Perform parsing of the sentence river. Syntactic analysis of a complex sentence

Not all students are easily given complete parsing suggestions. We will show you the correct sequence of actions that will make it easier to cope with such a task.

Step 1: Read the sentence carefully and determine the purpose of the statement.

According to the purpose of the statement, the proposals are divided into:

  • narrative - "Beauty will save the world"(F. Dostoevsky);
  • interrogative - "Rus, where are you going?"(N. Gogol);
  • incentive - “My friend, let us dedicate our souls to the homeland with wonderful impulses!”(A. Pushkin); “A testament to writers: no need to invent intrigues and plots. Use the stories that life itself provides "(F. Dostoevsky).

Declarative sentences contain a message about something and are characterized by a calm narrative intonation. The content and structure of such proposals can be very diverse.

The purpose of interrogative sentences is to get an answer from the interlocutor to the question posed in the sentence. In some cases, when the question is rhetorical (i.e., does not require an answer), the purpose of such a sentence is different - the pathetic expression of some thought, idea, expression of the speaker's attitude to something, etc.

The purpose of uttering an incentive sentence is to motivate the addressee of the message to take some action. An incentive can express a direct order, advice, request, warning, call to action, etc. The differences between some of these options are often expressed not by the structure of the sentence itself, but by the intonation of the speaker.

Step 2: Determine the intonation and emotional tone of the sentence.

At this stage of parsing a sentence, look for the punctuation mark at the end of the sentence. According to this parameter, the proposals are divided into:

  • exclamatory - “Well, what a neck! What eyes!”(I. Krylov);
  • non-exclamatory - "Thought flies, but words go step by step"(A. Green).

Step 3: Find in the offer grammar basics.

The number of grammatical stems in a sentence determines what that sentence is:

  • simple sentence - "Wine turns a person into a beast and a beast, brings him to a frenzy"(F. Dostoevsky);
  • difficult sentence - “It seems to me that people do not understand how much squalor and misfortune in their lives arises from laziness”(Ch. Aitmatov).

Further parsing complex sentence and parsing simple sentence go different ways.

First, let's look at the parsing of a simple sentence with examples.

Stage 4 for a simple sentence: Find the main members and characterize the proposal.

A simple sentence, depending on the presence of a complete set of main members of the proposal or the absence of any of them, can be:

  • one-piece - "It is not difficult to despise the court of people, it is impossible to despise one's own court"(A. Pushkin), there is no subject; "Autumn. Fairy-tale palace, open to everyone for review. Clearings of forest roads, looking into the lakes»(B. Pasternak), there is no predicate;
  • two-part - “A very bad sign is the loss of the ability to understand humor, allegories, jokes”(F. Dostoevsky).

Specify which main member present in a single sentence. Depending on this, one-component sentences are nominal (there is a subject: nominal) and verbal (there is a predicate: definitely personal, indefinitely personal, generalized personal, impersonal).

Stage 5 for a simple sentence: See if there are secondary members in the sentence.

By the presence / absence of additions, definitions and circumstances, a simple sentence can be:

  • common - “My goal was to visit Old Street”(I. Bunin);
  • uncommon - "The attack is over. Sadness in disgrace"(S. Yesenin).

Stage 6 for a simple sentence: Determine full offer or incomplete.

Whether a sentence is complete or incomplete depends on whether its structure includes all the members of the sentence that are needed for a complete, meaningful statement. In incomplete, any of the main or minor members is missing. And the meaning of the statement is determined by the context or previous sentences.

  • complete offer - "Prishvin's words bloom, sparkle"(K. Paustovsky);
  • incomplete sentence - "What is your name? - Me Anochka "(K. Fedin).

When parsing a sentence for an incomplete one, indicate which members of the sentence are missing.

Stage 7 for a simple sentence: Determine if the sentence is complicated or not complicated.

A simple sentence may or may not be complicated. introductory words and appeals, homogeneous or isolated members of the sentence, direct speech. Examples of simple compound sentences:

  • "Ostap Bender, as a strategist, was great"(I. Ilf, E. Petrov);
  • “He, the commissar, had to become on a par with Sarychev, if not by personal charm, not by past military merits, not by military talent, then by everything else: integrity, firmness, knowledge of the matter, and finally, courage in battle”(K. Simonov).

Stage 8 for a simple sentence

First, the subject and predicate are designated, then the secondary ones in the subject and the secondary ones in the predicate.

