Gia program for a master's degree graduate. WRC protection procedure

In accordance with paragraph 5 of Article 59 federal law dated December 29, 2012 No. 273-FZ "On education in Russian Federation"(Collected Legislation of the Russian Federation, 2012, No. 53, Art. 7598; 2013, No. 19, Art. 2326; No. 23, Art. 2878; No. 27, Art. 3462; No. 30, Art. 4036; No. 48, Art. 6165; 2014, No. 6, item 562; No. 6, item 566; No. 19, item 2289; No. 22, item 2769; No. 23, item 2933; No. 26, item 3388; No. 30, 4263; 2015, No. 1, article 42; article 53; article 72) and subparagraph 5.2.36 of the Regulations on the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation, approved by the Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation of June 3, 2013 No. 466 (Meeting of the legislation of the Russian Federation, 2013, No. 23, Article 2923; No. 33, Article 4386; No. 37, Article 4702; 2014, No. 2, Article 126; Article 582; No. 27, Article 3776), I order:

1. Approve the attached Procedure for conducting the state final certification for educational programs of higher education - bachelor's programs, specialist's programs and master's programs.

2. Recognize invalid the order of the Ministry of Education of the Russian Federation dated March 25, 2003 No. 1155 "On approval of the Regulations on the final state attestation graduates of higher educational institutions of the Russian Federation" (registered by the Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation on May 5, 2003, registration number 4490).

Registration number 38132

Application

The procedure for conducting the state final certification for educational programs of higher education - bachelor's programs, specialist's programs and master's programs
(approved by order of the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation dated June 29, 2015 No. 636)

1. The procedure for conducting state final certification for educational programs of higher education - bachelor's programs, specialist's programs and master's programs establishes the procedure for organizing and conducting educational activities for educational programs of higher education - bachelor's programs, specialist's programs and master's programs (hereinafter - organizations, educational programs), state final certification of students (cadets) (hereinafter referred to as students, graduates), completing the development of state-accredited educational programs, including forms of state final certification, requirements for the use of training and education tools, communication facilities during the state final certification, requirements presented to persons involved in the state final certification, the procedure for filing and considering appeals, changing and (or) canceling the cut ltats of the state final certification, as well as the features of the state final certification for students from among persons with disabilities.

2. State final examination is carried out by state examination boards in order to determine the compliance of the results of mastering basic educational programs by students with the relevant requirements of the federal state educational standard or educational standard * (1) (hereinafter together - the standard).

3. A student who does not have an academic debt and who has fully completed academic plan or an individual curriculum according to the relevant educational program higher education*(2).

4. Ensuring the conduct of the state final certification for educational programs is carried out by organizations * (3).

5. Organizations use the necessary educational activities means during the state final certification of students.

6. Students and persons involved in the state final attestation are prohibited from having and using means of communication during its conduct.

7. Persons mastering an educational program in the form of self-education or studying in an educational program of higher education that does not have state accreditation, have the right to externally pass the state final certification in an organization according to an educational program that has state accreditation, in accordance with this Procedure * (4).

8. The state final certification for educational programs containing information constituting a state secret is carried out in compliance with the requirements provided for by the legislation of the Russian Federation on state secrets.

9. It is not allowed to charge students for passing the state final certification * (5).

10. State final certification of learning organizations is carried out in the form of:

state exam;

defense of the final qualifying work (hereinafter together - state certification tests).

Specific forms of conducting the state final certification are established by organizations, taking into account the requirements established by the standard.

11. The state exam is conducted in one or more disciplines and (or) modules of the educational program, the results of the development of which are of decisive importance for professional activity graduates. The state examination is conducted orally or in writing.

12. Graduation qualification work is a work done by a student (several students together), demonstrating the level of preparedness of a graduate for independent professional activity.

13. The type of final qualifying work, the requirements for it, the procedure for its implementation and the criteria for its evaluation are established by the organization independently.

14. The volume (in credit units) of the state final certification, its structure and content are established by the organization in accordance with this Procedure.

15. The state final certification is carried out within the terms determined by the organization, but no later than June 30.

16. The results of each state attestation test are determined by the marks "excellent", "good", "satisfactory", "unsatisfactory". Grades "excellent", "good", "satisfactory" mean successful passing of the state attestation test.

17. Successful completion of the state final certification is the basis for issuing a student a document on higher education and on the qualification of the sample established by the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation * (6).

18. By decision of the collegial management body of the organization, as well as in cases provided for by the Federal Law of November 10, 2009 No. 259-FZ "On Moscow State University named after M.V. Lomonosov and St. Petersburg State University" * (7), persons who have successfully passed the state final certification are issued documents on education and qualifications, samples of which are independently established by organizations * (8).

19. Features of conducting state certification tests using e-learning, remote educational technologies determined by local regulations of the organization. When conducting state attestation tests using e-learning, distance learning technologies, the organization ensures the identification of students and control over compliance with the requirements established by the specified local regulations.

20. To conduct the state final certification and conduct appeals based on the results of the state final certification, the organization creates state examination commissions and appeal commissions (hereinafter collectively - commissions). Commissions are valid during the calendar year.

21. Commissions are created in the organization for each specialty and area of ​​training, or for each educational program, or for a number of specialties and areas of training, or for a number of educational programs.

22. The chairman of the state examination commission is approved no later than December 31, preceding the year of the state final certification:

a) for organizations that have the right to independently establish educational standards, - administrative act of the organization;

b) for organizations that are under the jurisdiction of federal executive bodies, with the exception of organizations from among those specified in subparagraph "a" of this paragraph - by the founders of organizations on the proposal of organizations;

c) for organizations under the jurisdiction of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation, municipal organizations and private educational organizations, - by the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation on the proposal of organizations.

23. The organization approves the composition of the commissions no later than 1 month before the start date of the state final certification.

24. The chairman of the state examination commission is approved from among the persons who do not work in this organization, who have degree doctor of sciences and (or) academic title of professor or leading specialists - representatives of employers or their associations in the relevant field of professional activity.

The head of the organization (the person performing his duties or the person authorized by the head of the organization - on the basis of the administrative act of the organization) is approved as the chairman of the appeal commission.

25. The chairmen of the commissions organize and control the activities of the commissions, ensure the unity of the requirements for students during the state final certification.

26. The composition of the state examination commission includes at least 4 people, of which at least 2 people are leading specialists - representatives of employers or their associations in the relevant field of professional activity (hereinafter referred to as specialists), the rest - persons related to the teaching staff of this organizations and (or) other organizations and (or) scientists of this organization and (or) other organizations with an academic title and (or) academic degree.

The appeal commission includes at least 4 people from among the persons belonging to the teaching staff of the organization and not included in the state examination commissions.

From among the persons included in the composition of the commissions, deputy chairmen of the commissions are appointed as chairmen of the commissions.

27. For the period of the state final certification to ensure the work of the state examination commission, from among the persons belonging to the teaching staff of the organization, scientists or administrative workers of the organization, its secretary is appointed as the chairman of the state examination commission. The Secretary of the State Examination Commission is not a member. The Secretary of the State Examination Commission keeps minutes of its meetings, presents necessary materials to the appeal committee.

28. The main form of activity of the commissions are meetings.

Meetings of the commissions are competent if at least two thirds of the members of the commissions participate in them.

The meetings of the commissions are held by the chairmen of the commissions, and in their absence - by the deputy chairmen of the commissions.

Decisions of the commissions are taken by a simple majority of votes of the members of the commissions participating in the meeting. In case of an equal number of votes, the chairperson has the casting vote.

29. Decisions taken by the commissions are documented in protocols.

The minutes of the meeting of the state examination commission for the admission of the state certification test reflect the list of questions asked to the student and the characteristics of the answers to them, the opinions of the members of the state examination commission on the level of preparedness of the student to solve professional problems identified during the state certification test, as well as the identified shortcomings in theoretical and practical training of the student.

The minutes of the meetings of the commissions are signed by the chairpersons. The protocol of the meeting of the State Examination Commission is also signed by the Secretary of the State Examination Commission.

The minutes of the meetings of the commissions are bound into books and kept in the archives of the organization.

30. The program of the state final certification, including the programs of state exams and (or) the requirements for final qualifying works and the procedure for their implementation, criteria for assessing the results of passing state exams and (or) defending graduation qualifying works approved by the organization, as well as the procedure for filing and considering appeals, are brought to the attention of students no later than six months before the start of the state final certification.

31. The state exam is conducted according to the program approved by the organization, containing a list of questions submitted for the state exam and recommendations for students on preparing for the state exam, including a list of recommended literature for preparing for the state exam.

Before the state exam, students are consulted on the issues included in the state exam program (hereinafter referred to as the pre-examination consultation).

