled gun in the range from -15° to +65° vertically and in almost all horizontal directions, of course, with the exception of the sector covered by the ship's superstructure.

The rate of fire of the Mk 45 with conventional projectiles reaches 20 rounds per minute, and in the case of guided munitions, it drops by half.
The maximum firing range of an unguided projectile for the Mk 45 mod. 4 is 35-38 kilometers.
When using an ERGM guided active rocket, this figure increases to 115 kilometers.
In the artillery cellar of the destroyers "Arleigh Burke" fits in the ammunition load of 680 shells of various types. It takes about 15-16 hours to load all this number of shells.

Anti-aircraft artillery "Arleigh Burke" can be equipped with various types of weapons. On ships of the I, II series, as well as on the first several destroyers of the IIA series, six-barreled 20-mm anti-aircraft guns Mk 15 Phalanx CIWS with a rate of fire up to 3000 rounds per minute. A smaller number of ships were equipped with 25-mm Bushmaster automatic guns, and almost all Arleigh Burke have several (from three to six) on board heavy machine guns Browning M2HB.

Despite their original purpose, the M2HB and Bushmaster are ineffective for air defense. Therefore, they are used only for training personnel and shelling small targets, like light boats and motor boats.

To destroy more serious surface targets, the destroyers of all three series have 2 built-in Mk 32 torpedo tubes with a total ammunition load of 6 torpedoes. These can be Mk 46 or Mk 50. When creating the Arleigh Burke destroyers, the main emphasis was on missile weapons, so reloading torpedo tubes by the crew after firing all six torpedoes is not provided. In early versions of the project, engineers considered the possibility of using depth charges on the Arleigh Burke, but this tactical and technical solution did not even reach Flight I.

One SH-60 helicopter could be based on the deck of ships of the first and second series. Near the landing site there was a kerosene tank and a small "warehouse" with weapons - nine Mk 46 torpedoes. Helicopters intended for deployment on the Arleigh Burke destroyers are equipped with the LAMPS-3 anti-submarine system integrated into the overall Aegis CICS.

Due to the limited volumes of the ships of the first two series, they did not have any means of maintaining or repairing the helicopter, other than those that are on board. Thus, any more or less serious damage led to the fact that the ship was left without rotorcraft "eyes". When creating the version of the IIA project, these shortcomings were taken into account and the shipbuilders made a special helicopter hangar in the aft part of the ship's hull, due to which the destroyer's aviation group doubled.

This is what required the introduction of an aircraft maintenance group into the crew. The engineers also increased the arsenal for helicopter armament: on the Arleigh Burke of the IIA series, it fits up to 40 torpedoes, air-to-ground missiles of various types, and even several MANPADS.

Destroyers of the Arleigh Burke type participated in several military conflicts, starting almost from the very beginning of their service. Iraq in 1996, 1998 and 2003, Yugoslavia in 1999 and several other operations. Thanks to his a large number(currently there are sixty ships in service) these destroyers participate in almost every campaign of the US Navy. However, in Russia these ships are better known thanks to the "mission" of the destroyer USS McFaul (DDG-74), which he carried out in August 2008. Recall that then, a few days after the end of the infamous "War of the Three Eights", this ship brought 55 tons of humanitarian cargo to the Georgian port of Batumi.

In addition to combat successes and an interesting design, the Arleigh Burke destroyers are in some way record holders in the US Navy. The fact is that with a total displacement of about 8500 tons (series I), 9000 tons (series II) and 9650 (series IIA) "Arleigh Burke" is the most massive American warship with a displacement of more than five thousand tons.. This fact suggests that this type of ship is an undoubted success of American shipbuilding.

Also in favor of the success of the project is the fact that the Japanese were interested in it at one time. In 1993-95, four destroyers of the Kongo type entered the Japan Self-Defense Forces. In fact, these are the same Arleigh Burke, but modified in such a way as to comply with the legal features of the Japanese fleet.

Like any other project, "Arleigh Burke" eventually had to be replaced by more new technology. But, unfortunately for the US Navy, promising project destroyer URO called Zumwalt turned out to be much more expensive than planned. Thanks to such a failure of the Zamvolta, the Arleigh Burke will remain in service in the future.

When these ships were put into service, it was planned that they would serve for about 35 years. But the lack of the possibility of mass production of Zumwalt destroyers forced the command of the US Navy to start creating a new version of the project last year ( series III) and outline plans for the purchase of 24 ships in addition to the 75 already ordered.

Together with the assumption about the possible duration of the Arleigh Burke's service until the 2070s, this could help these destroyers set another record. This time it's about durability.

/Based on materials topwar.ru and en.wikipedia.org /

The Arleigh Burke class destroyers are a type of URO (guided missile) destroyers of the third generation. Destroyers have been built by order of the US Navy since 1988,

the construction of ships of this type continues. The name of the type was given by the lead ship, the destroyer URO Arleigh Burke, named after the American admiral of World War II Arleigh Albert Burke.

The first Arleigh Burke-class destroyer was commissioned into the US Atlantic Fleet on July 4, 1991.
After the decommissioning of the last Spruence-class destroyer, USS Cushing, on September 21, 2005, the only type of URO destroyers left in the US Navy was the Arleigh Burke destroyers.
As of September 2009, the Arleigh Burke destroyer is the largest-scale type of surface warship with a total displacement of more than 5,000 tons in the entire post-war history fleet. Given the rather low pace of construction of destroyers in other states, in the coming years, not a single state in the world will be able to beat this kind of record.

In addition to the US Navy, 4 ships of the Arleigh Burke type, albeit with a slightly modified design and built according to civilian standards (destroyers of the Congo type), are in service with the Japanese Naval Self-Defense Forces.
For 2000, it was planned to introduce three more ships into the Japanese Navy by 2010, upgraded to the level of the IIA series, but at present, the construction of these ships has been abandoned in favor of more advanced Atago-class destroyers.

Purpose

The main combat missions assigned to destroyers of the Arleigh Burke URO type include:

1. Protection of own aircraft carrier and ship strike groups from massive enemy missile attacks, which uses anti-ship missiles launched both from surface ships and from nuclear submarines with missile systems.

2. Air defense of own forces (naval formations, convoys or individual ships) from enemy aircraft.

The secondary tasks of ships of this type are:

1. The fight against submarines and surface ships of the enemy;

2. Ensuring a naval blockade of certain areas;

3. Artillery support for landing operations;

4. Tracking enemy ships;

5. Participation in search and rescue operations.

Thanks to the combat capabilities of the Aegis system, destroyers of the Arleigh Burke type are capable of conducting a fleeting three-dimensional battle (while providing air, anti-ship and anti-submarine defense) in conditions of a high degree of threat from the enemy.
Compared to the Ticonderoga cruisers, the Arleigh Burke-class destroyers have smaller overall dimensions, better stability parameters and combat survivability, and are also equipped mainly with later and more advanced modifications of electronic, anti-aircraft missile and artillery weapons systems.