Stage 9 for a simple sentence

At the same time, indicate the grammatical basis, if the sentence is complicated, indicate the complication.

Look at a sample sentence parsing:

  • Oral analysis: narrative sentence, non-exclamatory, simple, two-part, grammatical basis: the porter trampled, moved, did not, stopped, widespread, full, complicated by homogeneous predicates, isolated definition (participle turnover), separate circumstance(participial turnover).
  • Written review: narration, unexcited, simple, double-sided, g / o the doorman trampled, moved was, did not, stopped, distributed, complicated. homogeneous skaz., sep. def. (participle turnover), esp. obs-vom (participle turnover). Now let's look at the syntactic analysis of a complex sentence with examples.

Stage 4 for a complex sentence: Determine how the connection exists between the parts of a complex sentence.

Depending on the presence or absence of unions, the connection can be:

  • allied - "He who strives for self-improvement will never believe that this self-improvement has a limit"(L. Tolstoy);
  • unionless - “At the moment when the moon, so huge and pure, rose above the crest of that dark mountain, the stars that were in the sky opened their eyes at once”(Ch. Aitmatov).

Stage 5 for a complex sentence: Find out what links the parts of a complex sentence together:

  • intonation;
  • coordinating conjunctions;
  • subordinating unions.

Stage 6 for a complex sentence: Based on the relationship between the parts of the sentence and the means by which this relationship is expressed, classify the sentence.

Classification of complex sentences:

  • compound sentence (CSP) - “ My father had a strange influence on me, and our relationship was strange"(I. Turgenev);
  • complex sentence (CSP) - “She did not take her eyes off the road that leads through the grove” (I. Goncharov);
  • complex unionless proposal(BSP) - "I know: in your heart there is both pride and direct honor" (A. Pushkin);
  • offer with different types connections - “People are divided into two categories: those who first think, and then speak and, accordingly, do, and those who first act, and then think” (L. Tolstoy).

The connection between the parts of an asyndetic complex sentence can be expressed different signs punctuation: comma, colon, dash, semicolon.

Stage 7 for a complex sentence: Describe the links between the parts of the sentence.

Define:

  • what does the adjective refer to;
  • whereby the subordinate part is attached to the main part;
  • what question is it answering.

Stage 8 for a complex sentence: If there are several subordinate parts, describe the relationship between them:

  • consistent - "I heard Gaidar cleaning the kettle with sand and scolding him for the handle falling off" (K. Paustovsky);
  • parallel - "It is necessary to accurately take into account the environment in which a poetic work develops so that a word alien to this environment does not accidentally fall" (V. Mayakovsky);
  • homogeneous - “It was difficult to understand whether there was a fire somewhere, or the moon was about to rise” (A. Chekhov)

Stage 9 for a complex sentence: Underline all the members of the sentence and indicate what parts of speech they are expressed.

Stage 10 for a complex sentence: Now parse each part of a complex sentence as a simple one, see the diagram above.

Stage 11 for a complex sentence: Make a proposal outline.

In this case, indicate the means of communication, the type of accessory part. Look at the example of parsing a complex sentence:

Conclusion

The scheme of syntactic parsing of the sentence, proposed by us, will help to correctly characterize the sentence in all significant parameters. Use this step-by-step guide regularly at school and at home to better remember the sequence of reasoning when analyzing sentences.

Examples of syntactic analysis of sentences of simple and complex structure will help to correctly characterize sentences in oral and written form. With our instructions, a difficult task will become clearer and easier, help you learn the material and consolidate it in practice.

Write a comment if this scheme was useful to you. And if it turned out to be useful, do not forget to tell your friends and classmates about it.

blog.site, with full or partial copying of the material, a link to the source is required.

Not all students are easily given a complete syntactic analysis of a sentence. We will show you the correct sequence of actions that will make it easier to cope with such a task.

Step 1: Read the sentence carefully and determine the purpose of the statement.

According to the purpose of the statement, the proposals are divided into:

  • narrative - "Beauty will save the world"(F. Dostoevsky);
  • interrogative - "Rus, where are you going?"(N. Gogol);
  • incentive - “My friend, let us dedicate our souls to the homeland with wonderful impulses!”(A. Pushkin); “A testament to writers: no need to invent intrigues and plots. Use the stories that life itself provides "(F. Dostoevsky).

Declarative sentences contain a message about something and are characterized by a calm narrative intonation. The content and structure of such proposals can be very diverse.