32. The organization approves the list of topics for final qualification works offered to students (hereinafter referred to as the list of topics) and brings it to the attention of students no later than 6 months before the start date of the state final certification.

At the written request of the student (several students performing the final qualifying work together), the organization may, in the manner established by it, provide the student (students) with the opportunity to prepare and defend the final qualifying work on the topic proposed by the student (students), if the expediency of its development for practical application in the relevant field of professional activity or at a specific object of professional activity.

For the preparation of the final qualifying work for the student (several students performing the final qualifying work together), the administrative act of the organization assigns the head of the final qualifying work from among the employees of the organization and, if necessary, a consultant (consultants).

33. Not later than 30 calendar days before the day of the first state certification test, the organization approves by an administrative act the schedule of state certification tests (hereinafter referred to as the schedule), which indicates the dates, time and place of the state certification tests and pre-examination consultations, and brings the schedule to the attention of the student, members of the state examination commissions and appeals commissions, secretaries of state examination commissions, supervisors and consultants of final qualifying works.

When forming the schedule, a break between state attestation tests lasting at least 7 calendar days is established.

34. After the completion of the preparation of the final qualifying work by the student, the head of the final qualifying work submits to the organization a written review of the work of the student during the preparation of the final qualifying work (hereinafter referred to as the review). In case of completion of the final qualifying work by several students, the head of the final qualifying work submits to the organization a review of their joint work during the preparation of the final qualification work.

35. Graduation papers for master's and specialist's programs are subject to review.

To conduct a review of the final qualifying work, the specified work is sent by the organization to one or more reviewers from among persons who are not employees of the department, or the faculty (institute), or the organization in which the final qualifying work was completed. The reviewer analyzes the final qualifying work and submits to the organization a written review of the specified work (hereinafter referred to as the review).

If the final qualification work is of an interdisciplinary nature, it is sent by the organization to several reviewers. Otherwise, the number of reviewers is set by the organization.

36. The organization ensures that the student is familiarized with the feedback and review (reviews) no later than 5 calendar days before the day of defense of the final qualification work.

37. The final qualifying work, review and review (reviews) are submitted to the state examination commission no later than 2 calendar days before the day of defense of the final qualifying work.

38. The texts of final qualifying works, with the exception of texts of final qualifying works containing information constituting a state secret, are placed by the organization in the electronic library system of the organization and checked for the amount of borrowing. The procedure for placing the texts of final qualifying works in the electronic library system of the organization, checking for the amount of borrowing, including content, identifying unauthorized borrowings is established by the organization.

Access of persons to the texts of final qualification works must be provided in accordance with the legislation of the Russian Federation, taking into account the withdrawal of industrial, technical, economic, organizational and other information, including the results of intellectual activity in the scientific and technical field, on the methods of carrying out professional activities, which have actual or potential commercial value due to their unknown to third parties, in accordance with the decision of the copyright holder.

39. The results of the state attestation test, conducted orally, are announced on the day it is held, the results of the state attestation test, conducted in writing, on the next business day after the day it is held.

40. Students who did not pass the state final certification due to failure to appear at the state certification test for a good reason (temporary disability, performance of public or state duties, subpoena, transport problems (flight cancellation, lack of tickets), weather or in other cases, the list of which is established by the organization independently), has the right to pass it within 6 months after the completion of the state final certification.

The student must submit to the organization a document confirming the reason for his absence.

A student who has not passed one state attestation test for a good reason is allowed to pass the next state attestation test (if any).

41. Students who did not pass the state certification test due to failure to appear at the state certification test for an unexcused reason or in connection with receiving an "unsatisfactory" grade, as well as students specified in paragraph 43 of this Procedure and who did not pass the state certification test in the period established for them term (due to failure to appear at the state attestation test or receiving an "unsatisfactory" grade), are expelled from the organization with the issuance of a certificate of study as having not fulfilled their obligations for the conscientious development of the educational program and the implementation of the curriculum.

42. A person who has not passed the state final certification may re-pass the state final certification no earlier than one year and no later than five years after the deadline for the state final certification, which was not passed by the student.

In order to re-pass the state final attestation, the specified person, upon his application, is reinstated in the organization for a period of time established by the organization, but not less than the period of time provided for by the calendar curriculum for the state final attestation for the relevant educational program.

When re-passing the state final certification, at the request of the student, by the decision of the organization, he may be assigned a different topic for the final qualifying work.

43. For disabled students, the state final certification is carried out by the organization, taking into account the peculiarities of their psychophysical development, their individual capabilities and health status (hereinafter referred to as individual characteristics).

44. When conducting the state final certification, the following general requirements are observed:

carrying out the state final certification for the disabled in the same classroom together with students who do not have disabilities, if this does not create difficulties for students when passing the state final certification;

the presence in the audience of an assistant (assistants) who provides students with disabilities with the necessary technical assistance, taking into account their individual characteristics (take workplace, move around, read and complete the task, communicate with members of the state examination committee);

the use of the technical means necessary for students with disabilities when passing the state final certification, taking into account their individual characteristics;

ensuring the possibility of unhindered access for students with disabilities to classrooms, toilets and other premises, as well as their stay in these premises (the presence of ramps, handrails, extended doorways, elevators, in the absence of elevators, the audience should be located on the first floor, the presence of special chairs and other devices) .

45. All local regulations of the organization on the issues of conducting the state final certification are brought to the attention of students with disabilities in an accessible form for them.

46. ​​At the written request of a student with a disability, the duration of passing a state certification test by a student with a disability may be increased in relation to the established duration of its delivery:

the duration of passing the state exam, held in writing, - no more than 90 minutes;

the duration of the preparation of the student for the answer to the state exam, conducted orally, - no more than 20 minutes;

the duration of the student's speech during the defense of the final qualifying work - no more than 15 minutes.

47. Depending on the individual characteristics of students with disabilities, the organization ensures that the following requirements are met when conducting the state certification test:

a) for the blind:

assignments and other materials for passing the state certification test are drawn up in Braille or in the form of an electronic document accessible using a computer with a specialized software for the blind, or read out by an assistant;

written tasks are performed by students on paper in Braille or on a computer with specialized software for the blind, or dictated to an assistant;

if necessary, students are provided with a kit stationery and paper for writing in Braille, a computer with specialized software for the blind;

b) for the visually impaired:

assignments and other materials for passing the state attestation test are drawn up in an enlarged font;

individual uniform illumination of at least 300 lux is provided;

if necessary, students are provided with a magnifying device, it is allowed to use magnifying devices available to students;

c) for the deaf and hard of hearing, with severe speech impairments:

the availability of sound amplifying equipment for collective use is provided, if necessary, students are provided with sound amplifying equipment for individual use;

at their request, state attestation tests are carried out in writing;

d) for persons with disorders of the musculoskeletal system (severe disorders of the motor functions of the upper limbs or the absence of upper limbs):

written tasks are performed by students on a computer with specialized software or dictated to an assistant;

at their request, state attestation tests are conducted orally.

48. A student with a disability, no later than 3 months before the start of the state final certification, submits a written application on the need to create for him special conditions when conducting state attestation tests indicating the features of his psychophysical development, individual capabilities and health status (hereinafter referred to as individual characteristics). The application is accompanied by documents confirming that the student has individual characteristics (in the absence of these documents in the organization).

In the application, the student indicates the need (lack of need) for the presence of an assistant at the state certification test, the need (lack of need) to increase the duration of the state certification test in relation to the established duration (for each state certification test).

49. Based on the results of state certification tests, the student has the right to appeal.

50. The student has the right to file a written appeal with the Appeal Commission about the violation, in his opinion, of the established procedure for conducting the state certification test and (or) disagreement with the results of the state exam.

51. An appeal is filed personally by students to the appeal commission no later than the next working day after the announcement of the results of the state certification test.

52. To consider the appeal, the secretary of the state examination commission sends to the appeal commission the minutes of the meeting of the state examination commission, the conclusion of the chairman of the state examination commission on compliance with procedural issues during the state certification test, as well as the written answers of the student (if any) (for consideration of the appeal on conducting state examination) or final qualifying work, review and review (reviews) (to consider an appeal for the defense of the final qualifying work).

53. The appeal is considered no later than 2 working days from the date of filing the appeal at a meeting of the appeal commission, to which the chairman of the state examination commission and the student who filed the appeal are invited.

The decision of the appeal commission is brought to the attention of the student who filed the appeal within 3 working days from the date of the meeting of the appeal commission. The fact of familiarization of the student who filed the appeal with the decision of the appeal commission is certified by the signature of the student.