When designing and then building Arleigh Burke-class destroyers, the project designers tried to implement the justification put forward by the fleet for this type: to create a ship that has 3/4 of the capabilities of Ticonderoga-class missile cruisers for 2/3 of the price of the latter.

Development history

The development of a new type of URO destroyers, capable of supplementing the 31 Spruence-class destroyers and replacing the destroyers of previous types, began in the late 1970s and, as a result, led to the creation of the appearance of ships of this type and the emergence of a program for their construction. A fundamentally new type of URO destroyers was supposed to be a means to achieve the superiority of the US Navy over the Navy Soviet Union.
Initially, the development of a new destroyer project was proposed in 1980 to the designers of 7 shipbuilding enterprises. Their number was already reduced to 3 companies in 1983: Todd Shipyards, Bath Iron Works, and Ingalls Shipbuilding.

As a result, on April 5, 1985, the Bath Iron Works shipyard won a contract to build the first ship of the Ι series. The contract was signed for $321.9 million, and the total cost of the first-born destroyer, together with weapons, was $1.1 billion (in 1983 prices). The Bath Iron Works shipyard also received a contract to build the 3rd and 4th destroyers in the series, and later sought more and more contracts. The second destroyer of the first series was ordered by a second company, Ingalls Shipbuilding (Todd Shipyards was unable to obtain a contract at all).

Serial construction

After building order first three destroyers (DDG-51 - 53) December 13, 1988 was followed by an order for the construction of 5 more destroyers of the series. This order was followed on February 22, 1990 by a new one for the construction of an additional 5 destroyers, then the shipyards received an order (dated January 16, 1991) for another 4 destroyers.
The last order for 5 destroyers of the first series of the ship was received by the Bath Iron Works and Ingalls Shipbuilding shipyards on April 8, 1992, and the last of the 5 destroyers ordered in 1992, Mahan, was already being completed as a ship of the Flight II series.
Orders for ships of the II series were distributed as follows: January 19 - January 21, 1993 - 4 destroyers (DDG-73 - DDG-76), July 20, 1994 - 3 (DDG-77 - DDG-79), and the last of these 3 destroyers, "Oscar Austin", built according to the Flight IIA project.

Orders for the construction of ships of the IIA series were carried out: January 6, 1995 - 3 units. (DDG-80 - DDG-82), June 20, 1996 - 2 units. (DDG-83 - DDG-84), December 13, 1996 - 4 units. (DDG-85 - DDG-88), March 6, 1998 - 13 units. (DDG-89 - DDG-101), September 13, 2002 - 11 units. (DDG-102 - DDG-112). At the beginning of October 2009, it is planned to build 62 destroyers of this type, of which 56 ships have already been built and 2-3 new ships are put into operation annually.
The last, 56th destroyer of the series, "Jason Dunham", was accepted into the US Navy on October 10, 2009. After the refusal in July 2008 of the serial construction of destroyers of the DDG-1000 type, there are plans to build another 8 - 11 ships of the Arleigh Burke type, so perhaps total number built destroyers "Arleigh Burke" will reach 70 - 73 units.

The construction of new destroyers of the Arleigh Burke class, following USS Michael Murphy (DDG-112), will allow US shipyards to continue the production of destroyers until the start of mass production of cruisers of new types CG (X) and CGN (X) at these enterprises, which expected no earlier than 2015 (except for the small-scale construction of the DDG-1000 destroyers).

Cruiser "Belknap" before the fire

Construction cost

The cost of building the lead destroyer in 1983 prices was $ 1.1 billion. In 2004, the average cost of building one ship of the IIA series was $ 1.1 - 1.25 billion, and the annual cost of servicing one ship (with one repair every two years )= $20 million.
By 2009, due to inflation, the cost of one destroyer of the third sub-series (Flight IIa) increased to $1.4 billion (equivalent to 26.32 billion rubles in purchasing power parity, and the annual maintenance cost to $25 million).

The bulk of the funds from the total cost of building and arming destroyers of the Arleigh Burke type goes directly to the acquisition and installation of weapons systems on destroyers.
So, 6 destroyer hulls ordered by Bath Iron Works for laying down in 2002-2005 cost $3,170,973,112; hull of one destroyer, equal to ≈ $ 500 million, that is, slightly more than a third of the total cost of the ship.
Thus, almost two-thirds of the cost of commissioning a ship is its armament. The most expensive element of the armament of the Arleigh Burke destroyers is the Aegis combat system - its cost is approximately $ 300 million.

The next Arleigh Burke-class destroyer after USS Michael Murphy (DDG-112) (construction is expected to begin in 2009) will cost the US Navy $2.2 billion.
It is assumed that average cost the remaining destroyers of the future series, the construction of which is still only planned, will not exceed $ 1.7 billion.

The increase in costs is due, in addition to inflation, to the installation of new weapons systems on ships under construction.

Hull and superstructure

Arleigh Burke-class destroyers are typical single-hull ships with a hull aspect ratio (along the waterline) = 7.1 of a long-tank design. The hulls of the ships of the series for the first time in many years in American shipbuilding practice began to be made almost entirely of high-strength steel, using only individual units and sections of aluminum, in particular, pipes of gas turbine plants and the main mast.
The experience of the Falklands War, which revealed the weak security of British ships with aluminum hulls, as well as a number of fires on their own ships (in particular, the fire on the Belknap missile cruiser that occurred on November 22, 1975 during a collision cruiser with the aircraft carrier "John F. Kennedy" completely destroyed the superstructure of the cruiser and claimed the lives of 7 people).

Designed for destroyers this project the new hull has full contours in the bow and a small collapse of the surface branches of the bow frames, which differs markedly from its predecessor, the Spruence-class destroyer project.
According to the developers of the Arleigh Burke destroyer project, despite some increase in water resistance, this hull form has the best seaworthiness.
The positive qualities of the Arleigh Burke destroyers are the greater smoothness and smallness of the pitching range, the moderation of flooding and splashing, and the small angles of the ship's heel in circulation. The destroyer's hull is low-sitting.

The hulls of the ships are divided, taking into account rationality, by watertight bulkheads reaching the upper deck into 13 compartments and have a double bottom throughout their length.
Two continuous decks run through the entire ship, not counting the top. In the lower decks there is a through passage that allows the crew to take up combat posts without going to the upper deck for this. The collapse of the sides is more than 8 ° over a significant length of the hull length. The height of tween decks for the US Navy is standard - 2.9 m.