The purpose of interrogative sentences is to get an answer from the interlocutor to the question posed in the sentence. In some cases, when the question is rhetorical (i.e., does not require an answer), the purpose of such a sentence is different - the pathetic expression of some thought, idea, expression of the speaker's attitude to something, etc.

The purpose of uttering an incentive sentence is to motivate the addressee of the message to take some action. An incentive can express a direct order, advice, request, warning, call to action, etc. The differences between some of these options are often expressed not by the structure of the sentence itself, but by the intonation of the speaker.

Step 2: Determine the intonation and emotional tone of the sentence.

At this stage of parsing a sentence, look for the punctuation mark at the end of the sentence. According to this parameter, the proposals are divided into:

  • exclamatory - “Well, what a neck! What eyes!”(I. Krylov);
  • non-exclamatory - "Thought flies, but words go step by step"(A. Green).

Step 3: Find the grammatical bases in the sentence.

The number of grammatical stems in a sentence determines what that sentence is:

  • simple sentence - "Wine turns a person into a beast and a beast, brings him to a frenzy"(F. Dostoevsky);
  • difficult sentence - “It seems to me that people do not understand how much squalor and misfortune in their lives arises from laziness”(Ch. Aitmatov).

In the future, the syntactic analysis of a complex sentence and the syntactic analysis of a simple sentence follow different paths.

First, let's look at the parsing of a simple sentence with examples.

Stage 4 for a simple sentence: Find the main members and characterize the proposal.

A simple sentence, depending on the presence of a complete set of main members of the proposal or the absence of any of them, can be:

  • one-piece - "It is not difficult to despise the court of people, it is impossible to despise one's own court"(A. Pushkin), there is no subject; "Autumn. Fairy-tale palace, open to everyone for review. Clearings of forest roads, looking into the lakes»(B. Pasternak), there is no predicate;
  • two-part - “A very bad sign is the loss of the ability to understand humor, allegories, jokes”(F. Dostoevsky).

Indicate which main member is present in a one-part sentence. Depending on this, one-component sentences are nominal (there is a subject: nominal) and verbal (there is a predicate: definitely personal, indefinitely personal, generalized personal, impersonal).

Stage 5 for a simple sentence: See if there are secondary members in the sentence.

By the presence / absence of additions, definitions and circumstances, a simple sentence can be:

  • common - “My goal was to visit Old Street”(I. Bunin);
  • uncommon - "The attack is over. Sadness in disgrace"(S. Yesenin).

Stage 6 for a simple sentence: Decide if the sentence is complete or incomplete.

Whether a sentence is complete or incomplete depends on whether its structure includes all the members of the sentence that are needed for a complete, meaningful statement. In incomplete, any of the main or minor members is missing. And the meaning of the statement is determined by the context or previous sentences.

  • complete offer - "Prishvin's words bloom, sparkle"(K. Paustovsky);
  • incomplete sentence - "What is your name? - Me Anochka "(K. Fedin).

When parsing a sentence for an incomplete one, indicate which members of the sentence are missing.

Stage 7 for a simple sentence: Determine if the sentence is complicated or not complicated.

A simple sentence can be complicated or not complicated by introductory words and addresses, homogeneous or isolated members of the sentence, direct speech. Examples of simple compound sentences:

  • "Ostap Bender, as a strategist, was great"(I. Ilf, E. Petrov);
  • “He, the commissar, had to become on a par with Sarychev, if not by personal charm, not by past military merits, not by military talent, then by everything else: integrity, firmness, knowledge of the matter, and finally, courage in battle”(K. Simonov).

Stage 8 for a simple sentence

First, the subject and predicate are designated, then the secondary ones in the subject and the secondary ones in the predicate.

Stage 9 for a simple sentence

At the same time, indicate the grammatical basis, if the sentence is complicated, indicate the complication.

Look at a sample sentence parsing:

  • Oral analysis: narrative sentence, non-exclamatory, simple, two-part, grammatical basis: the porter trampled, moved, did not, stopped, widespread, complete, complicated by homogeneous predicates, a separate definition (participle turnover), a separate circumstance (participle turnover).
  • Written review: narration, unexcited, simple, double-sided, g / o the doorman trampled, moved was, did not, stopped, distributed, complicated. homogeneous skaz., sep. def. (participle turnover), esp. obs-vom (participle turnover). Now let's look at the syntactic analysis of a complex sentence with examples.