54. When considering an appeal on violation of the procedure for conducting a state attestation test, the appeal commission takes one of the following decisions:

on the rejection of the appeal, if the information contained in it about violations of the procedure for conducting the state final certification of the student was not confirmed and (or) did not affect the result of the state certification test;

on the satisfaction of the appeal, if the information contained in it about the violations of the procedure for conducting the state final certification of the student was confirmed and affected the result of the state certification test.

In the case specified in paragraph three of this paragraph, the result of the state attestation test is subject to cancellation, in connection with which the protocol on the consideration of the appeal is transferred to the state examination commission no later than the next business day for the implementation of the decision of the appeal commission. The student is given the opportunity to pass the state attestation test within the time limits established by the educational organization.

55. When considering an appeal about disagreement with the results of the state attestation test, the appeal commission makes one of the following decisions:

on the rejection of the appeal and the preservation of the result of the state attestation test;

on the satisfaction of the appeal and the presentation of a different result of the state attestation test.

The decision of the appeal commission is submitted to the state examination commission no later than the next working day. The decision of the appeal commission is the basis for the cancellation of the previously issued result of the state attestation test and the issuance of a new one.

56. The decision of the Appeal Commission is final and not subject to revision.

57. The re-conduct of the state attestation test is carried out in the presence of one of the members of the appeal commission no later than July 15.

58. An appeal to re-conduct the state attestation test is not accepted.

______________________________

*(1) Part 4 of Article 59 of the Federal Law of December 29, 2012 No. 273-FZ "On Education in the Russian Federation" (Sobraniye Zakonodatelstva Rossiyskoy Federatsii, 2012, No. 53, Art. 7598; 2013, No. 19, Art. 2326 ; No. 23, item 2878; No. 27, item 3462; No. 30, item 4036; No. 48, item 6165; 2014, No. 6, item 562; Item 566; No. 19, item 2289; No. 22, Article 2769; No. 23, Article 2933; No. 26, Article 3388; No. 30, Article 4263; 2015, No. 1, Article 42; Article 53, Article 72).

*(2) Part 6 of Article 59 of the Federal Law of December 29, 2012 No. 273-FZ "On Education in the Russian Federation" (Sobraniye Zakonodatelstva Rossiyskoy Federatsii, 2012, No. 53, Art. 7598; 2013, No. 19, Art. 2326 ; No. 23, item 2878; No. 27, item 3462; No. 30, item 4036; No. 48, item 6165; 2014, No. 6, item 562; Item 566; No. 19, item 2289; No. 22, Article 2769; No. 23, Article 2933; No. 26, Article 3388; No. 30, Article 4263; 2015, No. 1, Article 42; Article 53, Article 72).

*(3) Paragraph 3 of Part 12 of Article 59 of the Federal Law of December 29, 2012 No. 273-FZ "On Education in the Russian Federation" (Sobraniye Zakonodatelstva Rossiyskoy Federatsii, 2012, No. 53, Art. 7598; 2326; No. 23, item 2878; No. 27, item 3462; No. 30, item 4036; No. 48, item 6165; 2014, No. 6, item 562; Item 566; No. 19, item 2289 ; No. 22, item 2769; No. 23, item 2933; No. 26, item 3388; No. 30, item 4263; 2015, No. 1, item 42; Item 53, item 72).

*(4) Part 3 of Article 34 of the Federal Law of December 29, 2012 No. 273-FZ "On Education in the Russian Federation" (Sobraniye Zakonodatelstva Rossiyskoy Federatsii, 2012, No. 53, Art. 7598; 2013, No. 19, Art. 2326 ; No. 23, item 2878; No. 27, item 3462; No. 30, item 4036; No. 48, item 6165; 2014, No. 6, item 562; Item 566; No. 19, item 2289; No. 22, Article 2769; No. 23, Article 2933; No. 26, Article 3388; No. 30, Article 4263; 2015, No. 1, Article 42; Article 53, Article 72).

*(5) Part 8 of Article 59 of the Federal Law of December 29, 2012 No. 273-FZ "On Education in the Russian Federation" (Sobraniye Zakonodatelstva Rossiyskoy Federatsii, 2012, No. 53, Art. 7598; 2013, No. 19, Art. 2326 ; No. 23, item 2878; No. 27, item 3462; No. 30, item 4036; No. 48, item 6165; 2014, No. 6, item 562; Item 566; No. 19, item 2289; No. 22, Article 2769; No. 23, Article 2933; No. 26, Article 3388; No. 30, Article 4263; 2015, No. 1, Article 42; Article 53, Article 72).

*(6) Part 4 of Article 60 of the Federal Law of December 29, 2012 No. 273-FZ "On Education in the Russian Federation" (Sobraniye Zakonodatelstva Rossiyskoy Federatsii, 2012, No. 53, Art. 7598; 2013, No. 19, Art. 2326 ; No. 23, item 2878; No. 27, item 3462; No. 30, item 4036; No. 48, item 6165; 2014, No. 6, item 562; Item 566; No. 19, item 2289; No. 22, Article 2769; No. 23, Article 2933; No. 26, Article 3388; No. 30, Article 4263; 2015, No. 1, Article 42; Article 53, Article 72).

*(7) Part 5 of Article 4 of the Federal Law of November 10, 2009 No. 259-FZ "On Moscow State University named after M.V. Lomonosov and St. Petersburg State University" (Collected Legislation of the Russian Federation, 2009, No. 46, Art. 5418, 2013, No. 19, item 2311, No. 27, item 3477).

*(8) Part 5 of Article 60 of the Federal Law of December 29, 2012 No. 273-FZ "On Education in the Russian Federation" (Sobraniye Zakonodatelstva Rossiyskoy Federatsii, 2012, No. 53, Art. 7598; 2013, No. 19, Art. 2326 ; No. 23, item 2878; No. 27, item 3462; No. 30, item 4036; No. 48, item 6165; 2014, No. 6, item 562; Item 566; No. 19, item 2289; No. 22, Article 2769; No. 23, Article 2933; No. 26, Article 3388; No. 30, Article 4263; 2015, No. 1, Article 42; Article 53, Article 72).

Document overview

A procedure has been established for conducting state final attestation (SFA) for bachelor's, specialist's and master's programs.

A student who has completed the curriculum (including individual) for the relevant program and has no debt is allowed to the GIA.

Certification is carried out in the form of a state examination and defense of the final qualifying work. The state exam is taken in 1 or several disciplines and (or) modules of the educational program, the results of the development of which are of decisive importance for the professional activities of graduates. It may be oral or written. The list of questions submitted for the exam is established by the educational organization.

The type, topics, order of execution and criteria for evaluating final qualification works, requirements for them are also determined by the university. Graduation works for master's and specialist's programs are reviewed.

Upon successful completion of the GIA, a document on higher education and qualifications is issued. Its sample is approved by the Ministry of Education and Science of Russia. Moscow State University M.V. Lomonosov and St. Petersburg State University have the right to establish own samples such documents.

Examination and appeal commissions are created to conduct the GIA and appeals based on its results. They are valid for a calendar year. It is established how they are formed and work.

30 days before the start of the certification tests, the university approves their schedule. The break between exams must be at least 7 days.

You can retake the GIA in a year, but not later than 5 years after its completion.

The features of the GIA of students with disabilities have been established.

Based on the results of the GIA, the student has the right to file an appeal. The procedure has been written.

The former procedure for conducting the final state certification of graduates Russian universities loses its power.

In accordance with the Rules for the preparation of VKR and KR, masters of the State Medical University have two pre-defenses:

1. cathedral defense

2. inter-cathedral pre-defense, dates: April 24-25, 2019

protection Master's theses in 2019 will be held on the following dates: 29 and 30 May.

List of students with approved topics of the WRC 2nd year of the State Medical University.xlsx

You can make changes to WRC topics no later than April 25. To do this, you must fill out and sign an application for changing the topic with the head of the WRC and enter the changed topic into a Google spreadsheet.

ATTENTION!!! Deadline uploading the final version of the final qualifying work to the LMS system until May 19, 2019

Remember that you can only upload a work to LMS once!!!

The final version of the master's thesis is provided by the student to the study office at: Myasnitskaya, 20, office. 219(b) no later than May 22, 2019.

The study office must provide:

1. bound work in hard copy(2 copies), one copy. d.b. hard cover, the second spring is allowed
2. review of the head of the WRC (original and copy)
3. a registration sheet confirming that the work has been checked in a system that detects the percentage of borrowings, with an annotation in Russian and English (2 copies with the student's signature).

GIA orders

Order of the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation of June 29, 2015 N 636 "On approval of the procedure for conducting state final certification for educational programs of higher education - bachelor's programs, specialist's programs and master's programs"– approves the procedure for conducting state final certification for educational programs of higher education - bachelor's programs, specialist's programs and master's programs.