The ships are built according to the modular principle, that is, the ship's hull during construction is formed from pre-assembled modules (blocks). This facilitates and speeds up the construction process.
The complete process of building a ship (from laying to launching) takes from 10 to 17 months, with most ships built in less than 15 months.
A certain delay in construction schedules was observed after Hurricane Katrina, which slowed down the delivery of several destroyers by the Bath Iron Works shipyard in Pascagoula.

The Arleigh Burke-class URO destroyers were the first ships after the Lafayette-class frigates to use stealth technology in their construction. The destroyers of the Arleigh Burke class are the first ships in the US Navy, which, as a result of the creation of superstructure architecture made using stealth technology (with sharp ribs, for greater scattering of radio waves) and the use of coatings that absorb radio emission energy, have significantly reduced the effective scattering area.
In order to reduce the thermal field, the chimneys of destroyers are equipped with special mixing chambers in which exhaust gases are mixed with cold air. The reduction of the thermal field of the ships was achieved by isolating hot sections through the use of an air cooling system for exhaust gases.

The Arleigh Burke-class destroyers are equipped with two 24-foot (7.32 m) semi-rigid inflatable search and rescue boats RHIB or RIB (abbreviated from the English rigid hull inflatable boat), stored on sloops on the starboard side. A commercial crane is used to launch and retrieve RHIB boats.
The equipment of the destroyers "Arly Burke" also includes 15 life rafts, each of which is designed for 25 people.

Series II

The metacentric height of the ships of the 2nd series has been lowered by reducing the weight of the superstructure. On three quarters of the hull length of the destroyers of the 2nd series, the thickness of the metal plating was increased, the fuel efficiency of the ships was improved due to changes in the design of the bow of the vessel.
The propeller design has also been improved to reduce cavitation noise levels. In addition, the living quarters of the destroyers of the series were expanded to accommodate the personnel of the air group, as well as women soldiers.
In order to increase the combat survivability of the Arleigh Burke destroyers, five armored bulkheads were additionally installed in the ship's hull.

Series IΙA

Compared to the Arleigh Burke destroyers of the first series, the hull is lengthened by 1.37 m - up to 155.29 m. The width of the hull remains the same. For the construction of destroyers of the IΙA series, a previously unused technology is used, in which sections are saturated before they are integrated into the main hull modules.
Beginning with USS Shoup (DDG-86), helicopter hangars are made from composite materials to reduce secondary radar field levels. All destroyers of the IIA series are equipped with satellite communications, allowing members of the ship's crew to call home at any time, or use the Internet.
All destroyers, starting with USS McCampbell (DDG-85), have a dedicated laundromat. In addition, a number of other, more minor changes have been made to the design and equipment of the Arleigh Burke-class destroyers of the IIA series.

Engine

A new phenomenon for American shipbuilding was the twin-shaft main power plant installed on the Arleigh Burke destroyers, consisting of 4 General Electric LM2500 gas turbine engines with a heat recovery circuit, giving an additional 25 percent fuel economy.
The main power plant of the ship is mounted on soundproof foundations and shock-absorbing supports. GEM (gas turbine, compressor, pipelines) and soundproof casing are made in the form of a single unit (module).

The propulsion system of the ship allows it to develop a full speed of at least 30 knots in any sea state. The lead destroyer of series I USS Arleigh Burke (DDG-51) on sea trials with a full displacement of the hull developed a 30-knot speed in a 35-foot (10.67 m) wave and a total shaft power of 75,000 hp. With.
On ships of all series there are 3 standby Allison 2500 gas turbine engines (each with a capacity of 2.5 MW), on which the ships are able to move when the power plant fails. The movement of the Arleigh Burke destroyers is provided by 2 five-bladed KaMeWa variable-pitch propellers.

The stock of ship fuel is 1300 tons. The maximum range of destroyers of the Arleigh Burke type of the I series on the operational-economic course (20 knots) reaches 4400 nautical miles (8148.8 km), on ships of the II and IIA series due to increased fuel efficiency ship, achieved through the improvement of the design of the bow of the hull and the placement of additional fuel tanks, the range of the ship was increased to 4890 miles (9056 km).

The range of destroyers at economic speed (18 knots), according to some sources, reaches 6,000 nautical miles (11,112 km). The range of the Arleigh Burke destroyers is estimated to be relatively short, especially since for the previous type of US destroyers, the Spruence-class destroyers, it was 6000 miles at 20 knots and 3300 miles at 30 knots.

The guided missile destroyer USS Arleigh Burke (DDG 51) is the lead destroyer of the Arleigh Burke class built for the US Navy. Named after Admiral Arleigh A. Burke, who fought in the Pacific during World War II.

It was built at the Bath Iron Works in Bath, Maine. The construction contract was concluded on April 02, 1985. The keel laying ceremony took place on 06 December 1988. Launched on September 16, 1989. The ship was sponsored by the wife of Admiral Arly Albert Burke, after whom it was named. The admiral himself attended the ceremony of commissioning the ship into the Atlantic Fleet on July 4, 1991 in Norfolk. Home port naval base in Norfolk, Virginia.

Main characteristics: Displacement total 6630 tons. Length 153.92 meters, width 20.1 meters, draft 9.3 meters. Maximum travel speed 32 knots. Cruising range 4400 nautical miles at 20 knots. The crew of 337 people, including 23 officers.

Engines: 4 General Electric LM2500-30 gas turbine units, with a total capacity of 108,000 hp. mover 2.

Armament:

Tactical strike weapons: 2 Aegis launchers for 29 (bow) and 61 (stern) missile cells, respectively. In various combinations, they can be armed with: Tomahawk CR Tomahawk, RIM-66 SM-2 Standard-2 SAM, RUM-139 ASROC PLUR.

Artillery: 1x1 127 mm. AU Mark 45. Mod. 2/54 cal., 680 rounds.

Anti-aircraft artillery: Two 6-barreled 20 mm. ZAU "Phalanx".

Missile armament: 2x4 Harpoon anti-ship missiles up to 74 RIM-66 SM-2 Standard-2 missiles.

Anti-submarine weapons: PLUR RUM-139 ASROC.

Mine-torpedo armament: 2x3 324 mm. TA Mk. 32 (torpedoes Mk.46 and Mk.50).

Aviation group: 1 SH-60 LAMPS helicopter, no hangar.

In 1993, he participated in Operation Provide Promise.

During the second combat deployment of the ship in 1995, she arrived in the Mediterranean Sea and participated in the air security of Bosnia and Herzegovina.

During his third voyage in 1998, he visited the Mediterranean, Adriatic, Red and Black Seas, as a participant in numerous naval exercises with the participation of the US Navy.

During the fourth long-distance cruise of the ship in 2000-2001, she served in the Mediterranean and Red Seas and in Persian Gulf, ensuring the implementation of UN sanctions against Iraq and conducting joint naval exercises with US partners in the military-strategic sphere.

