Anniversary, seventieth. What is the UN General Assembly and why is it needed? Development Summit and General Debate

(the organization is banned in Russia), the problems of refugees in Europe and the situation in Ukraine. During the General Assembly, speeches will be made by the leaders of the founding countries of the UN, including Vladimir.

The Russian president, as the head of the Russian Foreign Ministry noted earlier, will talk about Syria and Ukraine. Putin had already delivered a speech at the anniversary UN General Assembly in 2005, but then his speech was quite routine: he raised the topic of adapting the UN to new historical realities and shared plans for Russia's upcoming G8 presidency.

Political blockbuster instead of "Munich speech"

Today, when Russia found itself in international isolation due to the events in Crimea, the Russian leader uses such a platform as the UN for a more intense speech: “Putin has not spoken at sessions for a long time, and this one is also the most difficult for Russia. Therefore, it cannot be ruled out that his speech will be meaningful and rich, and it will contain "new peace initiatives," says the Americanist professor.

At the same time, those who expect Putin to repeat the "Munich speech" will be disappointed. “This is not the best place for that, so everything will be peaceful here,” said Zevelev, who expects to hear “something new about Syria.”

In turn, the expert of the EurAsEC Institute, Nadana Friedrichson, characterizes the General Assembly itself as a "political blockbuster", where Russia and the United States will confront each other for influence on European countries in the Syrian crisis. “The United States and Russia will fight to pull as much as possible more European partners to their position on resolving the Syrian crisis,” says Friedrichson.

The General Assembly will not resolve the Syrian crisis - only the Security Council has the authority to take decisive action, but the speeches will make it possible to hear the different positions of the parties on the crisis in Syria and its consequences in the form of an influx of refugees to Europe. “These two themes have something in common: they both pose a threat to nation-states. Here the task is to identify pain points, and not to develop specific signals, ”says Zevelev.

Working with refugees in various countries of the world is a favorite hobby of various UN organizations and the main one is the Office of the High Commissioner for Refugees. True, UN officials admit that the organization does not have money to solve the problems of Syrian refugees. “At the beginning of the year, we asked for help in raising $4.5 billion to help 4 million refugees in neighboring countries. Today is already September, and we have collected no more than 40% of the funds, ”said official representative in a recent interview with American NPR radio. Donations from national governments and private foundations are the only way to receive funds. In this regard, it is expected that UN officials, both from high rostrums and on the sidelines of the summit, will ask the leaders of states to fork out.

What will Obama say?

The American president will talk about the US efforts to combat the terrorist group ISIS - the US leads a coalition to fight the Islamists. Last year, Obama used the UN platform to talk about the same threat. He personally held a meeting on this issue, which is rare for an American president. True, in that speech he mentioned ISIS only a couple of times, stating that the ideology of this terrorist group “will perish, one has only to bring it to clean water and meet her face to face in the light of day."

Unlike high-flown words about ISIS, the role of Russia in Ukraine was spoken about more specifically. “Russian aggression in Europe is reminiscent of the days when big nations triumphed over small nations driven by territorial ambitions,” Obama said.

It is not yet clear whether the new speech will be so tough on Russia or whether Syria and ISIS will take the main place in it, and Russia will be mentioned only in passing. If this happens, it will mean that the crisis in Ukraine will fade into the background for the United States.

It should be noted that for Obama this last chance to speak at such a representative session of the General Assembly. He resigns from his post the following year. "It's important if Obama can speak as a world leader and not just as president of the United States," says Nicolai, president of the Center for Global Interest in Washington.

According to Zlobin, this General Assembly will show whether it will be possible "to find common ground for the diplomacy of the West, Russia, the United States and China, or it will emphasize and intensify the split of the world and the isolation of Russia."

The meeting between Putin and Obama on the sidelines of the UN General Assembly may or may not take place. Neither side confirmed that such a meeting had been requested. If it does take place, no breakthroughs should be expected, but even a short handshake or exchange of views is very important, given the depth of the crisis in relations. It is not yet clear whether Putin will meet with the President of Ukraine. So far, there is no exact information about this, and the Ukrainian side notes that "there are agreements between the capitals."