Anti-plagiarism

In accordance with p

Appeal of GIA results

Postgraduate leave

before the date of the GIA. Holidays are available until August 8, 2019.

Vacation Application 2019.docx

Defense of master's theses in 2017 students of the master's program "State and municipal management" held 7 and 8 June at 10.00 at the address: Myasnitskaya, 20, according to the schedule:

Anti-plagiarism

VKR is mandatory checked in the "Antiplagiarism" system in accordance withIn case of detection of the fact of plagiarism during the preparation of the WQR, the Procedure for the application of disciplinary sanctions for violations of academic standards in educational work at the University, which is.

Conditions for obtaining a red diploma

In accordance with p 3.31.3. A diploma with honors is issued to graduates under the following conditions:
1. all grades indicated in the annex to the diploma for disciplines (modules), practices, projects, grades for term papers (projects) are grades "excellent", "good" or "passed";
2. all grades based on the results of the GIA are grades "excellent";
3. the share of the grades indicated in the appendix to the diploma "excellent", including grades based on the results of the GIA, is at least 75% of total grades, with the exception of the "passed" grades indicated in the Diploma Supplement.

Appeal of GIA results

(AK) for 2017

From September 1st AK secretary - Prisyazhnyuk Daria Igorevna ( E-mail: , Address: Krivokolenny lane, 3, room 3-216)

Students have the right to file an appeal in the form of a personal written reasoned statement to the Secretary of the Appeal Commission no later than the next working day after the announcement of the results. Grounds for an appeal may include:

Violation, in the opinion of the student, of the established procedure for conducting the state exam or defending the WRC;
- disagreement of the student with the results of the state exam.

The procedure for organizing and conducting appeals based on the results of state certification tests can be found in the relevant section.

Postgraduate leave

Students who successfully pass the GIA are entitled to postgraduate leave. To do this, you must submit an application to the Study Office. until June 07, 2017 inclusive. Holidays can be granted until August 5, 2017.

Features of the organization of the GIA for students with disabilities

A disabled student no later than 3 months before the start of the GIA can submit an application to the study office on the need to create special conditions for him during the GIA, indicating individual characteristics, attaching the necessary documents.

After the defense, graduates need to go to the study office room. 219:

1. take a bypass sheet: affix stamps in the library, in the hostel, in the accounting department
2. return student and reader tickets
3. write an application for a diploma of first education
4. sign in the layout of the diploma, supplement and European Diploma Supplement
5. if necessary, write an application for vacation

7.1. The final stage of training in the magistracy is the final state certification. The final state certification of graduates of the master's program includes the defense of the final qualifying work in the form of a master's thesis and the state exam, established by the decision of the Academic Council of the University in accordance with the requirements of the Federal State Educational Standard of Higher Professional Education.

7.2. The state exam program is developed by the graduating department. For an objective assessment of a graduate's competencies, the topics of examination questions and assignments must be comprehensive, correspond to sections from various educational cycles aimed at the formation of specific competencies.

7.3. Work on a master's thesis should, as a rule, be planned from the first year of study in a master's program.

7.4. Students who have fully fulfilled all the requirements of this program and successfully passed the final state exams are allowed to defend a master's thesis.

7.5. The procedure for defending a master's thesis is determined by the Regulations on the final state certification of FSBEI HPE "SamSTU".

7.6. Persons who have fully completed the curriculum for the relevant master's program and successfully passed the final state certification are awarded the qualification (degree) "Master" and a state diploma with an application.

7.7. A master student who has not passed the final state exam, who has not defended his final qualification work, or who is expelled from the master's program for academic failure, is issued an academic certificate of the established form.

8. Requirements for a master's thesis

8.1. The master's thesis is carried out during the period of internship and research work and is an independent and logically completed final qualifying work prepared for public defense and showing the level of the student's professional training.

8.2. When completing a master's thesis, undergraduates must show the ability and ability, based on the acquired in-depth knowledge, skills and formed general cultural and professional competencies, to independently solve the tasks of their professional activity at the modern level (research, organizational and managerial, expert, analytical, pedagogical), professionally present special information, scientifically argue and defend one's point of view.

8.3. The topics of final qualifying works should be aimed at solving professional problems:

analysis of literature on the topic of the dissertation and preparation of a literature review;

development of a research plan and methods for its implementation;

carrying out experimental (calculation or theoretical) work, processing and analysis of the obtained data;

discussion of the results and development of proposals for the continuation of research;

preparation of progress reports and publications.

8.4. The choice of topics for master's theses and their approval by students is carried out according to the schedule of the educational process of the master's program in the first semester, but not more than a month after the start of the educational process. Topics of master's theses are chosen by students together with supervisors and approved by the academic councils of faculties upon the proposal of the leaders of master's programs. The decision of the Academic Council of the faculty on the approval of the topics of master's theses for master's programs implemented at the faculty is submitted to the Department of Master's, Postgraduate and Doctoral Studies.

8.5. The topic of the dissertation should correspond to the master's program, according to which the student is studying, and the directions of the research work of the graduating department.

8.6. The dissertation is drawn up in accordance with GOST 7.32-2001 “System of standards for information, librarianship and publishing. Research report. Structure and rules of registration”; GOST R 7.0.5-2008 System of standards for information, librarianship and publishing. " Bibliographic link. General requirements and rules for drafting”; GOST 7.1-2003 “Bibliographic record. Bibliographic description. General requirements and rules for drafting. The main requirements for the design of the dissertation text are given in Appendix 3.

8.7. According to its structure, the master's thesis should consist of sequentially arranged main elements, which include: title page, content (table of contents), introduction, main part, conclusion, list of references. The dissertation may contain applications.

8.8. The title page is the first page of the dissertation and is drawn up according to a single model (Appendix 4).

8.10. In the introduction to the master's thesis, the following should be formulated:

Relevance of the research topic;

the degree of development of the topic;

purpose and objectives of the study;

object and subject of research;

research methods;

the main features of the novelty of the dissertation research;

practical significance of the study;

dissertation structure.

8.11. A necessary requirement for a master's thesis is scientific novelty. The criteria for the scientific novelty of a dissertation are the results obtained by a student in one of the indicated areas of research:

development of a new theoretical position related to the subject of study and to the entire class of objects of study;

improvement (modification) existing models or methods for solving research problems related to the subject of research and / or to the entire class of research objects;

application already famous models and methods to a new subject area, allowing to obtain new knowledge about the object under study;

improvement of a known element of the control system related to the subject of study and to this object of study.

8.12. The main part of the dissertation includes chapters structured into paragraphs and corresponds to the tasks set in the introduction.

The main part reveals the main provisions of the work, formulates the problem under study, determines its place in theory or practice, analyzes points of view on the problem and considers practical recommendations for solving it offered by various authors, formulates and substantiates the author's own position. In the main part, it is necessary to reflect the results of the author's independent analysis of literary sources, statistical materials, as well as to give a creative assessment of the studied economic phenomenon or process.

8.13. The conclusion should contain the main, most significant conclusions and results formulated by the author on the basis of the study. The conclusion includes recommendations for the application of the results obtained.

8.14 The list of references is compiled in alphabetical order with a full bibliographic description of the sources used in writing the dissertation (Appendix 5). It is recommended to use end-to-end numbering and the following sequence of sources:

regulations;

educational literature, collections, monographs, articles (in Russian);

educational literature, collections, monographs, articles (in foreign languages);

other materials, incl. sources on electronic media.

8.15. The dissertation appendices may include primary research material, statistical data and tables, graphic material, calculations and other supporting materials that are referenced in the dissertation text. Applications are to be numbered in the order in which their data are used in the dissertation.

8.16. The text of the dissertation is submitted in printed form and on electronic media. The student is responsible for the compliance of the dissertation texts in printed form and on electronic media.

8.17. The thesis admitted for defense is transferred to the opponent and the reviewer, who are appointed by the State Attestation Commission. Opponents and reviewers can be specialists with higher education whose profile of scientific or practical work corresponds to the topic of the dissertation.

8.18. The feedback (review) evaluates the relevance of the topic, its novelty and significance, the degree of independence shown by the author, the ability to use the methods of scientific research, the degree of reliability and validity of the conclusions, and an analysis of the shortcomings of the dissertation is given.

8.19. The student has the right to submit additional reviews (reviews) from specialists of the relevant profile for defense.

Moscow State University named after M.V. Lomonosov
Faculty of Philology
branch modern languages and literature
Department of History foreign literature

MASTER STUDIES IN THE DIRECTION 520300 - "Philology"
MASTER PROGRAM

"History of Literature Western Europe and America:
classical texts, poetics, contexts"

Qualification (degree): master
Head: prof. V.M.Tolmachev

GIA PROGRAM FOR MASTER GRADUATES

Moscow
2016

The State Final Attestation (SFA) for graduates of the Master's program in the direction "History of Literature of Western Europe and America: Classical Texts, Poetics, Contexts" is carried out by a specially appointed State Examination Commission (hereinafter referred to as SEC) and consists of two stages:

I. State exam

The state exam is held orally and is passed by the SEC.