During her fifth deployment, which lasted from January to June 2003, the destroyer, along with other ships of the carrier strike group formed around the carrier, participated in Operation Enduring Freedom. During this military campaign, the destroyer attacked targets in Iraq using Tomahawk cruise missiles, escorted merchant and auxiliary military vessels, and also fought piracy in the Gulf of Aden. Spent nearly 93 percent of the time at sea during deployment.

In October 2007, he was involved in anti-piracy operations in Somalia.

In 2009, it was deployed to the east coast of Africa.

In August 2010, he arrived at the BAE Systems Ship Repair shipyard in Norfolk, Virginia, to modernize the ship's systems and extend the life of the ship to 40 years.

On September 23, 2014, a Tomahawk missile was launched from the Red Sea at ground targets in Syria.

Left home port on 28 August 2018 for planned deployment. In September, conducting operations in the area of responsibility of the US Sixth Fleet as part of an aircraft carrier strike group. October 25 with a scheduled visit to the port of Haifa, Israel.

In June 2011, the US Navy announced its plans for the future of US Navy destroyers. Promising destroyers of the Zumwalt type turned out to be too expensive for mass production, so it was decided to leave the Arleigh Burk project as the main destroyer of the Navy. In addition, ships of the Orly Burke type will be added to the fleet until the early thirties of this century. During this time, American shipyards will assemble two dozen destroyers. Based on the normal service life of ships in the United States Navy, it can be assumed that the last ship of the Orly Burke class will be withdrawn from the fleet only in the seventies of this century. Apparently, the US Navy command has its own considerations that allow these destroyers to be included in such a distant future.

To ensure an advantage over the Soviet Navy in the mid-70s, American sailors wanted to receive destroyers of a new project. The recently appeared Spruences, although they were modern ships, still did not have great prospects and required, if not replacement, then at least a serious addition. In addition to this, Spruance class destroyers, despite the available weapons, were listed in official documents as ordinary destroyers, and the time and situation required full-fledged URO destroyers (with guided missile). Work on the formation of the appearance of the new ship and the terms of reference for it took several years, and the development competition began only in 1980. It took seven shipbuilding companies at once about three years to create competitive preliminary designs, after which three contestants remained: Bath Iron Works, Ingalls Shipbuilding and Todd Shipyard. The third firm was never able to get the “attention” of the tender committee, which is why the construction of the first two ships of the new project was entrusted to Bath Iron Works and Ingalls Shipbuilding, respectively. The project, as well as its lead ship, was named after Admiral Orly Albert Burke, who commanded various destroyer formations for most of World War II. The contract with the Bath Iron Works for 322 million dollars was awarded in April 85th. However, the total cost of the lead destroyer turned out to be several times higher. Taking into account all electronic equipment, weapons, etc. it cost the Pentagon $1.1 billion.

The construction of the USS Arleigh Burke (DDG-51) began in late 1988, and on Independence Day 1991, she entered service. In the future, two shipyards - Bath Iron Works and Ingalls Shipbuilding - built another two dozen such ships. The first two dozen ships of the new project were made in accordance with the first version of the project, which was named Flight I. However, soon after the start of construction of the lead project of the first series, American shipbuilders began to modernize. As a result, the destroyer USS Mahan, ordered back in 1992, was completed as the first ship of the second series. The construction of the destroyers of the Flight II version had a more modest scale: only seven ships. It is argued that a small second series was originally considered as a transitional link from the first to the third. And so it happened, however, contrary to logic, the new version of the project had not a triple in the index, but the designation IIA. This line turned out to be the most numerous. At the moment, 34 Orly Burke destroyers of the IIA series have been built and their construction continues. The total number of ships according to the old plans was to be 75 units, but for now only 62 are ready. Most likely, those 24 destroyers that will be ordered later will be made according to the next version of the project.

All existing series of ships - I, II and IIA - have only minor differences in design. They are caused by the features of the installed equipment and the features of the operation of helicopters. The rest of the design is similar. "Orly Burke" of all three series are single-hull ships with a long forecastle. It is noteworthy that the vast majority of ship hull parts are made of high-strength steels. The fact is that after the Second World War, American shipbuilders began to actively use aluminum parts in the construction of ships of this class. In engineering terms, this was a good undertaking, but the experience of fighting with the participation of aluminum ships forced a return to steel. Aluminum destroyers "Orly Burke" made only some parts, such as masts. The low-sitting hull has a relatively small flare in the bow and a relatively wide middle section. This hull shape slightly increases water resistance, but improves stability and reduces pitching. On ships of the IIA series, a bow bulb was added to compensate for the deterioration of the flow due to the peculiarities of the hull contours. Watertight bulkheads divide the internal volume of the hull into 13 compartments. It is curious that the lower decks have a layout that allows you to move around the ship without restrictions without leaving the upper deck. This is done so that the crew is not at risk if the enemy uses weapons of mass destruction. In addition to specially planned interiors, the crew is protected from chemical, biological and nuclear weapons by a special ventilation system with multiple filtration of the air taken from outside.

Orly Burke became the first American destroyer, whose hull and superstructure are made using stealth technology. To reduce radar visibility, the outer surface of the ship's superstructure consists of several large, even panels mated at sharp angles, which leads to a noticeable scattering of radio waves. Chimney casings are made in a similar way. In addition, the exhaust of the power plant passes through a special mixing chamber before being released, where it is mixed with atmospheric air and cooled. As a result, ships of the Orly Burke type have almost half the radar and thermal visibility than their Spruence-class predecessors. The use of large parts that reduce visibility, among other things, made it possible to make the design of the ship modular. Thanks to this, 10-15 weeks pass from the laying of the ship to its launch.

The twin-shaft power plant of the Orly Burke destroyers of all series is composed of four LM2500 gas turbine engines manufactured by General Electric. Each engine is equipped with a thermal insulation circuit, which reduces fuel consumption by up to a quarter, and is mounted on shock-absorbing mounts to reduce noise. The entire power plant of the ship is a single module, which, if necessary, can be dismantled entirely. The maximum possible power of the power plant is in the range of 100-105 thousand horsepower. As backup engines, destroyers of all series have three Allison 2500 gas turbine engines. The power of the main and standby engines is transmitted to two shafts that rotate five-blade variable-pitch propellers.

The destroyers of the Orly Burke project are capable of speeds up to 32 knots, but the maximum cruising range is achieved at an economic speed of 20 knots. In this case, the destroyers of the first series can travel up to 4,400 nautical miles, and the ships of the II and IIA series - five thousand miles more. At the same time, some American sources claim that reducing the speed to 18 knots can bring the cruising range up to six thousand miles. However, there are some doubts about this.