The Security Council is turning, the Security Council is turning...

During the General Assembly, there will be a lot of talk about the reform of the UN itself. Politicians on both the right and the left have been saying for many years that UN reform is overdue and that one of the main goals is to change the Security Council. Countries such as Germany, Japan, India and Brazil have long been among the contenders for permanent membership in the Security Council. As Sergei Lavrov, the head of the organization, noted in an interview, today there are "two irreconcilable positions" on this issue. “One group of countries absolutely insists on the creation of new permanent seats, and the second believes that it is categorically impossible to allow the creation of new permanent seats and that solutions should be sought through expanding the number of non-permanent members,” the head of Russian diplomacy noted. “At the same time, both groups are in favor of expanding the UN Security Council,” Lavrov said.

In turn, Zlobin from the Center for Global Interests expects that one of the main intrigues of the General Assembly will be precisely the statement of fact: the UN, and even more so the Security Council, are politically dead. “It is unlikely that everyone will celebrate the anniversary and not think about how to create international organization capable of being an adequate management tool in the current conditions international system. The UN has long turned into a humanitarian organization that is unable to properly resolve any political conflict,” he said.

United Nations, 15 September. The 70th session of the General Assembly (GA) began its work at the UN Headquarters world organization.

Its first meeting was opened by the chairman - former head Danish Foreign Ministry Mogens Likketoft.

"I declare the 70th session of the General Assembly open," he said, striking with his gavel.

After that, the Chairman of the General Assembly invited the delegates of 193 member countries of the General Assembly to hold a minute of "silence, prayer and reflection."

During the first plenary session, which lasted less than an hour, a number of procedural decisions were made, including those concerning the composition and organization of work of the GA committees. In addition, a warning was issued to member countries in arrears in contributions to the UN budget - serious delays in payment could lead to a temporary loss of voting rights.

Historic session of the General Assembly

In his opening speech, Mogens Lukketoft expressed his hope that the anniversary session of the General Assembly "will be truly historic." He recalled that in less than 10 days, a summit will be held at the UN headquarters, during which the 2030 global development agenda, which is aimed at eradicating poverty and hunger, will be approved.

In addition, the Chairman of the GA announced plans to put to the vote a draft resolution concerning peacekeeping the United Nations, as well as holding a meeting in December high level in preparation for the World Summit on information society. In the spring of 2016, the General Assembly will hold meetings on the fight against drugs and combating HIV / AIDS, Lukketoft said.

According to him, when organizing the work of the GA, he will take into account the interest of countries in the reform of the UN Security Council, as well as calls to give "greater transparency and openness" to the selection process Secretary General.

The UN has stood the test of time

UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon spoke highly of the work plan outlined by the Chairman of the General Assembly, and also announced his readiness to "give him full support."

"This session marks the 70th anniversary of the founding of the United Nations. The principles laid down in the UN Charter have stood the test of time," said Ban Ki-moon. At the same time, he drew attention to the "scale of suffering that continues in the world." "Today, I especially remember the people of Syria - those who are facing horrendous violence inside the country and those who have fled and are desperately seeking asylum and are trying to start new life", he noted.

As the UN Secretary General stated, the 70th session of the General Assembly should focus on "compassion, prevention and, above all, real action."

Development Summit and General Debate

The first major event within the framework of the GA will be the Global Development Summit, which will be held on September 25-27. Particular attention to the summit will be riveted not only because dozens of heads of state and government will take part in it. On the opening day - September 25 - Pope Francis will visit the UN Headquarters for the first time in 20 years.

The day after the end of the development summit at headquarters, a general political discussion will start, in which over 150 heads of state and government, as well as dozens of foreign ministers of UN member states, are expected to participate this year. Statements by country delegations will last until 3 October.

Participants in the general debate are expected to touch upon the most pressing global issues, including the conflicts in Ukraine, Syria and Yemen, as well as the fight against terrorism, the situation with migrants and global change climate. The busiest day promises to be the first day of the debate, on which the presidents of Russia, Brazil, Iran, Kazakhstan, Poland, the United States and France will speak from the rostrum of the General Assembly.