Each of the tickets offered to the graduate contains 4 questions that cover the material of all the special subjects passed by the undergraduate on the history of foreign literature of the Middle Ages and the Renaissance; XVII-XVIII centuries; 19th century; XX century (according to the disciplines of the curriculum).

Of these, the undergraduate graduate answers 2 questions.

1) The first question must necessarily be related to the historical and literary era (for example, the twentieth century), on the subject of which the graduate completed the WRC.

2) The second question is chosen at the discretion of the respondent, but it should not be related to the historical and literary era on which the WRC was made.

In total, the graduate will be offered 21 tickets (84 questions).

The undergraduate is given at least 60 minutes to prepare for the answer. The State Commission, having consistently listened to all the examinees, then makes a collegial decision on each (total) assessment and informs its graduates.

The exam is conducted orally in Russian with the possibility of giving individual examples in a foreign language (titles of works in the original language, citations). After listening to the answer to each of the questions, the SEC, if necessary, asks clarifying and additional questions (within the scope of the answer and understanding by the graduate of the analyzed material). When answering questions, the graduate must demonstrate fluency and purity of speech.

The total time for the main answer and additional answers is up to 45 minutes.

Criteria for evaluation

Grade "unsatisfactory"

1. Ignorance of the content of literary texts on the program, the date of their publication, the exact title.
2. Lack of understanding of the questions formulated in the ticket.
3. Lack of skills in literary analysis of classical Western literary texts (themes, problems, poetics; genre specification; belonging to a direction, style, artistic manner).
4. Scattered or fragmented knowledge about literary eras, the principles of their cultural, as well as historical and literary differentiation. Ignorance of the main cultural background (philosophy, art history).

Incorrect or overly abstract answer to the question of the ticket, to additional questions of the members of the examination committee.

Grade "satisfactory"

1. In general, well-formed, but containing serious gaps, knowledge of artistic material (an approximate knowledge of only the subject matter, as well as basic literary techniques).
2. Weak availability of skills of historical-typological, as well as comparative analysis (a literary text with a certain set of images, motives in the era system).
3. Vague knowledge about the boundaries of literary eras, the principles of the historical development of a particular direction, style.
4. Ignorance of special Russian and foreign scientific works on the topic of the issue.
5. Incomplete answer to the question of the ticket, to additional questions of the members of the examination committee.

Rated "good"

1. Formed skills in possession of historical and literary material, separate principles of its analysis, historical, literary and poetological understanding.
2. Sufficiently complete, but containing separate gaps, knowledge of general theoretical issues (limited understanding of Russian-language special works on the topic of the issue).
3. A fairly complete, but containing some shortcomings, answer to the question of the ticket, to additional questions of the members of the examination committee.

Rating "excellent"

1. Deep, independent skills in the possession of historical and literary material, its analysis (the place of a classical literary text in the work of a particular writer, era, world literature; knowledge various ways analysis of a literary text, taking into account its historical and species specificity).
2. Expression of one's own scientific view on the subject, taking into account the latest scientific literature.
3. The correct, complete answer to the question of the ticket, to the additional questions of the members of the examination committee.

Competencies

When answering the ticket, the graduate of the master's program must demonstrate the following universal and professional competencies -

Universal competencies:

a) general scientific:

• the ability to analyze and evaluate the literary process in the literature of Western Europe and America (from the early Middle Ages to the beginning of the 20th century) I c.);
• the ability to critically analyze Western literary texts in the original language in the cultural system;

b) instrumental:

• possession of tools for analyzing a foreign literary text in line with cultural, comparative historical, typological, formal approaches;
• possession of skills of work in foreign electronic resources and computer libraries;

c) systemic:

• the ability to comparative study of literary, philosophical, artistic (painting, cinema), documentary (historical, archival) texts in the context of historical poetics.

Professional competencies:

General professional competencies:

• knowledge of interdisciplinary opportunities for studying Western literary classics;
• possession of the categorical and terminological apparatus of modern Western literary criticism, the most important literary foreign scientific schools;
• possession of the skills of qualified philological expertise, criticism, interpretation, commentary and analysis of foreign literary texts of various eras;
• possession of the skills of translation, scientific commenting and preparation of scientific, popular science publications of Western literary, artistic, critical, journalistic and other texts;
• possession of the skills of biobibliographic description of foreign artistic literary texts.

These competencies cover the followinghistorical and literary, as well as cultural material:

• The idea of ​​fiction in the context of the culture of Western Europe and America, of the general and variant (national, individual) in the historical and cultural process from the Middle Ages to the beginning XXI in. Significance for Western literatures of the Christian tradition (biblical images), ancient heritage, dialogue / conflict between artistic epochs, generations, as well as the work of individual authors, works (Blessed Augustine, Scandinavian sagas, chivalric romance, troubadour poetry, Dante, Petrarch, Cervantes, Rabelais, Shakespeare, Milton, Corneille, Racine, Rousseau, Voltaire, Moliere, Defoe, Schiller, Goethe, Byron, Scott, Balzac, Stendhal, Hugo, Coleridge, Wordsworth, Dickens, Flaubert, Baudelaire, Zola, Ibsen, Hamsun, Strindberg, Joyce, D.G. Lawrence, Eliot, Pound, T. Mann, R. M. Rilke, Unamuno, Hemingway, Faulkner, Sartre, Camus, Beckett, Borges, Cortazar, Garcia Marquez, Eco, Ackroyd, Tournier, etc.) . The influence of theology (Western Church Fathers, Thomas Aquinas), philosophy (Renaissance humanists, Montaigne, Spinoza, Locke, Kant, Hegel, Schopenhauer, Marx, Nietzsche, Bergson, Heidegger, etc.), sociology (Comte, Taine), natural science knowledge (Darwin), psychoanalysis (Freud, Jung, Reich, etc.) on Western literature. Major historical events in the interpretation of Western writers. The war of ideologies, worldviews and its reflection in Western literature of the 20th century.
• The principles of periodization of the history of Western literature, the distinction between normative and non-normative poetics, classical and non-classical types of creativity. Historical and literary content of the main cultural (Middle Ages, Renaissance, Enlightenment, romanticism, modernism, postmodernism) and actually literary concepts used to characterize both a movement, a style, an individual personal manner (mannerism, baroque, classicism, rococo, romanticism and various romanticisms, Biedermeier, realism, naturalism, symbolism, various avant-gardes and modernisms, postmodernism) and the genre. Theoretical disputes about the boundaries of epochs, approaches to text analysis, about the productivity / unproductivity of individual terms and concepts.
• The development of lyrics, epic and drama from the Middle Ages to the beginning XXI in. Genre typology of the Western novel from the Renaissance to X 10th century (e.g. parenting novel, artist novel, historical novel, psychological novel, stream of consciousness novel, German "philosophical novel", existentialist novel, French "new novel"). Intertextuality and parody in postmodernism. The formation of Western criticism and literary criticism, milestones in their history (romantic criticism, positivist literary criticism, Marxism in literary criticism, formalism, existentialism, structuralism, post-structuralism).

Full list of questions

on the history of foreign literature from the Middle Ages to the beginning of the XXI century.
(the entire list of questions is known to undergraduate graduates six months before the exam)