The first 28 ships of the Orly Burke type (series I and II) had a crew of 320-350 people: 22-25 officers and 300-330 sailors, warrant officers, etc. The difference in numbers was due to some differences in armament and in the number of helicopters. On the ships of the IIA series, the required number of crew in a number of services was revised and a maintenance group for two helicopters was added. All this led to an increase in the crew to 380 people (32 officers). The Americans especially note the fact that designers and ergonomics specialists participated in the layout of the living quarters of the Orly Burke ships. Thanks to this, with an area of about four square meters per person, it was possible to create all the necessary conditions for normal living.

The weapons of the Orly Burke destroyers include many systems, but its basis is the Aegis control system (read "Aegis"). This multifunctional combat information and control system (CICS) combines a whole set of detection, control and destruction tools. Aegis includes a multifunctional phased array radar, air and surface target detection radar, electronic warfare equipment, communications equipment, etc. In addition, Aegis has a number of subsystems for outputting information, transmitting data to other ships, and direct weapon control systems.

The Orly Burke destroyers are armed with various types of missiles. In the bow and stern of ships of all series there are universal silo launchers Mk 41. On ships of series I and II, the bow and stern launchers have 30 and 60 cells, respectively. On the IIA series, the number of cells increased to 32 and 64. A transport and launch container with a BGM-109 Tomahawk cruise missile, an SM-2 or SM-3 anti-aircraft missile or a block of four containers with RIM-7 Sea Sparrow anti-aircraft missiles can be placed in one cell . The launcher equipment makes it possible to simultaneously prepare 16 missiles of various types for launch and launch them at a rate of one missile per second. In addition to launchers, the Mk 41 has several cranes for loading TPK with missiles. However, the features of the crane equipment and the design of the destroyer do not allow reloading Tomahawk or SM-2/3 missiles from supply ships. Loading such weapons is possible only in the conditions of the base. This disadvantage is compensated by the flexibility of the range of weapons: if the ship is to attack ground targets, then it will receive Tomahawks, if the ship will perform air defense functions, it will be loaded with Sea Sparrow or SM-2 / 3.

The “main caliber” of the destroyers’ artillery armament is the 127-mm Mk 45 mount. At the same time, the Mk 45 Mod was installed on the first 30 copies of the Orly Burke. 2, on the rest - Mk 45 Mod. 4. A mount with bulletproof armor can aim a 127-mm rifled gun in the range from -15° to +65° vertically and in almost all horizontal directions, of course, with the exception of the sector covered by the ship's superstructure. The rate of fire of the Mk 45 with conventional projectiles reaches 20 rounds per minute, and in the case of guided munitions, it drops by half. The maximum firing range of an unguided projectile for the Mk 45 mod. 4 is 35-38 kilometers. When using an ERGM guided active rocket, this figure increases to 115 kilometers. In the artillery cellar of the destroyers "Orly Burke" fits in the ammunition load of 680 shells of various types. It takes about 15-16 hours to load all this number of shells.

Anti-aircraft artillery "Orly Burke" can be equipped with various types of weapons. On ships of the I, II series, as well as on the first few destroyers of the IIA series, six-barreled 20-mm anti-aircraft guns Mk 15 Phalanx CIWS were installed with a rate of fire of up to 3000 rounds per minute. A smaller number of ships were equipped with 25-mm Bushmaster automatic guns, and almost all Orly Burkes carry several (three to six) Browning M2HB heavy machine guns on board. Despite their original purpose, the M2HB and Bushmaster are ineffective for air defense. Therefore, they are used only for training personnel and shelling small targets, like light boats and motor boats.

To destroy more serious surface targets, the destroyers of all three series have two built-in Mk 32 torpedo tubes with a total ammunition load of six torpedoes. It can be Mk 46 or Mk 50. When creating the Orly Burke destroyers, the main emphasis was on missile weapons, so reloading torpedo tubes by the crew after firing all six torpedoes is not provided. In the early versions of the project, engineers considered the possibility of using depth charges on the Orly Burke, but this tactical and technical solution did not even reach Flight I.

One SH-60 helicopter could be based on the deck of ships of the first and second series. Near the landing site there was a kerosene tank and a small "warehouse" with weapons - nine Mk 46 torpedoes. Helicopters intended for deployment on the Orly Burke destroyers are equipped with the LAMPS-3 anti-submarine system integrated into the overall Aegis CICS. Due to the limited volumes of the ships of the first two series, they did not have any means of maintaining or repairing the helicopter, other than those that are on board. Thus, any more or less serious damage led to the fact that the ship was left without rotorcraft "eyes". When creating the version of the IIA project, these shortcomings were taken into account and the shipbuilders made a special helicopter hangar in the aft part of the ship's hull, due to which the destroyer's aviation group doubled. This is what required the introduction of an aircraft maintenance group into the crew. The engineers also increased the arsenal for helicopter weapons: on the Orly Burke IIA series, it fits up to 40 torpedoes, air-to-ground missiles of various types, and even several MANPADS.

Destroyers of the Orly Burke type participated in several military conflicts, starting almost from the very beginning of their service. Iraq in 1996, 1998 and 2003, Yugoslavia in 1999 and several other operations. Due to their large number (there are currently sixty ships in service), these destroyers participate in almost every campaign of the US Navy. However, in Russia these ships are better known thanks to the "mission" of the destroyer USS McFaul (DDG-74), which he carried out in August 2008. Recall that then, a few days after the end of the infamous "War of the Three Eights", this ship brought 55 tons of humanitarian cargo to the Georgian port of Batumi.

In addition to combat successes and an interesting design, the Orly Burke destroyers are in some way record holders in the US Navy. The fact is that with a total displacement of about 8500 tons (series I), 9000 tons (series II) and 9650 (series IIA), the Orly Burke is the most massive American warship with a displacement of more than five thousand tons. This fact suggests that this type of ship is an undoubted success of American shipbuilding. Also in favor of the success of the project is the fact that the Japanese were interested in it at one time. In 1993-95, four destroyers of the Kongo type entered the Japan Self-Defense Forces. In fact, these are the same "Orly Burke", but modified in such a way as to comply with the legal features of the Japanese fleet.

Like any other project, Orly Burke eventually had to be replaced by newer equipment. But, unfortunately for the US Navy, a promising URO destroyer project called Zumwalt turned out to be much more expensive than planned. Thanks to such a failure of the Zamvolta, the Orly Burke will remain in service in the future. When these ships were put into service, it was planned that they would serve for about 35 years. But the lack of the possibility of mass production of Zumwalt destroyers forced the command of the US Navy to start last year the creation of a new version of the project (series III) and outline plans to purchase 24 ships in addition to the 75 already ordered. Together with the assumption regarding the possible duration of the Orly Burke's service until the seventies of the current century, this may help these destroyers set another record. This time it's about durability.