Stage 4 for a complex sentence: Determine how the connection exists between the parts of a complex sentence.

Depending on the presence or absence of unions, the connection can be:

  • allied - "He who strives for self-improvement will never believe that this self-improvement has a limit"(L. Tolstoy);
  • unionless - “At the moment when the moon, so huge and pure, rose above the crest of that dark mountain, the stars that were in the sky opened their eyes at once”(Ch. Aitmatov).

Stage 5 for a complex sentence: Find out what links the parts of a complex sentence together:

  • intonation;
  • coordinating conjunctions;
  • subordinating unions.

Stage 6 for a complex sentence: Based on the relationship between the parts of the sentence and the means by which this relationship is expressed, classify the sentence.

Classification of complex sentences:

  • compound sentence (CSP) - “ My father had a strange influence on me, and our relationship was strange"(I. Turgenev);
  • complex sentence (CSP) - “She did not take her eyes off the road that leads through the grove” (I. Goncharov);
  • complex non-union sentence (BSP) - “I know: in your heart there is both pride and direct honor” (A. Pushkin);
  • a sentence with different types of connection - “People are divided into two categories: those who first think, and then speak and, accordingly, do, and those who first act, and then think” (L. Tolstoy).

The connection between the parts of an asyndetic complex sentence can be expressed by different punctuation marks: comma, colon, dash, semicolon.

Stage 7 for a complex sentence: Describe the links between the parts of the sentence.

Define:

  • what does the adjective refer to;
  • whereby the subordinate part is attached to the main part;
  • what question is it answering.

Stage 8 for a complex sentence: If there are several subordinate parts, describe the relationship between them:

  • consistent - "I heard Gaidar cleaning the kettle with sand and scolding him for the handle falling off" (K. Paustovsky);
  • parallel - "It is necessary to accurately take into account the environment in which a poetic work develops so that a word alien to this environment does not accidentally fall" (V. Mayakovsky);
  • homogeneous - “It was difficult to understand whether there was a fire somewhere, or the moon was about to rise” (A. Chekhov)

Stage 9 for a complex sentence: Underline all the members of the sentence and indicate what parts of speech they are expressed.

Stage 10 for a complex sentence: Now parse each part of a complex sentence as a simple one, see the diagram above.

Stage 11 for a complex sentence: Make a proposal outline.

In this case, indicate the means of communication, the type of accessory part. Look at the example of parsing a complex sentence:

Conclusion

The scheme of syntactic parsing of the sentence, proposed by us, will help to correctly characterize the sentence in all significant parameters. Use this step-by-step guide regularly at school and at home to better remember the sequence of reasoning when analyzing sentences.

Examples of syntactic analysis of sentences of simple and complex structure will help to correctly characterize sentences in oral and written form. With our instructions, a difficult task will become clearer and easier, help you learn the material and consolidate it in practice.

Write a comment if this scheme was useful to you. And if it turned out to be useful, do not forget to tell your friends and classmates about it.

site, with full or partial copying of the material, a link to the source is required.

Syntactic parsing of a sentence is a detailed analysis of a sentence, divided into several components. Thanks to this method students will test their knowledge of the syntax of the Russian language. AT educational institutions parsing is final chapter in the syntax section, since it provides an opportunity to comprehensively use previously acquired knowledge.

How to parse a proposal

Parsing is a logical and step-by-step process. Used at school two types of parsing: oral and written. Their difference lies in the fact that in writing - parts of speech are marked schematically, and in oral they are pronounced.

Step by step analysis:

  1. Define, what is the purpose carries an offer. If the author is trying to tell something - narrative, ask - interrogative, induce to some kind of action incentive.
  2. Emotional color on the letter is expressed by the presence of an exclamation mark. If you see an exclamation point at the end, then the sentence is an exclamation point. If it is not there, it is non-exclamatory.
  3. count the number grammatical foundations. One grammatical basis is simple, several are complex.
  4. Describe the connection between the parts of the sentence is allied or non-union.
  5. Determine how the parts communicate with each other: unions (subordinating or composing) or intonation (punctuation marks).
  6. Depending on unions characterize the type: compound, compound or non-union.
  7. Analyze each part on the following parameters: the presence of main and secondary members, the search for complicating factors (homogeneous members, introductory constructions, interjections, appeals).
  8. Chart sentences, graphically highlighting the components.