for Master's degree graduates 2019

1. Interpretation of the Fall in "Paradise Lost" by J. Milton.
2. The genre tradition of the "history of conversion" in the novel "Robinson Crusoe" by D. Defoe.
3. The problem of evil in the novel "Lord of the Flies" by W. Golding.
4. Biblical allusions in the novel "A History of the World in 10 ½ Chapters" by J. Barnes.
5. The concept of the novel by E.M. Meletinsky.
6. "Discussion about the novel" M.M. Bakhtin and K.G. Kosikov.
7. The White Tyrant is a key work in the development of the novel genre.
8. Paradigmatic features of the novel genre in the work of Chrétien de Troyes.
9. The specifics of the novel poetics in Elisien de Kren's "Troubles and Torments of Love".
10. Antique Imagery in Dante's Inferno.
11. The structure and meaning of the song XXX "Purgatory" by Dante (the culmination of the "Divine Comedy").
12. Images of fire, water and light in Dante's Divine Comedy.
13. Three latest songs edging as an expression of their meaning ("Hell", "Purgatory", Paradise).
14. The principles of the image of the Lady by Petrarch. The myth of Daphne.
15. Features of the Spanish sonnet. His relationship with Spanish poetic genres.
16. Sonnets by W. Shakespeare (tradition and innovation).
17. Genre originality of "Hamlet".
18. Features of the tragic conflict in "Hamlet".
19. Genre features of Shakespeare's tragedies of the 1600s.
20. The tragic hero in Shakespeare's plays of the 1600s.
21. Donquixotism as a type of human behavior and the specificity of the "donquixote situation" in Cervantes' novel.
22. The victorious hero in the dramaturgy of Corneille and the hero-victim of the tragedies of Racine.
23. Varieties of "natural man" in D. Defoe's novel "The Adventures of Robinson Crusoe".
24. "Candide" Voltaire: "ordinary man" between the extremes of optimism and pessimism.
25. Rousseauism in its socio-political and literary-aesthetic variants ("The New Eloise" by J.-J. Rousseau).
26. The plot of "Faust" by Goethe as a process of Faust's awareness of his own personality and Faust as a symbol of humanity.
27. The theme of art in L. Thicke's short stories.
28. Romantic tradition in the work of E.T.A. Hoffmann.
29. The work of Novalis.
30. The main aspects of the "poetic revolution" W. Wordsworth.
31. Creativity of Shelley and Byron in the context of European romanticism.
32. Cross-cutting motives of Keats' poetry.
33. Victorian Poetry: Romantic Traditions and Individual Innovation (A. Tennyson, R. Browning,M. Arnold, J. M. Hopkins).
34. The principle of the miraculous in the prose of Ch. Dickens.
35. Detective story in the novels of Ch. Dickens.
36. The Romantic Hero and His Evolution in Ch. Dickens' Prose.
37. Narrative methods and character-narrators in the works of C. Dickens.
38. The problem of supersensible knowledge and spiritual blindness in the novels of C. Dickens.
39. Napoleonic theme in the works of O. de Balzac.
40. clash cultural epochs in the novels of W. Scott.
41. The protagonist of historical novels by W. Scott as a literary type.
42. The world of things in the novels of O. de Balzac.
43. Western literary naturalism XIX - XX centuries: unity, diversity, forms.
44. Openness of Western literary naturalism to synthesis (romanticism, symbolism, modernisms).
45. Varieties of artnaturalism in Western literature 19th century
46. Forms of Naturalism in Western Literature of the 20th Century.
47. Renewal of individualism in the dramaturgy of H. Ibsen.
48. Nietzsche on art and the artist.
49. Viennese literary modern: general characteristics and main representatives.
50. Symbolist dramaturgy and the formation of the director's theater.
51. The genre of the novel in the work of K. Hamsun.
52. Philosophical and symbolic dramas by A. Strindberg.
53. The work of G. von Hofmannsthal and the "crisis of the word".
54. A. Schnitzler's prose: the main conflict, the effect of surprise, "Eros and Thanatos", the image of the life of human consciousness.
55. Basic principles of R.M. Rilke.
56. The opposition of life and creativity in the works of T. Mann.
57. The drama of the artist in the works of T. Mann.
58. Psychoanalysis and Eastern philosophy in the work of G. Hesse.
59. The image of the artist in the prose of G. Hesse.
60. Imagism in poetry: theory and poetic practice.
61. Magazine "Poetry" "and the "poetic revival" in the United States in the 1910s–1920s.
62. Poems by T.S. Eliot from "The Waste Land" to "Four Quartets": themes, imagery, composition.
63. E. Pound: Poetry and Essayism from Imagism to Hugh Selwyn Mauberly.
64. E. Hemingway and W. Faulkner as part of the "modernist canon".
65. Images of Europe in the works of E. Hemingway.
66. The Motive of Violence in the Works of E. Hemingway.
67. Narrative Techniques of W. Faulkner in the Novels of the 1920s-1930s.
68. The origins of the literature of existentialism.
69. Short stories and theater by Jean-Paul Sartre as an illustration of the writer's philosophical theses.
70. The evolution of creativity A. Camus (cycles "Absurd", "Riot", "Love").
71. Poetics of the prose of A. Camus in the 1940s–1950s (“The Plague”, “The Fall”, short story writer).
72. The influence of French existentialism on world literature.
73. Magic realism and "wonderful reality".
74. The work of H.L. Borges and philosophical fiction.
75. J. Cortazar's work: ethics and metaphysics.
76. Forms of dystopia in Western literature of the twentieth century. (J. Orwell, R. Bradbury, E. Junger, G. Kazak, K. Kesey).
77. Post-war "new drama"(S. Beckett, E. Ionesco, J. Genet, G. Pinter, S. Mrozhek) and herinfluence on the drama and theater of the second half of the twentieth century.
78. "New novel": theory and practice (N. Sarrot, A. Robbe-Grillet, M. Butor, K. Simon).
79. The concept of "counter-culture", its relationship with the poetics of late modernism and neo-avant-garde. "Beats"; "black comedians".
80. The theme of war in the literature of Europe and America in the second half of the twentieth century. - the beginning of the XXI century.
81. Myth, symbol and allegory in fiction of the second half of the 20th century. Neomythologism (W. Golding, J. Updike, M. Tournier).
82. "Latin American boom" and its main concepts ("magical realism", forms of fantasy, social, games) in the works of G. Garcia Marquez, A. Carpentier, J. Cortazar.
83. Basic theories of postmodernism, manifestos of postmodernism (I. Hassan, F. Lyotard).
84. Artistic works of theorists of postmodernism as a "classic" of postmodernism (W. Eco, J. Barth, P. Ackroyd).

When preparing for the state exam, the graduate is recommended:

1. fill in the gaps in knowledge of the content of literary texts that appear in the list of examination questions;
2. get acquainted with the lecture notes on master's courses in the history of foreign literature;
3. if possible, correlate the knowledge gained in the study of the history of foreign literature with domestic scientific literature (according to the questions submitted for the exam);
4. visit profile scientific libraries(Fundamental Library of Moscow State University, VGBIL named after Rudomino), as well as get acquainted with materials on foreign literature posted on the Internet;
5. get advice from teachers of the Department of the History of Foreign Literature, who read them master's

Scientific literature

Preparing for the exam, the undergraduate gets acquainted with the scientific literature from the "Theory" section, as well as from that section ("Middle Ages and Renaissance", "XVII-XVIII centuries", "XIX century; turn of the XIX-XX centuries", "XX century”), which is associated with its specialization.

I. Theory

Averintsev S.S., Andreev M.L., Gasparov M.L., Grintser P.A., Mikhailov A.V. Categories of poetics in the change of literary epochs // Historical poetics. Literary epochs and types of artistic consciousness / Ed. ed. P.A. Grintser. M., 1994.

Introduction to Literary Studies. Literary work: basic concepts and terms / Chernets L.V., Khalizev V.E., Broytman S.N. et al. M., 1999 (or other later ed.).

Griftsov B.A. Psychology of the writer. M., 1988.

Foreign literature of the second millennium. 1000-2000 / Ed. L.G.Andreeva. M., 2001.

Companion A. Demon theory / Per. from fr. M., 2001.

Lotman Yu.M. The structure of the artistic text. M., 1970.

Nabokov, Vladimir. Lectures on foreign literature / Per. from English. M., 1998.

Modern literary theory / Comp. I.V. Kabanova. M., 2004.

Schaeffer J.-M. What is a literary genre? / Per. from fr. M., 2010.

II . History of literature and culture

Middle Ages and Renaissance

Averintsev S.S. Rhetoric and the origins of the European literary tradition. M., 1996.

Andreev M.L. Renaissance Culture // History of World Culture. Western heritage. M., 1998.

Batkin L.M. Italian Renaissance: Problems and people. M., 1995.

Bakhtin M.M. Creativity of Francois Rabelais and folk culture of the Middle Ages and the Renaissance. M., 1992.

Bitsilli P.M. The place of the Renaissance in the history of culture. M., 1996.

Gorbunov A.N. John Donne and English poetry of the 16th-17th centuries. M., 1993.

Gorbunov A.N. Shakespeare contexts. M., 2006.

Gorbunov A.N. Chaucer is medieval. M., 2010.

Dobrokhotov A.L. Dante. M., 1990.

Zyumtor P. Experience in constructing medieval poetics. SPb., 2003.

Le Goff J. Civilization of the Medieval West. M., 1992.

History of Italian Literature. Volume II. Renaissance. Book 1. Age of humanism / Responsible. ed. M.L. Andreev. M., 2007; Volume II. Renaissance. Book 2. Cinquicento / Resp. ed. M.L. Andreev. M., 2010.

Kosikov G.K. Middle Ages and Renaissance. Theoretical problems // Foreign literature of the second millennium. M., 2001.

Meletinsky E.M. medieval romance. M., 1983.

Mikhailov A.D. French novel and issues of genre typology in medieval literature. M., 1976.