DESTROYERS OF THE TYPE DDG-51 ARLEIGH BURKE

25.06.2019

According to the Associated Press, on June 22, at the General Dynamics Bath Iron Works facility in Bath, Maine, the baptism ceremony for the new Arleigh Burke-class destroyer Daniel Inue (DDG-118) took place.
DDG-118 will be the 68th destroyer class "Arleigh Burke" and the 37th ship of this type, built by General Dynamics Bath Iron Works (GDBIW). The keel laying ceremony for DDG-118 took place on May 14, 2018. The destroyer Daniel Inue is scheduled to be handed over to the US Navy in FY20.
The DDG-118 will be built in the current version of the Fly-2A with the Aegis Baseline 9 weapon control system, which includes the AN / SPY-1 radar, the Mk.99 fire control system, the Mk.41 TLU and the SM-3 Standard SAM, ensuring the defeat of air threats and missile defense.
The latest of the General Dynamics Bath Iron Works built on December 1, 2018, the Arleigh Burke-class URO (DDG-116) URO (DDG-116) squadron destroyer entered the US Navy.
The destroyers (DDG-120) Karl M. Levin, (DDG-122) John Basilon, (DDG-124) Harvey S. Barnum are also under construction at the General Dynamics Bath Iron Works enterprise.
TsAMTO

01.08.2019

The command of the US Navy announced the commissioning ceremony of the destroyer (DDG-117) "Paul Ignacius" of the class "Arleigh Burke" held on July 27 in Fort Lauderdale, Florida.
DDG-117 became the 67th Arleigh Burke-class (DDG-51) and 31st destroyer of the series built by Huntington Ingalls Industries (HII). The cutting of the first steel for the construction of DDG-117 began on September 30, 2014, and the keel authentication ceremony took place on September 30, 2015. The ship was launched on November 12, 2016. The christening ceremony took place on April 8, 2017, and on February 22, 2019 (DDG-117) "Paul Ignacius" was transferred to the US Navy. The ship's home port will be Mayport (Florida).
The DDG-117 is built in the Fly-2A (Flight IIA) configuration with the Aegis Baseline 9 weapon control system, which includes the AN / SPY-1 radar, the Mk.99 fire control system, the Mk.41 TLU and the SM-3 SAM "Standard", ensuring the destruction of aircraft of various types and ballistic missiles.
To date, four more ships of the series are under construction at the HII facility in Pascagoula: Delbert D. Black (DDG-119), Frank E. Petersen Jr. (DDG-121), Lena Sutcliff Higby (DDG- 123) and "Jack Lucas" (DDG-125).
On September 28, 2018, the US Navy command signed a long-term contract with Ingalls Shipbuilding worth $ 5.104 billion for the construction of 6 destroyers of the Arleigh Burke class (DDG-51) of the Fly-3 ″ (Flight III) version with advanced anti-aircraft capabilities and missile defense.
TsAMTO

21.09.2019

BAE Systems San Diego Ship Repair has been awarded two contracts totaling over $170 million to repair and upgrade two destroyers Arleigh type Burke of the US Navy, based in San Diego, reports navyrecognition.com on September 19th.
The shipyard received $86.1 million to repair the destroyer USS Decatur (DDG 73). In 2018, the destroyer was on a deployment to the South China Sea during which it was attacked by a Chinese destroyer that passed within 45 yards of Decatur's bow. The contract is expected to be completed by October 2020. The destroyer returned to Naval Base San Diego in April 2019 after being deployed to the US 7th and 5th Fleets.
USS Decatur (DDG-73), named after former naval officer Stephen Decatur Jr., is the 23rd Arleigh Burke-class destroyer. USS Decatur was the 13th ship of the class built at the Bath Iron Works in Bath, Maine with construction beginning on 11 January 1996. The destroyer was launched on November 10, 1996, and on August 29, 1998 the ship was commissioned.
Military parity