Debates in the UN Security Council and the Quartet meeting

Sessions in the general debate of the General Assembly, which will last from morning until late in the evening, will be accompanied by many meetings in the margins.

Summits are planned on UN peacekeeping, on issues of combating terrorism, and on September 30, ministerial debates on the topic "Maintaining international peace and security: conflict resolution in the Middle East and North Africa and combating the terrorist threat in the region."

On the same day, a high-level meeting on problems related to illegal migration and a ministerial meeting of the "quartet" of mediators on the Middle East settlement (Russia, the US, the EU and the UN) will be held.

About the UN General Assembly

The General Assembly is the main deliberative body of the UN. In 1946, a year after the formation of the United Nations, there were 51 states in its composition, now there are 193. The last country to join the UN was in 2011 South Sudan.

With the expansion of the organization, the agenda of the Assembly also underwent significant changes: in the late 1940s, it was devoted mainly to the problems of decolonization. Now the range of issues discussed in the UN General Assembly includes the problems of social and economic development, conflict prevention, post-war reconstruction, combating terrorism, corruption, drug trafficking and HIV/AIDS, protecting women and children, promoting human rights and the basic principles of democracy. In addition, discussions on the reform of the UN Security Council are being held in the format of the General Assembly.

The 70th anniversary session of the UN General Assembly (GA) will begin its work at the headquarters of the world organization in New York. The yearly cycle, which promises to be one of the most eventful in the history of the United Nations, will be kick-started by Secretary General Ban Ki-moon and Austrian diplomat Mogens Likketoft, elected in June as chairman of the 70th session.

According to TASS, the official opening ceremony will take place at 15:00 local time (21:00 Kyiv time). The last meeting of the current 69th session was held at the UN Headquarters the day before. Over the past 12 months, 193 member states of the General Assembly have discussed many issues, and adopted about 300 resolutions and decisions by vote or by consensus.

The agenda of the 70th session of the General Assembly includes 170 topics, including issues of maintaining peace and security, preventing armed conflicts, countering terrorism, racial discrimination and xenophobia, protecting environment, promoting the sustainable development of countries, observing the nuclear non-proliferation regime, protecting human rights and ensuring the rule of law.

Consideration of issues related to the reform of the Security Council will also continue. On the last day of work, the 69th session of the General Assembly adopted a resolution that “decides to convene working group open-ended on the question of equitable representation on and expansion of the Security Council”.

In addition, during the year, the campaign to elect the UN Secretary General officially starts. The powers of Ban Ki-moon, who has been in office since January 1, 2007, expire on December 31, 2016, and he is not eligible to run for a third five-year term. On September 11, the General Assembly adopted a resolution calling for greater transparency in the process of electing the Secretary General.

Currently, the list of possible contenders includes UNESCO Executive Director Irina Bokova, current UNDP Administrator Helen Clark, Chilean and Lithuanian Presidents Michelle Bachelet and Dalia Grybauskaite, and former Danish Prime Minister Helle Thorning-Schmidt.

Traditionally, a week after the opening of the session, a general political discussion is held within the framework of the General Assembly - debates, during which the delegates of the UN member countries can speak on any issue.

However, this year the general debate has been postponed and the first really big event of the GA will be the development summit on 25-27 September. During it, the agenda of global socio-economic development for 2015-2030 will be approved, the draft of which was approved by the UN member countries a few weeks ago.

Particular attention to the summit will be riveted not only because dozens of heads of states and governments will take part in it. On the opening day, September 25, Pope Francis will visit the UN Headquarters for the first time in 20 years.

The day after the end of the development summit at headquarters, a general political discussion will start, in which over 150 heads of state and government, as well as dozens of foreign ministers of UN member states, are expected to participate this year. Statements by country delegations will last until 3 October.