Note! The syntactic analysis of a complex sentence differs from the simple one only in the number of grammatical bases. Because of this, some actions (step 7) are repeated.

The best services for online analysis

Lexis Res

The Lexis Res website is one of the best services for parsing by members on English language. Main advantagedetailed description all meanings of a single word, which will help users who learn English.

The interface consists of two buttons. Team " Analyze» starts the process. The results are available at the bottom of the page. Function " Random sentences» will allow you to get acquainted with the work of the site on the example of a random offer.

pros:

  • Detailed parsing.
  • No annoying ads.
  • Wide functionality of the service.
  • Minimalist interface.
  • Extensive database of words.

Minuses:

  • The resource is adapted only for English expressions.
  • Lack of graphic designations.
  • Without proper knowledge foreign language reading detailed explanations will be difficult.

Delph-in

The Delph-in service is another English-language resource dedicated to parsing. Uniqueness is that it uses the programming language Linguistic Knowledge Builder, which is used in foreign universities.

Using the Linguistic Knowledge Builder method gives benefits in terms of detail and its components. The English Resource Grammar technology, which is also used in foreign education, is responsible for visualization.

Advantages:

  • Great for exploring narrowly focused offers.
  • A huge number of tools for parsing by parts of speech.
  • There is no limit on the number of characters.

Flaws:

  • People who have a good base of English will be able to fully work with the service.
  • Cumbersome interface, the development of which will take time.

MorphologyOnline

The MorphologyOnline website is a Russian-language resource dedicated to syntax. The site interface fits in one button. From user required enter the required word, and the program will analyze it.

For the convenience of users, the service provides step-by-step verification. In most cases, the verification process is carried out in three stages: the definition of the part of speech, morphological features and the likely syntactic role.

pros:

  • Detailed analysis.
  • Site operation.
  • No ads.

Minuses:

  • Parsing is carried out within a single word.
  • The main focus of the resource is on morphology.
  • Narrow specialization.

Gramota.ru

Gramota.ru is a Russian-language site that parses the requested word. submitted service provides checking the selected word not only for syntactic and morphological features, but runs the selected word through all popular dictionaries, including a dictionary of specialized terms.

Advantages:

  • Detailed analysis of the word, including the search for meaning in dictionaries.
  • Nice user interface.
  • Possibility to choose criteria.

Flaws:

  • The program parses one word at a time.
  • The site is more focused on morphological analysis.

goldlit

The Goldlit website is one of the best portals for parsing. Key advantage before Russian-speaking competitors - the ability to analyze proposals in their entirety.

The algorithm of actions is extremely simple: the user enters a phrase or word. The portal processes the information and parses each word separately. Near each member spelled initial forms words, part of speech to which it belongs, and then grammatical analysis and declension by cases are performed.

pros:

  • Detailed syntactic and grammatical analysis.
  • There are no restrictions on the subject and number of characters.
  • Friendly interface.
  • The site is easy to learn.
  • Additional information on the literature.

Minuses:

  • No grammar guides.
  • The service is more focused on literature.

Middle and high school students regularly face the problem of how to conduct an analysis in the Russian literary language.

Parsing is done in accordance with a certain scheme. This topic in school course allows identify sentence structure, characterize it, which reduces punctuation illiteracy.

In contact with

What parsing shows

There are four main types of parsing: phonetic, morphological, compositional, and syntactic. The latter is understood as analysis or parsing syntactic units with paramount highlighting the grammatical basis. The analysis is carried out according to the approved algorithm of actions: underline the members + characterize them + draw a diagram.

Schoolchildren, having studied eleven grades, sometimes do not know what the parsing of a sentence is. They talk about analysis as about analysis by composition. This is not true, since only individual lexemes are parsed by composition. As for a bunch of words expressing a complete thought, then in primary school process is named as analysis of the proposal by members. However, in the middle and high school it takes on a deeper meaning. Based on this, it is necessary to remember once and for all that the analysis of the sentence by composition in the Russian language classes is not performed.

The answer here is obvious - everyone knows the subject, pointing to an object or object, and the predicate - to actions taken first. To make the speech clearer and the statement complete, the main members are supplemented by secondary ones, which have a set of features.

Secondary members of the sentence allow you to reveal a holistic picture of ongoing events. Their purpose is to explain describe the actions of the main predecessors.