DESTROYERS TYPE DDG-51 ARLEIGH BURKE

Destroyers of the Arleigh Burke class (Arleigh Burke class destroyers) - a type of URO destroyers (with guided missile weapons) of the third generation. Destroyers have been built by order of the US Navy since 1988, and the construction of ships of this type continues.
The development of a new type of URO destroyers, capable of supplementing the 31 Spruence-class destroyers and replacing the destroyers of previous types, began in the late 1970s and, as a result, led to the creation of the appearance of ships of this type and the emergence of a program for their construction. A fundamentally new type of URO destroyers was supposed to be a means to achieve the superiority of the US Navy over the Navy of the Soviet Union. Initially, the development of a new destroyer project was proposed in 1980 to the designers of seven shipbuilding enterprises. Their number was already reduced to three companies in 1983: Todd Shipyards, Bath Iron Works, and Ingalls Shipbuilding.
As a result, on April 5, 1985, the Bath Iron Works shipyard won a contract to build the first ship of the Ι series. The contract was signed for $321.9 million, and the total cost of the first-born destroyer, together with weapons, was $1.1 billion (in 1983 prices). The Bath Iron Works shipyard also received a contract to build the 3rd and 4th destroyers in the series, and later sought more and more contracts. The second destroyer of the first series was ordered by a second company, Ingalls Shipbuilding (Todd Shipyards was unable to secure a contract).
The construction of the USS Arleigh Burke (DDG-51) began in late 1988, and on Independence Day 1991, she entered service. In the future, two shipyards - Bath Iron Works and Ingalls Shipbuilding - built another two dozen such ships. The first two dozen ships of the new project were made in accordance with the first version of the project, which was named Flight I. However, soon after the start of construction of the lead project of the first series, American shipbuilders began to modernize.
As a result, the destroyer USS Mahan, ordered back in 1992, was completed as the first ship of the second series. The construction of the destroyers of the Flight II version had a more modest scale: only seven ships. It is argued that a small second series was originally considered as a transitional link from the first to the third. And so it happened, however, contrary to logic, the new version of the project had not a triple in the index, but the designation IIA. This line turned out to be the most numerous.
At the moment, 34 Arleigh Burke destroyers of the IIA series have been built and their construction continues.
All existing series of ships - I, II and IIA - have only minor differences in design. They are caused by the features of the installed equipment and the features of the operation of helicopters. The rest of the design is similar.
Each ship is equipped with 29 bow and 61 stern vertical launchers, which house four types of missiles. Anti-aircraft guided missiles SM-2 "Standard" capable of destroying enemy targets located at a distance of 166 km. Anti-submarine torpedo missiles RUM-139 "VL-Asroc" with an effective firing distance of over 16 km. Anti-ship missiles AGM-84 "Harpoon", threatening even from beyond the horizon, and finally, the main caliber cruise missiles BGM-109 "Tomahawk".
In addition to the launchers, the Arleigh Burke-class destroyers are equipped with 127 mm artillery mount with an ammunition load of 680 rounds, two six-barreled 20 mm Phalanx anti-aircraft artillery mounts and four Browning machine guns with a caliber of 12.7 mm. Except deck armament two SH-60B "Seahawk" helicopters with sets of anti-ship and anti-submarine weapons can be placed on board, expanding the range of the destroyer, allowing you to detect and attack enemy targets tens of kilometers away. With such an arsenal on board, these warships can not only protect the squadron, but also deliver high-precision strikes against enemy ships. In other words, these warships are not just a tactical weapon, but also an operational-tactical one, that is, to hit targets in the depths of the enemy.
As of May 2010, the Arleigh Burke destroyer is the largest-scale type of surface warship with a total displacement of more than 5,000 tons in the entire post-war history of the fleet. Given the rather low pace of construction of destroyers in other states, in the coming years, not a single state in the world will be able to beat this kind of record.
In addition to the US Navy, four ships of the Arleigh Burke type, albeit with a slightly modified design and built according to civilian standards (destroyers of the Congo type), are in service with the Japanese Naval Self-Defense Forces. For 2000, it was planned to introduce three more ships into the Japanese Navy by 2010, upgraded to the level of the IIA series, but at present, the construction of these ships has been abandoned in favor of more advanced Atago-class destroyers.
In March 2012, the US Navy awarded General Dynamics Bath Iron Works a $663 million contract to build the next Arleigh Burke-class destroyer. The construction of the destroyer under the number DDG-116 is provided for by an option to the Navy contract concluded in the fall of 2011. DDG-116 will be the 66th ship of the Arleigh Burke project.
In 2012, researchers from the U.S. Naval Surface Weapons Center at Carderock completed a two-week cycle of hydrodynamic tests of the GAS bulbous fairings intended for installation on destroyers of the DDG51 Arleigh Burke type, the official website of the American Navy reported. The protruding fairing of the hydroacoustic station in the form of a tear is planned to be installed in the area of the vessel's waterline in order to reduce the wave resistance of the hull and, consequently, fuel consumption. At the preliminary stage, scientists developed more than 20 variants of fairings, of which, based on the results of the tests, 4 were selected to continue work to improve their shape and size.
In accordance with the decision made public in September 2009, the US missile defense architecture in Europe will be created in four stages. At the first one, in the period up to 2011, ships equipped with Aegis systems and RIM-161 Standard Missile 3 (SM-3) interceptor missiles were deployed in the Mediterranean Sea, and a missile defense radar was deployed in Turkey. On the second - by 2015 - it is planned to transfer mobile batteries with SM-3 missiles to the territory of Romania. Further - by 2018 - they are supposed to be deployed in Poland. And by 2020, it is planned to replace these missiles with more advanced ones, capable of protecting the entire territory of NATO member countries not only from intermediate and shorter-range missiles, but also from intercontinental ballistic missiles.
In June 2013, the US Navy command signed contracts with shipbuilding enterprises General Dynamics and Hungtington Ingalls for the construction of nine new Arleigh Burke-class destroyers. The deal amounted to 6.1 billion dollars. All ordered ships must be delivered to the customer by the end of 2017. As expected, the first two ships of the order ─ DDG-117 and DDG-118 ─ will receive the names "Paul Ignatius" and "Daniel Inoui". The names of the other destroyers have not yet been determined. All destroyers ordered by the US Navy will be built according to a modernized project and will receive a number of significant improvements. In particular, instead of obsolete SPY-1D radars, new ones will be installed on ships. radar stations air and missile defense AMDR. Since the power consumption of the new radars is much higher than that of the SPY-1D, the Arleigh Burke-class destroyers will receive improved power supply systems.
On September 12, 2013, Huntington Ingalls Industries began building the next Aegis missile destroyer for the US Navy, the Ralph Johnson (DDG-114). The ship will be the 30th Arleigh Burke-class (DDG-51) destroyer built by Ingalls Shipbuilding.
In October 2013, Raytheon announced a $385.74 million contract for the design, development, integration, testing and delivery of AMDR-S (Air and Missile Defense Radar S-Band Radar) S-band air defense / missile defense radars. and radar control kit (RSC). AMDR is a next-generation air defense/missile defense radar designed to equip the Arleigh Burke-class Fly III (DDG-51) destroyers starting in 2016. The AMDR system will be a complex of S-band radar (2-4 GHz), X-band radar and radar control unit (RSC).
The United States resumed the Arleigh Burke-class destroyer construction program, laying down another such ship on November 4, 2013. The destroyer will be named "John Finn"; it is being built at the Hungtington Ingalls Industries shipyard in Pascagoula, Mississippi. The destroyer is being built as part of the continued "Series IIA"; it will be the 29th ship of this project and the 63rd of the Arleigh Burke class.
In January 2014, Lockheed Martin was awarded another $574 million contract to manufacture Aegis missile defense system components for seven Arleigh Burke-class destroyers (DDG 117-123) and assemble one coastal complex Aegis Ashore.
The first of the American warships that will form the naval component of the US missile defense system (ABM) in Europe, the destroyer URO Donald Cook arrived at the Spanish naval base of Rota in February 2014. Donald Cook is equipped with the Aegis weapons control system, which, when interacting with other ground, air or space systems, allows you to detect and destroy ballistic missiles enemy.
Second of four American destroyers ABM, designed to support the "anti-missile architecture" of Europe, left the United States on June 3, 2014. The destroyer USS Ross (DDG 71) of the Arleigh Burke class left the Norfolk Naval Base (Virginia) and will join the sister ship USS Donald Cook (DDG 75).
In March 2014, the U.S. Naval Shipbuilding and Armaments Command signed two contracts on March 14 to build the FY14 Arleigh Burke-class DDG-51 destroyers for a total value of $1.244 billion. An agreement worth $642.58 million has been signed with General Dynamics But Iron Works (BIW) for the construction of one DDG-51 class destroyer under a long-term contract signed in June 2013 (calculated for FY 2013-2017). Construction will take place in Brunswick, Maine. The agreement also includes $79.4 million to finance the purchase of materials for subsequent ships in the series, which will be ordered in 2016-2017. Initially, the DDG-51 class destroyer program was expected to be completed in 2012 after the transfer of the 62nd ship of the DDG-112 series "Michael P. Murphy" to the US Navy. However, due to the increased cost of the DDG-1000 Zumwalt class destroyers, the US Navy decided to continue ordering the Arleigh Burke class ships.
In April 2014, BAE Systems received a contract from the US Navy to carry out work on the technical re-equipment and modernization of nine destroyers assigned to the port of Pearl Harbor on the island of Oahu (Hawaii). The contract is for 5 years. Repair work will be carried out on the following warships: Arleigh Burke guided missile destroyers USS Chafee (DDG-90), USS John Paul Jones (DDG-53), USS Chung-Hoon (DDG-93) , USS Hopper (DDG-70), USS Michael Murphy (DDG-112), USS O'Kane (DDG-77), USS Halsey (DDG-97), USS Milius (DDG -69) and "USS Preble" (DDG-88). This contract is a continuation of the work on the modernization of destroyers of this type, which was carried out by BAE Systems under the previous 7-year contract.