Participants in the general debate are expected to touch upon the world's most pressing issues, including the conflicts in Ukraine, Syria and Yemen, as well as the fight against terrorism, the situation with migrants and global climate change. The busiest day promises to be the first day of the debate, on which the presidents of Russia, Brazil, Iran, Kazakhstan, Poland, the United States and France will speak from the rostrum of the General Assembly.

Over the 70 years of its existence, the UN has made a great contribution to the fight against hunger and poverty, epidemics and the consequences of disasters. However, its efforts to prevent regional armed conflicts and peacekeeping were not as successful.

The 70th Anniversary Session of the UN General Assembly was the most representative and important international event of 2015. More than 140 heads of states and governments took part in the general political discussion held at the session. Were the results predictable? What will be on the agenda of the international community in the future?

The panellists discussed a range of issues, from security issues to humanitarian cooperation. Many speakers expressed concern about the growing number of global challenges caused by human activities. Uruguayan President Tabare Vazquez has gone so far as to compare the developments in the world today to a lunatic asylum taken over by patients. Much attention was paid to the 2030 sustainable development agenda, adopted shortly before the General Assembly session to promote the transition to sustainable production and consumption patterns.

However, most attention was paid to the problem of coordinating international efforts to combat ISIS, which forced the once main threats - the spread of the deadly Ebola fever and the conflict in Ukraine, which became the subject of discussion at the last session, to fade into the background. A task of truly paramount importance in the present international situation is the fight against international terrorism. Spain and Romania even took the initiative to establish a special international tribunal for members terrorist organizations. But while world leaders agreed that Syria and Iraq needed to be cleared of terrorist groups they never managed to reach an understanding on how to achieve this goal. In fact, two anti-terrorist groups have begun to take shape, one of which includes the United States, France, Turkey and Qatar, and the other includes Russia and Iran.

It turns out that the disagreements between states are rooted in the inability to determine the source of the terrorist threat, as well as ways to eliminate it and restore statehood. For example, the emir of Qatar said that the spread of terrorism in Syria is a response to the brutal suppression of popular discontent. Thus, he seemed to hint that Bashar al-Assad is responsible for the current difficult situation in the country, who, therefore, should no longer remain in power. A similar position was taken by French President Francois Hollande, who accused Assad of using barrel bombs against the civilian population of Syria and questioned the position of the current Syrian president on a post-war settlement. US President Barack Obama and Turkish Prime Minister Ahmet Davutoglu also supported the idea that a return to the pre-war status quo between the Syrian government and the opposition is no longer possible. The leaders of Russia and Iran issued opposite statements, emphasizing the need to provide assistance to the current Syrian authorities. In their opinion, rampant terrorism is the result of external armed interference in the internal affairs of a sovereign country, as was the case with the American invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan. While such temporary alliances have great potential, without joining forces, it will be extremely difficult for them to defeat ISIS and establish lasting peace in Syria and Iraq.

Another topic that sparked heated debate at the session of the General Assembly was the compromise on the Iranian nuclear program. The deal was approved and supported by the overwhelming majority of countries, whose representatives called the conclusion of the relevant agreement proof of the effectiveness of diplomacy. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's eloquent and impassioned speech, which characterized the deal with Iran as a mistake that was destined to have the most dire consequences, sounded dissonant. The Israeli leader urged the international community not to work towards a gradual easing of economic and trade sanctions against Tehran, but, on the contrary, to continue to put pressure on Iran until it fully fulfills its obligations to the IAEA and start lifting sanctions no sooner than this happens. It is expected, however, that the parties will continue to implement the Iran-5+1 nuclear agreement, despite its condemnation by Israel, which in this case will act as a partisan observer.

The issue of economic sanctions has often been raised by world leaders whose countries have had or still have to be subjected to restrictive measures. For example, GA participants welcomed the US decision to ease trade and economic restrictions against Cuba and restore diplomatic relations with it. However, both Washington and Havana interpreted the first step to lift the sanctions and the compromises they reached in their favor. Since the end of World War II, sanctions have become an increasingly common means of enforcing foreign policy representing an alternative to military conflicts and hybrid wars. Today, various kinds of economic restrictions operate against countries such as Iran, North Korea, Zimbabwe, Cuba, Sudan, Russia and Belarus. Speaking at the General Assembly, representatives of these countries called them illegal and unfounded. Presidents Putin and Lukashenko tried to oppose the concept of sanctions with the idea of ​​"integration of integrations", which consists in the harmonization of regional economic projects. However, this idea failed to gain support in the General Assembly.