At the next stage, you will have to parse the proposal for. Here we mean how its members are expressed. Each has several options, you must choose the correct one by asking the question:

  • mean - noun, local;
  • skaz. - ch., cr. adj., noun;
  • def. - adj., local, num.;
  • add. - noun, local;
  • obst. - adverb, noun with a suggestion.

In view of the above, a more or less clear idea of ​​what parsing a sentence is is emerging. In a word, this is a complex analysis of related lexemes that express a complete thought.

Characteristics of syntactic units

It is necessary to know the criteria that a lexeme has in order to carry out a detailed description. The characteristic of the sentence in the text assumes a certain algorithm.

Define the view:

  • according to the purpose of the statement (narrative, interrogative, incentive);
  • by emotional-expressive coloring (by intonation) - exclamatory or non-exclamatory.

Finding grammar.

We talk sequentially about each member of the sentence, the means of their expression.

We describe the structure of the syntactic unit. For a simple suggestion:

  • by composition: one-part (definite-personal, indefinite-personal, generalized-personal, impersonal, nominative) or two-part;
  • by prevalence: common or not common;
  • by completeness: complete or incomplete.
  • what is complicated: homogeneous members, interjections, appeal, introductory constructions.

Determine to which type is a compound sentence:

  • compound sentences (CSP) - they are indicated by simple parts connected by a coordinating union;
  • complex sentences (CSS) - we establish the main, as well as the subordinate word, based on the question and the peculiarity of the construction (what it refers to, what the subordinate clause is attached to), determine the type of the latter;
  • non-union complex sentence (BSP) - we establish how many simple parts a syntactic unit consists of, determining the meaning of each (simultaneity, sequence, opposition, etc.).

We give the argument for what reason we put these punctuation marks.

If the task involves drawing up a diagram, then we do it.

It is more difficult to parse a complex sentence.

More here parameters for analysis.

After the complex sentence from the examples is disassembled into simple parts, we proceed to the analysis of each of them separately.

Following the algorithm, the student will not have problems with completing the task under the number 4.

How to draw a diagram

It is not always enough to correctly parse a simple sentence to get an excellent mark. The student must also be able to draw diagrams of the described units.

  1. Highlight the subject by underlining with one line, and the predicate with two lines.
  2. Find minor members, underlining them according to generally accepted rules.
  3. Sentences with a turnover or participle are highlighted as follows and are indicated in the final scheme. The adverbial turnover is highlighted on both sides by vertical lines, and a dot / dotted line is underlined. Participial highlighted on both sides with vertical lines, and is underlined by a wavy line.
  4. The union is not included in the scheme of a compound sentence, it is taken out of the framework. But complex sentences include it in adnexal part. unions and allied words enclosed in an oval.

Important! Before you draw up a sentence diagram, you need to learn how to graphically designate homogeneous members. They are enclosed in a circle, and the appeal, which is not a member of the syntactic unit, is indicated in the scheme by the letter "O" and is separated by two vertical lines. Do the same with introductory words.

Offer scheme easy to make with direct speech. Here it is important to separate one part from the other, i.e. the words of the author from direct speech, putting the appropriate punctuation marks between them.

Simple Sentence Parsing Sample

We write down an example and proceed to the analysis.

I have never seen a lake more magnificent than Baikal.

Stage I: analysis of the proposal by members:

  • "I" - mean, pronounced lich. places;
  • “I didn’t see” - simple Ch. skaz., pronounced verb. will express in the form. incl. past vr.;

Stage II: We find out which members of the sentence form the basis of grammar. Here it will be - "I did not see", so we are dealing with a simple sentence.

AT specific example all minor members joined the predicate:

  • didn’t see (what?) the lake - add., pronounced noun. in R.P.;
  • lakes (which one?) are more magnificent - inconsistent, defined, pronounced adj. in the comparison degrees;
  • more magnificent (what?) Baikal - additional, pronounced noun. in R.P.

Stage III: at the end of the process give general characteristics simple sentence In russian language:

  • by structure - two-part, widespread, complete;
  • according to the purpose of the statement - narrative;
  • by intonation - non-exclamatory, therefore, a punctuation mark is placed at the end - a period.

Stage IV: parsing a simple sentence involves the scheme [- =].

More problems are caused by parsing a sentence with participle turnover. See his examples below.

Sample: Behind the swamp, blazing with birches, a grove could be seen.

Characteristics: narrative, unexcused, simple, two-part, widespread, complete, complicated by a separate deep. about.

Scheme: [, I ger. turnover I, = - ].