On September 23, 2014, the keel of the next Arleigh Burke-class USS Ralph Johnson (DDG 114) missile destroyer was laid at the Huntington Ingalls Industries (HII) shipyard. This is the 30th ship of this type built / under construction at the Pascagoula shipyard (Mississippi). It is reported that the construction of the destroyer blocks is 26% completed, the construction will last until 2017.
At the Huntington Ingalls Industries shipyard in Pascagoula, Mississippi, on September 30, a ceremony was held to cut the first steel for the destroyer Paul Ignatius (DDG-117) of the Arleigh Burke class. It is planned that "Paul Ignatius" will be transferred to the US Navy in the first half of 2017. This ship will be the 30th Arleigh Burke-class destroyer built by Ingalls Shipbuilding. The destroyer "Paul Ignatius" will be built in the current version of the Fly-2A and will be a total of 67 ships of the class "Arleigh Burke" (DDG-51).

It is expected that ships of this type will serve in the US Navy until at least 2070.

SERIES:
FLIGHT I
USS Arleigh Burke (DDG 51), Norfolk, VA
USS Barry (DDG 52), Norfolk, VA
USS John Paul Jones (DDG 53), San Diego, CA
USS Curtis Wilbur (DDG 54), Yokosuka, Japan
USS Stout (DDG 55), Norfolk, VA
USS John S McCain (DDG 56), Yokosuka, Japan
USS Mitscher (DDG 57), Norfolk, VA
USS Laboon (DDG 58), Norfolk, VA
USS Russell (DDG 59), Pearl Harbor, HI
USS Paul Hamilton (DDG 60), Pearl Harbor, HI
USS Ramage (DDG 61), Norfolk, VA
USS Fitzgerald (DDG 62), Yokosuka, Japan
USS Stethem (DDG 63), Yokosuka, Japan
USS Carney (DDG 64), Mayport, FL
USS Benfold (DDG 65), San Diego, CA
USS Gonzalez (DDG 66), Norfolk, VA
USS Cole (DDG 67), Norfolk, VA
USS The Sullivans (DDG 68), Mayport, FL
USS Milius (DDG 69), San Diego, CA
USS Hopper (DDG 70), Pearl Harbor, HI
USS Ross (DDG 71), Norfolk, VA

FLIGHT II
USS Mahan (DDG 72), Norfolk, VA
USS Decatur (DDG 73), San Diego, CA
USS McFaul (DDG 74), Norfolk, VA
USS Donald Cook (DDG 75), Norfolk, VA
USS Higgins (DDG 76), San Diego, CA
USS O'kane (DDG 77), Pearl Harbor, HI
USS Porter (DDG 78), Norfolk, VA

FLIGHT IIA
USS Oscar Austin (DDG 79), Norfolk, VA
USS Roosevelt (DDG 80), Mayport, FL
USS Winston S Churchill (DDG 81), Norfolk, VA
USS Lassen (DDG 82), Yokosuka, Japan
USS Howard (DDG 83), San Diego, CA
USS Bulkeley (DDG 84), Norfolk, VA
USS McCampbell (DDG 85), Yokosuka, Japan
USS Shoup (DDG 86), Everett, WA
USS Mason (DDG 87), Norfolk, VA
USS Preble (DDG 88), San Diego, CA
USS Mustin (DDG 89), Yokosuka, Japan
USS Chafee (DDG 90), Pearl Harbor, HI
USS Pinckney (DDG 91), San Diego, CA
USS Momsen (DDG 92), Everett, WA
USS Chung-Hoon (DDG 93), Pearl Harbor, HI
USS Nitze (DDG 94), Norfolk, VA
USS James E Williams (DDG 95), Norfolk, VA
USS Bainbridge (DDG 96), Norfolk, VA
USS Halsey (DDG 97), San Diego, CA
USS Forrest Sherman (DDG 98), Norfolk, VA
USS Farragut (DDG 99), Mayport, FL
USS Kidd (DDG 100), San Diego, CA
USS Gridley (DDG 101), San Diego, CA
USS Sampson (DDG 102), San Diego, CA
USS Truxtun (DDG 103), Norfolk, VA
USS Sterett (DDG 104), San Diego, CA
USS Dewey (DDG 105), No homeport
USS Stockdale (DDG 106), San Diego, CA
USS Gravely (DDG 107), Norfolk, VA
USS Wayne E. Meyer (DDG 108), San Diego, CA
USS Jason Dunham (DDG 109), Norfolk, VA
USS William P. Lawrence (DDG 110), San Diego, CA
USS Spruance (DDG 111), San Diego, CA
USS Michael Murphy (DDG 112), Pearl Harbor, HI
PCU John Finn (DDG 113), Under construction
PCU Ralph Johnson (DDG 114), Under construction
PCU Rafael Peralta (DDG 115), Under construction
PCU Thomas Hudner (DDG 116), Under construction
Paul Ignatius DDG-117, Under construction
Daniel Inouye DDG-118, Under construction
Delbert D. Black DDG-119, Under construction
Carl M. Levin DDG-120, Under construction
Frank E. Petersen Jr. DDG-121, Under construction
John Basilone DDG-122, Under construction
Lenah H. Sutcliffe Higbee DDG-123, Under construction
Harvey C. Barnum Jr. DDG-124, Under construction
Jack H. Lucas DDG-125, Under construction
Louis H. Wilson Jr. DDG-126, Under construction

CHARACTERISTICS

Displacement (tons): 8373
Length (m): 153.8
Width (m): 20.4
Speed (knots): 30
Range (miles): 4400
Draft (m): 6.3
Crew: 346 people.

WEAPONS

ZRS: Aegis
UVP: MK41 - 90 cells for missiles and missiles
Gun: 1 x 127 mm Mk45
Torpedo tubes: 6,318 mm
Anti-ship complexes: 8 Harpoon
Anti-aircraft installations: 2 Volcano MK.15
Electronic weapons
GAS: 1 AN/SQS-53C(V)
Radar: 1 AN/SPY-1D 3-D
1 AN/SPS-67(V)3
1 AN/SPS-64(V)9