Piskunova S.I. "Don Quixote" by Cervantes and genres of Spanish prose of the 16th-17th centuries. M., 1998.

The problem of genre in the literature of the Middle Ages. M., 1994.

Fifteenth century in European literary development. M., 2001.

Silyunas V. Spanish theater of the XVI-XVII centuries. M., 1995.

Huizinga J. Autumn of the Middle Ages. M., 1988.

Chekalov K.A. Mannerism in French and Italian Literature. M., 2000.

Shaitanov I.O. History of Foreign Literature: Renaissance: In 2 vols. M., 2001.

XVII-XVIII centuries.

XVII century in dialogues of epochs and cultures. SPb., 2000.

Renaissance. Baroque. Classicism. M., 1974.

Philosophical aspects of culture and the literary process in the XV II century. SPb., 1999.

Baroque and classicism in the history of world culture. SPb., 2001.

Pinsky L.E. Renaissance. Baroque. Education. M., 2002.

Mikhailov A.V. Poetics of the Baroque: the completion of the rhetorical era // Historical Poetics / Ed. ed. P.A. Grinzer. M., 1994.

Vipper Yu.B. On the Varieties of the Baroque Style in the Western European Literature of the 17th Century // Vipper Yu.B. Creative fates and history. M., 1990.

Pakhsaryan N.T. The 15th century as an “epoch of contradiction”: paradoxes of literary integrity // Foreign Literature of the Second Millennium. 1000–2000. M., 2001.

Zhirmunskaya N.A. From baroque to romanticism. St. Petersburg, 2001.

Oblomievsky D. French classicism. M., 1968.

Silyunas V.Yu. Life style and art styles. SPb., 2000.

Purishev B.I. Essays on German Literature. M., 1996.

Pavlova T. Milton. M., 1997.

Culture of the Age of Enlightenment. M., 1993.

Enlightenment man. M., 1999.

XVIII century: Literature in the system of culture. M., 1999.

XVIII century: The fate of poetry in the era of prose. M., 2002.

Pakhsaryan N.T. Genesis, poetics and genre system of the French novel of the 1690s-1760s. Dnepropetrovsk, 1996.

Pakhsaryan N.T. "Irony of Fate" of the Age of Enlightenment: Renewed Literature or Literature Demonstrating the "Exhaustion of the Old" // Foreign Literature of the Second Millennium. 1000-2000. M., 2001.

Pakhsaryan N.T. History of foreign literature of the 17th-18th centuries: Teaching aid. M., 2003.

Foreign literature of the 17th century. / Ed. N.T. Pakhsaryan. M., 2007.

Kagarlitsky Yu.I. Theater for the ages. Theater of the Age of Enlightenment. M., 1987.

Sokolyansky M.G. Western European novel of the Enlightenment. Kyiv, Odessa, 1983.

Razumovskaya M.V. From "Persian Letters" to "Encyclopedia". Novel and Science in France in the 18th Century. SPb., 1994.

Zababurova N.V. French psychological novel (Enlightenment and Romanticism). Rostov-on-Don, 1992.

Shaitanov I.O. The Thinking Muse: The Discovery of Nature in the Poetry of the 15th-3rd Century. M., 1989.

Solovieva N.A. At the origins of English romanticism. M., 1988.

Zykova E.P. Pastoral in English literature of the 18th century. M., 1999.

Zhirmunsky V.M. Essays on the history of classical German literature. - L., 1972.

Ivanov V.I. Goethe at the turn of two centuries // Ivanov V.I. Native and universal / Comp., before. V.M.Tolmacheva. M., 1994.

Solovieva N.A. Reason and Feeling in the Artistic Consciousness of the 18th Century. M., 2008.

XIX century; turn of XIX -XX centuries.

Aesthetics of the German Romantics / Foreword. A.V.Mikhailova. M., 1982.

Gorbunov A.N. "On Nature, Man and Society" (Wordsworth in his creative heyday, 1797-1807) // Wordsworth W. Prelude and other poetic works. M., 2012.

Karelsky A.V. From hero to man. Two centuries of Western European literature. M., 1990.

Karelsky A.V. Drama of German Romanticism. M., 1992.

Karelsky A.V. Metamorphoses of Orpheus: Conversations on the History of Western Literature: Issues 1-3. M., 1998-2007.

Foreign aesthetics and theory of literature of the XIX-XX centuries. Treatises, articles, essays / Ed., Preface. G.K. Kosikov. M., 1987.

Tolmachev V.M. Where to look for the 19th century? //Foreign literature of the second millennium. 1000–2000 / Ed. L.G. Andreeva. M., 2001.

Ginzburg, Lydia. About psychological prose. L., 1971.

Ginzburg L.Ya. On Romanticism // French romantic story. L., 1982.

Terteryan I.A. Romanticism as an integral phenomenon // Terteryan I.A. A mythical person. M., 1988.

Tolmachev V.M. Romanticism: culture, face, style // "On the borders": foreign literature from the Middle Ages to the present / Ed. L.G. Andreeva. M., 2000.

Zhirmunsky V.M. German romanticism and modern mysticism. SPb., 1996.

Berkovsky N.Ya. Romanticism in Germany. L., 1973.

Berkovsky N.Ya. Articles and lectures on foreign literature. SPb., 2002.

Chavchanidze D.L. The Phenomenon of Art in German Romantic Prose: The Medieval Model and Its Destruction. M., 1997.

Zenkin S.N. Works in French Literature. Yekaterinburg, 1999.

Lukov V.A. French romantic drama. Samara, 2002.

Matsevich A. August Strindberg. Life and work (1849-1912). M., 2003.

Zhirmunsky V.M. Byron and Pushkin. L., 1978.

Dyakonova N.Ya. English romanticism. M., 1978.

Chesterton G.K. Charles Dickens. M., 1982.

Encyclopedia of symbolism. Painting, graphics and sculpture. Literature. Music / Per. from fr. Scientific ed. trans., afterword by V.M. Tolmachev. M., 1999.

Ivanov V.I. Two elements in modern symbolism // Ivanov V.I. Native and universal / Comp., foreword. V.M.Tolmachev. M., 1994.

Oblomievsky D.D. French symbolism. M., 1973.

French symbolism. Dramaturgy and theater / Comp. V. Maksimov. SPb., 2000.

Kosikov G.K. Charles Baudelaire between the "delight of life" and the "horror of life" // Baudelaire C. Flowers of Evil. Poems in prose. Diaries / Ed. G.K. Kosikov. M., 1993.

Kosikov G.K. Two Ways of French Post-Romanticism: Symbolists and Lautreamont // Poetry of French Symbolism. Lautreamont. Songs of Maldoror / Ed. G.K. Kosikov. M., 1993.

Foreign literature of the late XIX - early XX century. Ed. V.M.Tolmacheva / Ed. 4th, add. and reworked. M., 2013.

Shorske K.E. Vienna at the turn of two centuries / Per. with him. SPb., 2001.

20th century

Foreign literature of the twentieth century. Ed. V.M.Tolmacheva / Ed. 2nd, add. and reworked. M., 2014.

English literature from the 19th century to the 20th, from the 20th to the 19th: The problem of the interaction of literary epochs / Ed. ed. A.P. Sarukhanyan, M.I. Sverdlov. M., 2009.

German, Michael. Modernism: The Art of the First Half of the 20th Century. M., 2003.

History of Austrian Literature of the 20th Century: In 2 volumes / Ed. ed. V.D. Sedelnik. M., 2009.

Kruzhkov G. Yeats and Russian poets of the twentieth century // Yeats W.B. Rose and Tower. SPb., 1999.

Cultural studies of the twentieth century. Encyclopedia: In 2 vols. St. Petersburg, 1998.

Self-consciousness of culture and art of the twentieth century / Comp. R.A. Galtseva. M., 2000.

Artistic Landmarks of Foreign Literature of the 20th Century / Ed. A.P. Sarukhanyan. M., 2002.

Call a spade a spade. Program performances of the masters of Western European literature of the twentieth century / Ed. L.G. Andreeva. M., 1986.

Zingerman B.I. Essays on the history of the drama of the twentieth century. M., 1979.

Theater of the twentieth century. Patterns of development. M., 2003.

Chenier-Gandron J. Surrealism / Per. from fr. M., 2002.

Encyclopedia of Expressionism. Sculpture. Architecture. Literature. Dramaturgy. Theatre. Movie. Music / Per. from French; post-last V.M.Tolmacheva. M., 2003.

Zverev A.M. Palace on the Point of a Needle: From the Artistic Experience of the 20th Century. M., 1989.

Surova O.Yu. Man in modernist culture // Foreign literature of the second millennium. 1000-2000. M., 2001.

Velikovsky S.I. Contemplation and Literature. Essays on French culture. M., St. Petersburg, 1999.

Zonina L.A. Paths of time. Notes on the Searches of French Novelists (60-70s). M., 1984.

Andreev L.G. Jean-Paul Sartre. Free consciousness and the twentieth century. M., 1994.

Pavlova N.S. Typology of the German novel. 1900-1945. M., 1982.

Bushmanova N.I. English Modernism: Psychological Prose. Yaroslavl, 1982.

Terteryan I.A. Test of history. Essays on Spanish Literature of the 20th Century. M., 1973.

Silunas V. Federico Garcia Lorca. The poet's drama. M., 1989.

Tolmachev V.M. From Romanticism to Romanticism: The American Novel of the 1920s and the Problem of Romantic Culture. M., 1997.

Kuteishchikova V., Ospovat L. New Latin American novel. M., 1983.

Kofman A.F. Latin American artistic image peace. M., 1997.

Ilyin I.P. Postmodernism. Glossary of terms. M., 2001.

Kosikov G.K. From Structuralism to Poststructuralism (problems of methodology). M., 1998.

Pieguet-Gros, Natalie. Introduction to the theory of intertextuality / Per. from fr. M., 2008.

Tolmachev V.M. E. Hemingway; F.S. Fitzgerald; R. Frost; T.S. Eliot; E. Pound // US Literary History. M., 2014. V.6. Book 1-2.

Tolmachev V.M. T.S. Eliot, poet of The Waste Land // Eliot T.S. Badlands / Ed. prepared by V.M. Tolmachev, A.Yu. Zinoviev. M., 2015.

II. Requirements for the content of the WRC

1. The WRC should be logically built, have continuous page numbering (with the exception of the title page, Table of Contents included in the numbering) and contain:

• title page indicating higher educational institution graduating department, master's program, full name of the defending undergraduate, full name of the supervisor with an indication of the position, scientific title, exact (approved at the meeting of the department) topic of the WRC;
• Table of Contents with links to relevant WRC pages;
• An introduction that justifies the choice of topic, goals and objectives of the study, determines the place of work in the circle of other studies of the same thematic field (main foreign, domestic works), the principle of selecting literary texts for analysis;
• main research part (2-3 chapters, each of which should have a title);
• Conclusion summing up the results of the study;
• scientific bibliography compiled in accordance with the requirements of GOST.

1. It is necessary that the WRC include a detailed analysis of the declared topic, taking into account the latest scientific literature in Russian and foreign languages ​​(quotes from special foreign works are given by the undergraduate in their own Russian translation; all foreign titles of fiction, as well as special texts, are also subject to translation).
2. The work should contain reasonable conclusions that logically follow from the previous presentation and analysis of the material.
3. Scientific bibliography with continuous numbering Arabic numerals, should consist of the following sections:

I. Texts (including all first editions in the original language, other significant editions in the original language; main translations into Russian with an indication of the translator);

II. General works(First, Russian-language studies with the name of the author or the title of the collective monograph follow, then foreign studies);

III. Special works (on a similar principle).

1. The total volume of the master's paper in printed pages (with the general numbering of pages, starting from the title page) is at least 80 pages (including approximately 8-10 pages of the Bibliography). Typeface - TIMES NEW ROMAN, size - 14. Text in footnotes: size - 10.

The procedure for submitting the WRC to the department

The WQR is submitted by the undergraduate to the department no later than 15 days before the official defense deadline, in 2 bound copies, as well as on electronic media - disks, flash drives (with the appropriate full name, topic). Each printed copy must contain title page Supervisor visa: "Admitted to defense" (exact number, full name, signature). One of the copies must contain a signed review of the supervisor with a conclusion on admission / non-admission to protection.

One of the copies of the WRC is handed over by the SEC secretary to the reviewer, the other is checked by the SEC within 5 calendar days for illegal borrowing.

A master student who has not submitted a WRC to the department 15 days before the official deadline for the defense, and who does not have the opinion of the supervisor on admission to the defense, is not allowed to defend.

It is also not issued for the defense of the WRC with a serious amount of incorrect borrowings officially established by the SEC.

5 days before the official deadline for the defense of the WRC, the master has the right to receive a written review from the scientific reviewer to prepare for the defense.

WRC protection procedure

The sequence of WRC defenses on the officially established date is determined by the SEC and its chairman.

Within 10-12 minutes, the person defending must report to the SEC on the content of the WRC and the conclusions received.

Then the SEC members have the right to ask the defending undergraduate questions about the content of his scientific presentation, as well as about the design of the WRC.

After that, the floor is given to the scientific reviewer.

The undergraduate responds to the opinion of the scientific reviewer, especially dwelling on its critical part.

Then comes the time for a scientific discussion with the participation of the master, members of the SEC, and a scientific reviewer.

In conclusion, the floor is again given to the master.

After all the defenses are completed, the SEC collectively makes a decision on the results of the defense of the WRC by each of the defenders, and also officially announces the results of the defense to undergraduates.

In case of disagreement with the results of the defense, the undergraduate has the right to appeal.

WRC protection evaluation criteria

Grade "unsatisfactory"

1. The reviewer and members of the SEC found serious errors. In WRC, an independent research part is weakly expressed.
2. The Bibliography lacks the most important domestic and foreign scientific work on the topic of this WRC.
3. The graduate cannot state the content of the work, formulate and argue the conclusions.
4. The work is carelessly framed, it contains spelling errors, grammatical norm; The bibliography is not compiled according to the rules.
5. The questions of the members of the SEC are given incorrect answers, or no answers are given at all.

Grade "satisfactory"

1. The declared topic is poorly disclosed, the tasks of the work are solved to a small extent.
2. The independent research part of the work is small or performed at a low scientific level. The reviewer and members of the SEC found errors.
3. The list of scientific literature is not complete.
4. Oral communication about the work does not adequately reflect its content.
5. The graduate does not answer all the questions of the SEC members or answers uncertainly and superficially.

Rated "good"

1. The stated topic is disclosed, but certain aspects of the work should be developed or supplemented.
2. There are some shortcomings in the independent research part of the work.
3. There are some notes to the Bibliography.
4. The graduate answers some questions of the SEC members with insufficient reasoning.

Rating "excellent"

1. The declared topic is fully disclosed, all the scientific problems formulated in the Introduction are solved in an original way.
2. The independent research part of the work is significant in terms of results, does not contain significant shortcomings.
3. The work reflects a deep knowledge of the scientific literature on the topic.
4. In the oral report on the work, its content and the results of the study are presented fully and reasonably.
5. The undergraduate gives exhaustive answers to the questions of the SEC members.

The compiler of the document
Head of the master's program,
head of department
history of foreign literature
Professor V.M.Tolmachev

The document also provides:

• a ban on students and persons involved in the GIA, during its conduct, to carry and use means of communication;
• a ban on charging students for passing the GIA;
• features of conducting state attestation tests using e-learning, distance learning technologies;
• the formation of not only state examination commissions for conducting the GIA, but also appeal commissions for conducting appeals based on the results of the GIA;
• features of the GIA for the disabled;
• the possibility of re-passing the GIA not earlier than one year and not later than five years after the deadline for the GIA, which was not passed by the student;
• the right of the student to appeal based on the results of state certification tests, etc.

There are no plans to change the forms of the GIA (state exam, defense of the final qualification work). The procedure for the implementation of these forms of conducting the GIA is specified. In particular, the state examination may be conducted orally or in writing in one or more disciplines or modules of the educational program.

It was clarified that the GIA is carried out within the time limits determined by the organization, but no later than June 30. At the same time, the schedule of state attestation tests must be approved no later than 30 calendar days before the day of the first test. The schedule must indicate the dates, time and place of the state certification tests and pre-examination consultations. The break between state attestation tests must be at least seven calendar days.

In turn, the list of topics for final qualifying works offered to students must be brought to the attention of students no later than six months before the start date of the SFA. Reviewing is still provided for final qualifying works on master's and specialist's programs.

In addition, persons who are mastering an educational program in the form of self-education or studying in an educational program of higher education that does not have state accreditation will be able to take an external course of the State Academic Examination in an organization with state accreditation of an educational program.

The results of the state attestation test, conducted orally, will be announced on the day of its conduct, and the results of the test, conducted in writing, on the next working day after the day of its conduct.

The order also specifies the procedure for the formation and activities of the state examination commission, its composition (it must include at least four people, two of which are leading specialists - representatives of employers or their associations in the relevant field of professional activity, the rest - teachers or researchers of the university or other organizations with an academic title or degree).

The order will come into force on January 1, 2016. From the same date, the current order of the Ministry of Education and Science of Russia dated March 25, 2003 No. 1155 "" will become invalid.