What do countries like Switzerland, Norway, India, Pakistan and Sierra Leone have in common? At the General Assembly, their representatives, as well as representatives of several other countries, called for a profound reform of the UN Security Council. In essence, the main topics of this session were the future of the UN and its ability to respond to the challenges of our time. There is no doubt that over the 70 years of its existence, the UN has made a great contribution to the fight against hunger and poverty, epidemics and the consequences of disasters. However, her efforts to prevent regional armed conflicts and maintain peace were not as successful. Whenever one of the permanent members of the UN Security Council was involved in a conflict in one way or another, the activity of this body was paralyzed. The Assembly was very pleased with France's proposal to limit the right of veto in the Security Council when issues such as a threat to the peace or the fact of crimes are brought up for discussion. In addition, the representative of France called for an increase in the number of permanent members. Such a reform of the UN would make its decision-making mechanism more flexible. It would also mean her complete departure from the Yalta-Potsdam system international relations, the last pillars of which are precisely the right of veto and the invariance of the composition of the UN Security Council. The reform of the Security Council has already begun, and there is no doubt that by the next anniversary, the UN Security Council will look completely different.

After the creation of the Federal Reserve System in 1913, the establishment of the UN was the next step by which the triumvirate "RRR" - the Rothschilds, the Rockefellers, the Romanovs - formed and are forming the world government. Today we are watching the final stage of this operation.

So the 70th anniversary UN General Assembly has come to an end. The world watched this action. And very carefully. But just one day passed, and everyone suddenly realized that no one understood anything. What happened there in the end? Let's figure it out together.

UN

First, what is the UN? The question is by no means as transparent as it might seem at first glance. No matter how you feel about the so-called conspiracy theory, but in the case of the UN, this is precisely the conspiracy. No theory. Just hard practice.

It is known that the UN Charter was approved during the Second World War - at a conference held from April to June 1945 in San Francisco. And it was signed on June 26, 1945 by representatives of 50 states. That is, the work on the creation of the UN was carried out even before the victory Soviet people in the Great Patriotic War.

It is especially necessary to realize that the foundations of the UN activities and its structure were developed back in the years of the Second World War. This work was carried out by "leading members of the anti-Hitler coalition", which at that time did not yet exist. The name "United Nations" was first used in the Declaration of the United Nations, signed on January 1, 1942, that is, only six months after Hitler's attack on the USSR.

World War II was initiated just to create the UN. After the creation of the Federal Reserve System in 1913, the establishment of the UN was the next step by which the triumvirate "RRR" - the Rothschilds, the Rockefellers, the Romanovs - formed and are forming the world government. Today we are watching the final stage of this operation.

The meaning of introducing the UN into international political circulation is to give visible legitimacy to any military aggression. The UN is Shvonder from the work of Mikhail Bulgakov " dog's heart". This rootless bastard drinks blood from quite wealthy citizens - that is, the absolutely rootless UN drinks blood independent states.

70

Secondly, the number "70" is a sacred number in the Semitic religion. Remember 70 interpreters, 70 books of the Bible, 70 Alexandrias built by "Alexander" "Macedonian", etc. In my novel “Battle for the World Throne” (read) I showed that the number “70” is a religious tracing paper of calendar reckoning: exactly in 70 years the solstices and equinoxes are shifted forward by one day. That is, the sky rotates by one degree. it a natural phenomenon is called the prelude to the equinoxes.

The sky rotates 30 degrees in 2100 years. This is an astronomical ERA. Each such era opens a new MESSIAH. Among the Semites, the era of Aries was opened by Moses, the era of Pisces was opened by Christ. And today's era of Aquarius, which came in 2000, was opened by ... Vladimir Putin. By his surprising appointment to the post of President of Russia.

And here is the most a prime example attachment of representatives of the world government to the biblical symbolism of the number "70". The Zionist revolution in Russia was committed by Jews in 1917, and exactly 70 years later, in 1987, these same criminals began to commit another crime - the destruction of the USSR.

It was in 1987 that the active phase of Gorbachev's reforms began in the USSR. In this year, relations between the USSR and the USA “accidentally” improved markedly. Already on January 13, in the "old New Year”, Decree of the Council of Ministers of the USSR “On the procedure for the creation on the territory of the USSR and the activities of joint ventures with the participation of Soviet organizations and firms of capitalist and developing countries» gave rise to education private enterprises , that is, the leadership of the Soviet state made a constitutional coup and destroyed the Soviet system.

And then the marauders followed. Already on January 15, Soviet-American arms control negotiations resumed in Geneva, as a result of which Russia subsequently found itself almost unarmed. On February 10, 1987, as part of the “perestroika”, it was the Soviet Government that began to form fifth column : 140 "dissidents" released from prisons and camps. In Washington (USA), Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev and US President Ronald Reagan signed the Treaty on the Elimination of Intermediate-Range and Short-Range Missiles.

1945

Do you have any idea what today's date is? In 2015, exactly 70 years have passed since the day when "the whole civilized world" defeated the "global evil" - Sephardic Hitler. Remember, we recently celebrated the 70th anniversary of the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki? This is the official date for the end of the war.

The fact that this victory was paid for by 27 million lives of the predominantly Russian people is of little interest to anyone today. The “progressive majority” remembers only the “Holocaust”, which the Jewish media wept over in 1919-1923, and dragged them to the period of the Second World War by the usual distortion of political and historical “maps”.

Everyone knows that criminals and, especially, maniacs fall asleep on trifles. So you, dear reader, can you believe that the World War begins and ends strictly on schedule? You can not? But in vain!

World War II officially began on September 1, 1939 and ended on September 2, 1945. Yes. Like this. Day to day. Strictly on schedule.

It is very interesting to look at the symbolic representation of the warring parties - the losers and the winners. Started the war Romanov clan they were expelled from Russian Empire Rothschilds ("red").

The Romanovs are the kings of the Roman Empire (German), therefore, the countries of both Roman empires - Germany, Slovakia, Italy, Albania, Hungary, Romania, Croatia, Finland and Bulgaria - entered the "Axis of Evil". And also this "Axis" included the countries of Southeast Asia, where the "Russian" tsars of the Romanovs took Russian gold before the First World War - this is, first of all, the Philippines, but also their neighbors: Thailand, China, Burma, Iraq, Japan, Manchukuo.

The Romanovs are. They printed from 1913 until 2014 and sold these notes as money to all other states. Today in Russia there are, and others left from the Romanov clan.

It is believed that the Romanovs lost in World War II, and the Rothschilds (USSR) and Rockefellers (USA) won it. At least that's what historians say. But in reality this is not the case. In the form of World War II in front of the population globe a grandiose in scale and equally immoral scam was played out.

What do historians say? They write: they say that 62 states out of 73 that existed at that time participated in the Second World War, which accounted for 80 percent of the world's population [TSB: World War II 1939-1945]. These figures tell the reader the geographic scope - they say, look, the whole world was at war. Wow, what a war it was!

But 93 percent of the losses in the entire Second World War were German armed forces suffered only on the Soviet front [according to Falin: K. Rozhnov. West and the USSR: contribution to victory]. That is, as if all countries were at war, and the war touched only the USSR. It's like adding all the fans of the stadium to the number of players participating in the match - everyone, they say, was chasing the ball on the field!

The same applies to human losses in this war. It is officially stated that the Second World War had, they say, a huge impact on the fate of all mankind. Again, propagandists are juggling numbers: they say that 72 states participated in it, that is, 80 percent of the world's population, hostilities were conducted on the territory of 40 states, as many as 110 million people were mobilized into the armed forces, and the total loss of life reached 60-65 million people, Of these, 27 million people were killed on the fronts.

Those are terrible numbers.

And there is no lie behind the manipulation of these figures. And she is. First, if 93 percent of the Nazis' losses occurred on the Soviet front, then what were all the other countries doing? Pushed sideways? It turns out that they killed someone there, but somehow did not contribute to the overall victory.

Many countries lie and exaggerate their participation in World War II. For example, Sweden and Switzerland lost 50 people each in the war. Iran - 200, Ireland - 200, Mexico - 100, Cuba - 100 ... All these countries then got into the final statistical report on the war, which formed the basis for the creation of the UN.

The meaning of these statistics is not to pay tribute to the memory of the winners, but to collect statistics for the world government - they say, we are acting on behalf of the entire planet.

$610 billion

But even the figures of financial losses show that we are being presented with a lie. The USSR lost $610 billion in the war; USA - 137; Great Britain - 150; Germany - 300; Italy - 50; Japan - 100; some "other countries" - 350, and in total - $ 2,600 billion. Huge money in the prices of those years!

But remember, everyone is lost. Who then found it? Money doesn't evaporate. If the tank is hit, then the money paid for it cannot be pulled out of the manufacturer's pocket. If the train derailed, then the payment for this train has already taken place. If planes are shot down, then money is received for them.

Who collected all this money? Were they not those who gave money for the creation and functioning of the UN? Or will we again be told about some mythical bankers? ..

The material "" describes the procedure for creating not only the FRS, but also the UN. And it is the "Russian" Tsar Nicholas II who is the founder of the UN. In 1904, a group of representatives of 48 states (the UN registered 50 states) at a secret meeting in Paris approved the procedure for creating the International Financial System (IFS) and the World Source of Money Supply. But most importantly, at the suggestion of Nicholas II, it was decided to create the League of Nations (now it is called the UN). To ensure trade relations between countries, it was decided to create a single World Financial Center with its own currency on the basis of the League of Nations.

In this same League of Nations (proto-UN), Russia, through the banker Rothschild, contributed 48.6 tons of gold, exported in advance by the tsar from Russia to the country of the Jews - Iveria (today - Spain). Later, the Rothschilds transported this gold to the United States and, on behalf of Russia, established the Federal Reserve System (FRS) there. Russia owns 88.8 percent of the Fed. The remaining 11.2 percent belongs to China. Therefore, the recent series of fires occurred in China (see "").

Syria

Both World War I and World War II world war were organized by three clans "RRR" - the Rothschilds, the Rockefellers, the Romanovs. These wars were used as a tool for pumping money out of independent states and pumping the world government represented by the UN with stolen capital.

Today, the UN is precisely the world government that kills any manifestation of independence of any of the countries. The UN redistributes living quotas between countries. The UN administers the right to wage war.

That's why Russian President Vladimir Putin, sounded from the UN rostrum, was directed not to abstract horizons, but to a very clear goal - it is he, Putin, who should become the head of the world government. And with his speech, he showed that he takes such a right.

In the past 2014, the Romanov FRS ceased its legitimate existence (see ""). Because of this, there was a massive outflow of money from all sectors of the economy. This was the "crisis".

From the end of 2014 to the autumn of 2015, there was a battle for the chair of the emperor of the world. I described this struggle in detail in my novel The Battle for the World Throne (read). And while world events are developing exactly according to the book. And all the more interesting is the ending of my novel.

Today's bombing of Syria is from there. This country is a sacred place of slaughter. And in this war are not important real reasons. Both enemies - Assad and ISIS - were created by the RRR triumvirate represented by the UN. This is another war with which UN-PPP will collect blood money from all over the world. Once again, the economies of the countries will be empty, and the UN-PPP world government will get rich accordingly.

Why was Syria chosen as the site of such a public and showy battle? Because this place is defined in the bible, and the RRR-UN triumvirate is simply frankly turned in this collection of fairy tales from the peoples of the world. Both the Romanovs, and the Rothschilds, and the Rockefellers seriously believe that Syria is the site of a biblical apocalyptic battle.

Actually it is not. And the kings, and bankers, and oilmen had to go to school. Syria is not the center of the world, and the bible lies here. The main center is the Donbass, which is why the Zionists are carrying out an outright genocide of the Russian population there (see ""). And since this genocide is going on under the guise of the Rothschilds-Rockefellers-Romanovs and the UN, then none of the "progressive humanity" and "" sees these atrocities.

More than a million refugees from the Donbass remained unnoticed, not a single European country gave a single piece of bread to the people dying in the Donbass. But when several thousand Semites fled, Europe burst into tears of golden tears, covered them with gold (earned by whites) and fed them with halva (produced by whites).

The notorious world government that everyone is looking for so diligently and can't seem to find is the UN. This organization did not hide anywhere - it remained in sight and spread rot on the peoples with the insipid mine of a maniac.

third force

The initiative to create a world government by the RRR triumvirate is understandable - the golden billion Zionists control the rest of the world - the world of slaves. All nations, according to the plan of the RRR, should work hard for their masters, and these gentlemen will deign to attend synagogues, kill at their own discretion, study the Bible, suffer from Judaism - in general, “do” everything that the master should do. After all, remember, the Bible promises "to give the Jews all nations to be devoured."

It is this third force that has the ability to wipe the RRR triumvirate from the face of the Earth. And this is known (see, for example, ""). Before the last UN General Assembly, the showdown with the world government moved into a decisive phase. Knowing about such danger, .

The third force delivered an ultimatum and waited to see if the right person would become emperor. And this choice was more important than ever. And in the meantime modern world turned upside down. People began to seriously wait for the end of the world.

Speaking about the religious basis of world wars, one has to note: for some reason, religious games in confessions and sects seem to these same people less hazards than seasonal temperature fluctuations on the planet. For some reason, every emperor strives, like a flea, to jump to the beard of God and there to gain a foothold in her hair. For some reason, rebellious gods and problematic messiahs sometimes forget that there is always a force on them that will chain this rebellion to a mountain or nail it to a cross. For some reason, armies of believers, like sheep, follow their rebellious shepherds straight to the same slaughterhouse.

Not one of the rebels has yet proved to God that he is right. And there will never be such a proof, for God is one year, and there is no equal to him, so that it would even be worth listening to such a one for a while. And for every squeak of a mosquito there is always a piece of elastic rubber.

The convolutions in the brain of a living creature were not made crooked by God so that this creature would spend its entire worthless life on straightening them. Other emperors, having fallen under the power of a rogue with the face of a Sufi, fall not only into nirvana, but also into elementary heresy. The contagious gene has been circulating around the world since the time when the most disgusting side of human activity, religion, was degenerated by the half-breed brain.

Having slipped on this liquid shit of the next messiah, another emperor lost his mind and became his harbinger. If such a disease concerned only one emperor, then one could create successful circuses from the leaders of the messiahs. But the trouble is that such emperors, not realizing their intellectual weakness, put their people - which they must protect - in the fire of religious crimes. Religion always turns a creature inside out, and even the most tasty food under religious sauce turns out to be disgusting green vomit.

If madmen like Nikon arrange reforms of the calendar, in which millions of innocent citizens are put to death, then there are also tsars who are healthy in mind, such as, for example, Tsarina Catherine II, who assessed the Nikonians in this way: “ Nikon is a person who arouses disgust in me. I would have been happier if I had not heard of his name. Nikon also tried to subjugate the sovereign: he wanted to become a pope. Nikon brought turmoil and division into the domestic, peaceful before him and holistically united church. The tripartiteness was imposed on us by the Greeks with the help of curses, tortures and death penalty. Nikon made a tyrant and torturer of his people from Alexei the tsar-father».

Whether the new emperor will be a torturer of the people, or whether he will become a wise ruler, is already known. Few. For the rest, time will tell. Remember what British Foreign Secretary Lord Halifax said? In his radio address to the people, he stated: We won't stop fighting until peace is established »…

Andrey Tyunyaev, Chief Editor newspaper "President"