Syntactic units complicated by homogeneous members, turnovers are parsed in a similar way.

Simple sentences with adverbial turnover should receive an objective assessment. They indicate which member the entire turnover is, then its parts are parsed into words.

Sample: The moon had just emerged from behind the mound and was illuminating translucent, small, low clouds.

Characteristics: narrative, unexcited, homogeneous tales. connected by a non-repeating union “and”, therefore, a comma is not placed between them, and commas must be placed between definitions, they have an union-free connection, simple, two-part, common, complicated by homogeneous skaz. and def.

Scheme: [- = and = O, O, O].

Parsing complex sentences

The home exercise in Russian regularly contains a mandatory task under the number 4. There are diverse examples here: SSP, SPP, BSP.

Always, when parsing a complex sentence, you need to start it with finding the grammatical basis.

It is necessary to analyze complex sentences based on the definition of the main and subordinate clauses.

Parsing of syntactic units with several subordinate clauses is carried out according to the general plan, as if done analysis of the composition of the proposal, but indicating the type of subordination and a combination of these types. Below are samples complex sentences with examples, with diagrams, clearly showing analysis.

SOP pattern with consistent submission: The kids reported that they picked those daisies that grandma loved.

Characteristics: narrative, non-exclamation, complex, allied, its parts are connected by a subordinate relationship with consistent subordination, consists of two simple ones.

Scheme: [-=], (which = (which = -).

SSP sample: Life is given once, and you want to live it cheerfully, meaningfully, beautifully.

Feature: narrative, non-exclamation, complex sentence, has two grammatical bases, allied, compound. The conjunction "and" expresses simultaneity. The 2nd simple sentence is complicated by homogeneous obst. states.

Scheme: [-=], and [=].

BSP sample: Wind howls, thunder rumbles.

Characteristic: narrative, non-exclamation, complex non-union.

Scheme: [-=], [-=].

Parsing a simple sentence

How to parse

Conclusion

If you have before your eyes sentences, examples with diagrams, then visual memory automatically works. This helps a lot for control dictations and independent. In this way, you can learn automatically and correctly parse suggestions (if the examples are chosen correctly), highlight all the criteria necessary for the analysis.

Parsing plan:

  • Compound.

    The number of parts in the complex, their boundaries (highlight the grammatical foundations in simple sentences).

    Means of communication between parts (indicate unions and determine the meaning of a complex sentence).

    Offer scheme.

Parsing sample:

Was winter but all last days stood thaw. (I. Bunin).

(Descriptive, non-exclamatory, complex, allied, compound, consists of two parts, opposition is expressed between the first and second parts, the parts are connected by an adversative union but.)

Offer scheme:

1 but 2 .

The order of syntactic analysis of a complex sentence

Parsing plan:

    Type of sentence according to the purpose of the statement (narrative, interrogative or incentive).

    The type of sentence by emotional coloring (exclamatory or non-exclamatory).

  • Complicated.

    Main and subordinate parts.

    What does the adjective extend.

    What is attached to the accessory part.

    Attachment location.

    Attachment type.

    Scheme of a complex sentence.

Parsing sample:

When she is played down on piano 1, I got up and listened 2 . (A.P. Chekhov)

(The narrative, non-exclamatory, complex, allied, complex, consists of two parts. The 2nd part is the main one, the 1st is the subordinate, the subordinate part extends the main part and joins it with the union when, the subordinate part is located in front of the main part, the type of the subordinate part is the subordinate time).

Offer scheme:

(conjunction when ...) 1 , [ ... ] 2 .

adnexal

Exist. verb. union of places. Verb. etc. adj. noun

Wayfarers saw, what they are on the small clearing. (Narrative, non-exclamatory, complex, NGN with adjective explanatory, 1) non-distributed, two-state, complete. 2) distribution, two-state, noon).

[ ____ ], (what…).

The order of syntactic analysis of a non-union complex sentence

Parsing plan:

    Type of sentence according to the purpose of the statement (narrative, interrogative or incentive).

    The type of sentence by emotional coloring (exclamatory or non-exclamatory).

  • Unionless.

    Number of parts (highlight grammatical foundations in simple sentences).

    Offer scheme.

Parsing sample:

The song ended 1 - the usual applause 2 rang out. (I.S. Turgenev)

(The narrative, non-exclamatory, complex, non-union, consists of two parts, the first part indicates the duration of what is said in the second part, a dash is placed between the parts.)

Offer scheme: